AI · resolved market
Will the next Google Gemini model added to the Arena Leaderboard debut at a score of at least 1490?
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xf08ff2f7bd9c9512a9264c80159635071b46cdce992b435a64b07f65a2912681
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Noof Yes, No
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- AIevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $5,740
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $5,138
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $5,740 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 11 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in AI is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in AI | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xa7d2…f954backed Yes | 12c | 1,000$120 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$120 | 88 | 53.4%47 W · 41 L | +13.9wins | +0.16per pick | 38cpaid | +27.3%equal weight | 64+0.12 edge/pick |
| 0x714f…66d5backed Yes | 19c | 542.34$105 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$105.36 | 70 | 30%21 W · 49 L | +3.2wins | +0.05per pick | 25cpaid | +34.2%equal weight | 54+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xeab6…d4c6backed Yes | 13c | 300$39 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$39 | 37 | 18.9%7 W · 30 L | +0.6wins | +0.02per pick | 17cpaid | -32%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x9aeb…2729backed No | 67c | 239.14$161 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$78.5 | 118 | 55.9%66 W · 52 L | +11.0wins | +0.09per pick | 47cpaid | +5.8%equal weight | 59+0.08 edge/pick |
| 0x3ad4…dea4backed Yes | 8c | 201$16 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$16 | 2 | 0%0 W · 2 L | -0.2wins | -0.08per pick | 8cpaid | -100%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x92c0…eefdbacked Yes | 18c | 154.99$27 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$27.25 | 2 | 0%0 W · 2 L | -0.3wins | -0.14per pick | 14cpaid | -100%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x7d26…a7d1backed Yes | 14c | 122.8$17 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$17.19 | 38 | 31.6%12 W · 26 L | -3.9wins | -0.10per pick | 42cpaid | -31.7%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x0a0c…74f9backed Yes | 36c | 58.14$21 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20.93 | 18 | 38.9%7 W · 11 L | -1.9wins | -0.10per pick | 49cpaid | +8.8%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xcdf5…e344backed Yes | 26c | 50$13 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13 | 12 | 33.3%4 W · 8 L | -1.1wins | -0.09per pick | 42cpaid | -31.7%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xc10b…96d5backed No | 70c | 20$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6 | 26 | 42.3%11 W · 15 L | -2.9wins | -0.11per pick | 53cpaid | -21.3%equal weight | 44-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x6dec…cefabacked No | 78c | 15.55$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$3.39 | 35 | 60%21 W · 14 L | +4.0wins | +0.11per pick | 49cpaid | +7.5%equal weight | 57+0.07 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in AI and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 7 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Will the next Google Gemini model added to the Arena Leaderboard debut at a score of at least 1490?this page
- Will the next Google Gemini model added to the Arena Leaderboard debut at a score of at least 1460?Yes won
- Will the next Google Gemini model added to the Arena Leaderboard debut at a score of at least 1470?Yes won
- Will the next Google Gemini model added to the Arena Leaderboard debut at a score of at least 1480?Yes won
- Will the next Google Gemini model added to the Arena Leaderboard debut at a score of at least 1500?No won
- Will the next Google Gemini model added to the Arena Leaderboard debut at a score of at least 1510?No won
- Will the next Google Gemini model added to the Arena Leaderboard debut at a score of at least 1520?No won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.