TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

Tennis · resolved market

Nottingham 3: Daniel de Jonge vs Emile Hudd

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
Daniel de Jongeof Daniel de Jonge, Emile Hudd
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$12,586
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$12,854

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $12,586 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 44 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in Tennis
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0x5268…135dbacked Emile Hudd22c763.74$170 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$170.474,18544.7%1,871 W · 2,314 L+14.9wins0.00per pick44cpaid-17.3%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x98db…dd17backed Daniel de Jonge67c707.27$474 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$232.825,35056.4%3,016 W · 2,334 L+228.4wins+0.04per pick52cpaid-6.4%equal weight55+0.04 edge/pick
0xfe78…0319backed Emile Hudd28c603.9$168 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$167.978,82836.1%3,190 W · 5,638 L-193.3wins-0.02per pick38cpaid-27.2%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x0d2d…7ff5backed Emile Hudd37c475.15$176 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$176.298,50542.6%3,619 W · 4,886 L-166.3wins-0.02per pick45cpaid-21.3%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x0c99…0c88backed Daniel de Jonge67c464.81$313 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$151.719,28644.3%4,110 W · 5,176 L-245.7wins-0.03per pick47cpaid-12.1%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0x85d5…bbf0backed Daniel de Jonge36c429.99$155 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$274.8130530.8%94 W · 211 L-9.5wins-0.03per pick34cpaid-13.8%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0x2ad5…62ffbacked Emile Hudd45c426.7$194 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$194.031,22823.1%284 W · 944 L-164.0wins-0.13per pick36cpaid-47%equal weight35-0.13 edge/pick
0x3e43…0306backed Emile Hudd49c379$186 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$186.4332726.9%88 W · 239 L-43.6wins-0.13per pick40cpaid-41.3%equal weight36-0.12 edge/pick
0x84ad…bfb7backed Daniel de Jonge77c329.79$255 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$75.074,53367.7%3,071 W · 1,462 L+306.6wins+0.07per pick61cpaid+5.2%equal weight57+0.07 edge/pick
0xde9f…d43cbacked Daniel de Jonge62c287.25$179 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$107.776,59950.7%3,343 W · 3,256 L+259.7wins+0.04per pick47cpaid-4.9%equal weight54+0.04 edge/pick
0xeea3…a6a2backed Emile Hudd51c240.69$124 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$123.953,06857.3%1,757 W · 1,311 L+173.3wins+0.06per pick52cpaid-3.6%equal weight56+0.06 edge/pick
0x01c7…e995backed Daniel de Jonge37c220.91$82 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$139.172,46238.5%948 W · 1,514 L+93.1wins+0.04per pick35cpaid+13.9%equal weight54+0.04 edge/pick
0x6485…a265backed Daniel de Jonge69c185.34$129 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$56.782,28152%1,187 W · 1,094 L+82.3wins+0.04per pick48cpaid+3.5%equal weight54+0.04 edge/pick
0xe911…3d4ebacked Emile Hudd24c168$41 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$40.694,42651.8%2,291 W · 2,135 L+136.7wins+0.03per pick49cpaid+0.4%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0x2f26…0d8fbacked Emile Hudd46c155$72 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$71.591,53240.7%624 W · 908 L-48.7wins-0.03per pick44cpaid-20.1%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0x3cad…92f0backed Emile Hudd34c103.15$35 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$353,22040.5%1,305 W · 1,915 L+28.3wins+0.01per pick40cpaid+2.4%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x133a…504abacked Emile Hudd34c102.94$35 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$353,42439.1%1,338 W · 2,086 L-12.3wins0.00per pick39cpaid-1%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xccd8…f4debacked Daniel de Jonge38c102.56$39 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$63.581,47535.2%519 W · 956 L-14.1wins-0.01per pick36cpaid-4.4%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x6770…c3bdbacked Daniel de Jonge43c100$43 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$57.592352.5%485 W · 438 L+10.2wins+0.01per pick51cpaid-3.7%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0xe8e0…7eecbacked Daniel de Jonge43c100$43 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$57.51,17552.9%622 W · 553 L+2.3wins0.00per