NHL · resolved market
AHL: Tucson Roadrunners vs. Bakersfield Condors
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xeb93a09b8a8136025b1059556eacac3aff34d1f3e85701150e64ffa16d3e66f3
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Bakersfield Condorsof Tucson Roadrunners, Bakersfield Condors
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- NHLevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $1,895
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $1,892
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $1,895 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 17 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in NHL is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in NHL | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xb8c8…d8a4backed Tucson Roadrunners | 48c | 1,049$503 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$503.32 | 149 | 40.9%61 W · 88 L | -4.3wins | -0.03per pick | 44cpaid | -5%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x428c…c64fbacked Bakersfield Condors | 52c | 553.26$288 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$265.57 | 2 | 100%2 W · 0 L | +1.0wins | +0.52per pick | 49cpaid | +107.3%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x8b44…63fbbacked Tucson Roadrunners | 49c | 420.55$206 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$206.07 | 18 | 33.3%6 W · 12 L | -1.8wins | -0.10per pick | 43cpaid | -28.8%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xa578…6702backed Bakersfield Condors | 51c | 377.5$194 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$183.51 | 538 | 49.4%266 W · 272 L | +10.5wins | +0.02per pick | 47cpaid | +3.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x14e4…eabbbacked Bakersfield Condors | 52c | 113.7$59 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$54.58 | 565 | 53.6%303 W · 262 L | +7.7wins | +0.01per pick | 52cpaid | +4.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x4488…579cbacked Bakersfield Condors | 52c | 88.34$46 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$42.4 | 347 | 52.4%182 W · 165 L | +0.2wins | 0.00per pick | 52cpaid | -2.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x8027…cf81backed Bakersfield Condors | 52c | 74.71$39 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$35.86 | 85 | 55.3%47 W · 38 L | +4.6wins | +0.05per pick | 50cpaid | +13.1%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x20a8…d960backed Tucson Roadrunners | 24c | 68.31$17 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$16.52 | 366 | 62%227 W · 139 L | +39.1wins | +0.11per pick | 51cpaid | +19.2%equal weight | 61+0.10 edge/pick |
| 0x5929…4684backed Tucson Roadrunners | 31c | 61.65$19 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.32 | 323 | 53.9%174 W · 149 L | +9.1wins | +0.03per pick | 51cpaid | -0.5%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x008d…b839backed Bakersfield Condors | 78c | 54.2$42 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11.94 | 450 | 69.3%312 W · 138 L | +51.6wins | +0.11per pick | 58cpaid | +16.1%equal weight | 62+0.11 edge/pick |
| 0x623a…5144backed Bakersfield Condors | 51c | 38.06$19 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$18.65 | 32 | 40.6%13 W · 19 L | -3.6wins | -0.11per pick | 52cpaid | -22.4%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x3a0e…b0babacked Bakersfield Condors | 51c | 38.06$19 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$18.65 | 98 | 46.9%46 W · 52 L | -0.9wins | -0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -0.8%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xae45…96b9backed Bakersfield Condors | 51c | 31.19$16 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.28 | 81 | 64.2%52 W · 29 L | +6.9wins | +0.08per pick | 56cpaid | +16.6%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x172b…e2cdbacked Bakersfield Condors | 58c | 24.52$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.3 | 17 | 52.9%9 W · 8 L | -0.3wins | -0.02per pick | 55cpaid | -9.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xe911…3d4ebacked Bakersfield Condors | 73c | 23.67$17 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6.38 | 1,384 | 47.1%652 W · 732 L | +25.6wins | +0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -1.2%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xfc7e…70ecbacked Bakersfield Condors | 53c | 20$11 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$9.4 | 203 | 50.7%103 W · 100 L | +5.1wins | +0.03per pick | 48cpaid | +5.7%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x0b45…ac9fbacked Bakersfield Condors | 71c | 17.5$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$5.01 | 133 | 43.6%58 W · 75 L | -4.9wins | -0.04per pick | 47cpaid | -16.3%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in NHL and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.