Premier League · resolved market
Ipswich Town FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 9.5 Total Corners
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xd5ae7447c258140ff24939f5f94df2bc9aebf5f2677f712d77afa71af8a9273e
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Underof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Premier Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $7,969
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $7,969
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $7,969 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 16 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Premier League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Premier League | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x4b40…2f6abacked Under | 52c | 5,000$2,600 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$2,399.99 | 8 | 75%6 W · 2 L | +1.6wins | +0.20per pick | 55cpaid | +32.5%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xbc5b…3f6abacked Under | 51c | 2,917$1,502 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$1,415.84 | 3 | 66.7%2 W · 1 L | +0.6wins | +0.19per pick | 48cpaid | +31.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x6d3c…d294backed Over | 48c | 2,500$1,200 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$1,200 | 1,179 | 50%590 W · 589 L | +7.4wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | +2.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xb2e2…4e99backed Over | 48c | 1,329$638 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$637.84 | 92 | 50%46 W · 46 L | +4.9wins | +0.05per pick | 45cpaid | +9.8%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xc249…8a61backed Over | 48c | 600$288 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$288 | 38 | 42.1%16 W · 22 L | -5.4wins | -0.14per pick | 56cpaid | -23.9%equal weight | 40-0.09 edge/pick |
| 0x2a69…d2f7backed Over | 48c | 544.25$261 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$261.24 | 953 | 32.5%310 W · 643 L | -8.3wins | -0.01per pick | 33cpaid | -11.7%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xd01c…7f9dbacked Over | 48c | 520$250 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$249.6 | 964 | 43.7%421 W · 543 L | -10.7wins | -0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -5.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x1f62…76f6backed Over | 48c | 515$250 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$249.75 | 1,208 | 42.2%510 W · 698 L | -27.4wins | -0.02per pick | 44cpaid | -7.7%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x7d0c…a3b7backed Over | 48c | 515$250 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$249.75 | 1,074 | 45%483 W · 591 L | -20.4wins | -0.02per pick | 47cpaid | -6.8%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x9c5b…ec01backed Over | 48c | 374.48$180 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$179.75 | 32 | 37.5%12 W · 20 L | -4.2wins | -0.13per pick | 51cpaid | -33.6%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0xc291…5d74backed Over | 48c | 321.5$154 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$154.32 | 1,615 | 34.9%564 W · 1,051 L | -28.7wins | -0.02per pick | 37cpaid | -13.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xa697…59d5backed Over | 48c | 300$144 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$144 | 553 | 51.9%287 W · 266 L | -1.0wins | 0.00per pick | 52cpaid | +0.3%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xe907…cff6backed Over | 51c | 296.9$151 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$151.42 | 532 | 40%213 W · 319 L | +2.7wins | +0.01per pick | 40cpaid | +3.4%equal weight | 510.00 edge/pick |
| 0xa3d1…de26backed Over | 51c | 49.02$25 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$25 | 34 | 50%17 W · 17 L | -0.9wins | -0.03per pick | 53cpaid | -19.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x1b04…403fbacked Over | 48c | 29.94$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.37 | 10 | 30%3 W · 7 L | -2.6wins | -0.26per pick | 56cpaid | -55.7%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x2f73…c2d5backed Over | 50c | 20$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10 | 3 | 66.7%2 W · 1 L | +0.5wins | +0.16per pick | 50cpaid | +32%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Premier League and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 5 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Ipswich Town FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 9.5 Total Cornersthis page
- Ipswich Town FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 10.5 Total CornersUnder won
- Ipswich Town FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 11.5 Total CornersUnder won
- Ipswich Town FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 7.5 Total CornersOver won
- Ipswich Town FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 8.5 Total CornersUnder won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.