TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

Premier League · resolved market

Spread: AFC Bournemouth (-1.5)

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
Nottingham Forest FCof AFC Bournemouth, Nottingham Forest FC
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
Premier Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$9,420
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$7,649

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $9,420 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 17 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Premier League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in Premier League
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0x204f…5e14backed Nottingham Forest FC78c2,535$1,976 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$559.736,04745.9%2,776 W · 3,271 L-21.5wins0.00per pick46cpaid-12.3%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xaf0f…3f10backed AFC Bournemouth27c1,713$462 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$462.422347.8%11 W · 12 L+0.9wins+0.04per pick44cpaid+13.2%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x0346…52a5backed AFC Bournemouth8c1,077$82 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$82.0881234.7%282 W · 530 L-24.2wins-0.03per pick38cpaid-26.4%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0x75fc…0a4cbacked AFC Bournemouth24c750$180 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1801040%4 W · 6 L+1.3wins+0.13per pick27cpaid+55%equal weight54+0.04 edge/pick
0x2b08…aaf4backed AFC Bournemouth27c640.74$173 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1735332.1%17 W · 36 L-8.6wins-0.16per pick48cpaid-41.1%equal weight38-0.11 edge/pick
0x0d2d…7ff5backed AFC Bournemouth5c450.38$22 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$22.254132.9%178 W · 363 L-28.6wins-0.05per pick38cpaid-31.9%equal weight44-0.05 edge/pick
0xa0a8…2282backed AFC Bournemouth27c361.11$97 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$971833.3%6 W · 12 L-2.6wins-0.14per pick48cpaid-45.3%equal weight43-0.06 edge/pick
0xefed…aecdbacked AFC Bournemouth27c243.85$66 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$65.841637.5%6 W · 10 L+2.3wins+0.15per pick23cpaid+51.7%equal weight56+0.06 edge/pick
0xcb1b…69f2backed Nottingham Forest FC73c188.46$138 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$505457.4%31 W · 23 L+2.8wins+0.05per pick52cpaid+12.7%equal weight54+0.03 edge/pick
0xc61d…3933backed AFC Bournemouth27c185.19$50 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$5012139.7%48 W · 73 L+1.8wins+0.01per pick38cpaid-5.4%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0xadfb…c2efbacked Nottingham Forest FC73c135.19$99 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$36.558446.1%269 W · 315 L-12.7wins-0.02per pick48cpaid-12.1%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x7d0c…a3b7backed Nottingham Forest FC76c130$99 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$31.21,07445%483 W · 591 L-20.4wins-0.02per pick47cpaid-6.8%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x066f…b576backed AFC Bournemouth26c94.98$25 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$24.6210534.3%36 W · 69 L-3.4wins-0.03per pick37cpaid-12.8%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0xc718…64a8backed Nottingham Forest FC74c65.05$48 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$16.9114463.2%91 W · 53 L+2.8wins+0.02per pick61cpaid+3.2%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x6e31…0e6ebacked Nottingham Forest FC74c54.05$40 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$14.051794.1%16 W · 1 L+3.7wins+0.22per pick73cpaid+29.5%equal weight60+0.09 edge/pick
0x1b44…6e8dbacked Nottingham Forest FC77c38.96$30 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$8.963461.8%21 W · 13 L+1.6wins+0.05per pick57cpaid+4.3%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0xdb83…1e50backed Nottingham Forest FC75c16$12 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$457847.8%276 W · 302 L+18.8wins+0.03per pick45cpaid+11.9%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Premier League and say nothing about this market.

The rest of this event

Polymarket sells these questions together. 11 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.