Asian League · resolved market
FC Mito Holly Hock vs. Urawa Red Diamonds: Both Teams to Score
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xf3798bed9d269ceedf14f1337e99d1a9a6063dd74a430daca42e7874c0a58fc5
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Yesof Yes, No
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Asian Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $2,935
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $3,593
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $2,935 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 12 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Asian League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Asian League | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x106b…4e8bbacked Yes | 49c | 318.37$156 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$162.37 | 21 | 28.6%6 W · 15 L | -2.3wins | -0.11per pick | 39cpaid | -26.5%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xf859…c775backed Yes | 46c | 111.11$51 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$60 | 10 | 30%3 W · 7 L | -0.2wins | -0.02per pick | 32cpaid | -38.1%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xba67…4727backed No | 51c | 100.99$52 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$51.51 | 183 | 53.6%98 W · 85 L | +7.3wins | +0.04per pick | 50cpaid | +7.6%equal weight | 54+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Yes | 18c | 84.49$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$69.62 | 5,946 | 46.1%2,743 W · 3,203 L | +50.5wins | +0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -6.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x2e95…2bb7backed Yes | 49c | 53.06$26 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$27.06 | 41 | 41.5%17 W · 24 L | +0.1wins | 0.00per pick | 41cpaid | -12.4%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x33af…288abacked Yes | 40c | 50$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$30 | 387 | 37.5%145 W · 242 L | -1.7wins | 0.00per pick | 38cpaid | -0.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x2fcb…78cfbacked No | 51c | 41.49$21 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$21.16 | 60 | 60%36 W · 24 L | +5.8wins | +0.10per pick | 50cpaid | +18.4%equal weight | 58+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0xd337…7564backed Yes | 48c | 40.31$19 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$21.11 | 6 | 66.7%4 W · 2 L | +1.0wins | +0.17per pick | 49cpaid | +26.1%equal weight | 54+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xfa52…eababacked No | 52c | 38.54$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.94 | 16 | 18.8%3 W · 13 L | -4.9wins | -0.30per pick | 49cpaid | -64.2%equal weight | 37-0.12 edge/pick |
| 0x2b35…0bfebacked No | 52c | 30$16 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15.6 | 423 | 51.3%217 W · 206 L | +2.4wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | +2.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked No | 52c | 25.31$13 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.16 | 2,522 | 42.3%1,067 W · 1,455 L | +54.6wins | +0.02per pick | 40cpaid | -5.9%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x7203…795abacked Yes | 70c | 14.5$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$4.35 | 157 | 72%113 W · 44 L | +33.9wins | +0.22per pick | 50cpaid | +63.8%equal weight | 71+0.19 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Asian League and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 8 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- FC Mito Holly Hock vs. Urawa Red Diamonds: Both Teams to Scorethis page
- FC Mito Holly Hock vs. Urawa Red Diamonds: O/U 1.5Over won
- FC Mito Holly Hock vs. Urawa Red Diamonds: O/U 2.5Over won
- FC Mito Holly Hock vs. Urawa Red Diamonds: O/U 3.5Over won
- FC Mito Holly Hock vs. Urawa Red Diamonds: O/U 4.5Over won
- Spread: FC Mito Holly Hock (-1.5)Urawa Red Diamonds won
- Spread: Urawa Red Diamonds (-1.5)Urawa Red Diamonds won
- Spread: Urawa Red Diamonds (-2.5)Urawa Red Diamonds won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.