Premier League · resolved market
Hull City AFC vs. Stoke City FC: Both Teams to Score
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xf6a5f6d580059193bab721c67a4c4d448a2735ff304c1b55ef78a8e6dce0626c
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Noof Yes, No
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Premier Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $2,174
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $1,966
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $2,174 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 14 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Premier League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Premier League | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x204f…5e14backed No | 45c | 1,016$459 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$557.4 | 6,117 | 45.8%2,803 W · 3,314 L | -28.6wins | 0.00per pick | 46cpaid | -12.4%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0xd120…19fcbacked Yes | 54c | 733.96$400 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$400 | 32 | 34.4%11 W · 21 L | -5.0wins | -0.16per pick | 50cpaid | -32.8%equal weight | 40-0.09 edge/pick |
| 0x3c49…ca9dbacked Yes | 60c | 340$204 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$204 | 28 | 39.3%11 W · 17 L | -3.4wins | -0.12per pick | 51cpaid | -28.2%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x42b5…0dd9backed No | 45c | 265.96$120 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$146.28 | 239 | 20.9%50 W · 189 L | -4.7wins | -0.02per pick | 23cpaid | -11.8%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Yes | 10c | 169.63$17 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$16.88 | 4,768 | 41.8%1,993 W · 2,775 L | +28.2wins | +0.01per pick | 41cpaid | -14.2%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xd0a0…35cdbacked Yes | 60c | 167$100 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$100.2 | 100 | 51%51 W · 49 L | -2.8wins | -0.03per pick | 54cpaid | -3.4%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xdbdd…a5debacked No | 35c | 156.51$54 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$102.15 | 742 | 56.9%422 W · 320 L | +46.5wins | +0.06per pick | 51cpaid | +11.1%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0xa354…b85fbacked Yes | 66c | 151.51$100 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$100 | 241 | 58.1%140 W · 101 L | +34.1wins | +0.14per pick | 44cpaid | +36.3%equal weight | 64+0.13 edge/pick |
| 0x7ad7…c097backed Yes | 52c | 110$57 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$57.2 | 36 | 19.4%7 W · 29 L | -4.5wins | -0.12per pick | 32cpaid | -33.3%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x706c…7752backed Yes | 37c | 100$37 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$37 | 14 | 42.9%6 W · 8 L | -0.5wins | -0.04per pick | 47cpaid | -9.6%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x858d…9d9fbacked Yes | 54c | 92.59$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 46 | 26.1%12 W · 34 L | -3.1wins | -0.07per pick | 33cpaid | -25.2%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x5fa6…03ebbacked No | 45c | 51$23 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$28.05 | 119 | 55.5%66 W · 53 L | +13.0wins | +0.11per pick | 45cpaid | +23.7%equal weight | 60+0.09 edge/pick |
| 0x77bc…b91bbacked No | 46c | 49$23 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$26.27 | 1,938 | 42.5%823 W · 1,115 L | -41.5wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -17.6%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xc8b5…5414backed No | 57c | 18.12$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$7.79 | 8 | 37.5%3 W · 5 L | -0.9wins | -0.11per pick | 49cpaid | -39.2%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Premier League and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 6 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Hull City AFC vs. Stoke City FC: Both Teams to Scorethis page
- Hull City AFC vs. Stoke City FC: O/U 1.5Under won
- Hull City AFC vs. Stoke City FC: O/U 2.5Under won
- Hull City AFC vs. Stoke City FC: O/U 3.5Under won
- Hull City AFC vs. Stoke City FC: O/U 4.5Under won
- Spread: Hull City AFC (-1.5)Stoke City FC won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.