pick53cpaid-3.9%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x8a80…11c5backed Daniel de Jonge43c100$43 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$57.573951.7%382 W · 357 L-4.9wins-0.01per pick52cpaid-6.5%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x7e50…4b22backed Emile Hudd62c99.99$62 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$61.9935457.3%203 W · 151 L+1.2wins0.00per pick57cpaid+2.2%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x31e7…fe2abacked Emile Hudd34c88.24$30 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$301,35638.3%520 W · 836 L+2.2wins0.00per pick38cpaid-1.1%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x4060…e63cbacked Emile Hudd59c84.75$50 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$5027437.2%102 W · 172 L-21.9wins-0.08per pick45cpaid-14.5%equal weight42-0.07 edge/pick
0xf1ee…519cbacked Daniel de Jonge47c80$37 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$42.655360.4%334 W · 219 L+32.7wins+0.06per pick54cpaid+2.5%equal weight56+0.06 edge/pick
0x204f…5e14backed Daniel de Jonge62c74.48$46 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$288,21745.5%3,737 W · 4,480 L+166.6wins+0.02per pick43cpaid-16.3%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xe519…2f48backed Emile Hudd39c54.49$21 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$2114435.4%51 W · 93 L-4.6wins-0.03per pick39cpaid-9.3%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0x42c9…9623backed Daniel de Jonge55c50.26$27 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$22.84,70349.4%2,323 W · 2,380 L+166.5wins+0.04per pick46cpaid-3.7%equal weight54+0.04 edge/pick
0x076d…8d4cbacked Daniel de Jonge30c44.03$13 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$30.824,24152.6%2,232 W · 2,009 L+65.0wins+0.02per pick51cpaid-1.6%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xfb77…1c78backed Emile Hudd36c41.67$15 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$152,15137.3%802 W · 1,349 L-27.2wins-0.01per pick39cpaid-5%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0xf18a…e4e5backed Daniel de Jonge78c38.08$30 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$8.342,34351.6%1,209 W · 1,134 L+95.2wins+0.04per pick48cpaid+0.3%equal weight54+0.04 edge/pick
0xc2be…af12backed Emile Hudd50c37$19 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$18.52,03246.9%952 W · 1,080 L-12.4wins-0.01per pick47cpaid-7.2%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x2005…75eabacked Daniel de Jonge54c35.79$19 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$16.5911,43543.4%4,959 W · 6,476 L+17.8wins0.00per pick43cpaid-20.1%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xe564…221abacked Emile Hudd31c34.72$11 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$10.715841.4%24 W · 34 L+4.5wins+0.08per pick34cpaid+17.3%equal weight56+0.05 edge/pick
0x39f6…c6efbacked Emile Hudd35c33$11 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$11.426640.6%108 W · 158 L+4.9wins+0.02per pick39cpaid-11.4%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x7d9a…05e6backed Daniel de Jonge61c32.01$20 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$12.492,08544.5%928 W · 1,157 L-51.6wins-0.02per pick47cpaid-22.7%equal weight47-0.02 edge/pick
0xf970…f7f6backed Emile Hudd63c32$20 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$20.162,48535.9%893 W · 1,592 L-28.5wins-0.01per pick37cpaid-5.2%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x9888…e6febacked Daniel de Jonge35c30$11 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$19.52,44745.9%1,123 W · 1,324 L-12.9wins-0.01per pick46cpaid-5.7%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0xd4f9…84f7backed Emile Hudd47c30$14 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$14.135349.9%176 W · 177 L-2.3wins-0.01per pick51cpaid-5.5%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x60ec…f7b0backed Daniel de Jonge60c23.29$14 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$9.22,06148.6%1,002 W · 1,059 L+35.6wins+0.02per pick47cpaid-8.2%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x77de…e67abacked Daniel de Jonge47c21.28$10 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$11.2862549.6%310 W · 315 L-4.8wins-0.01per pick50cpaid-3.5%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x985d…33c9backed Emile Hudd61c20.48$12 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$12.491,30036.9%480 W · 820 L-34.2wins-0.03per pick40cpaid-4.8%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0xab8b…24ffbacked Daniel de Jonge69c16.12$11 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$5.022937.9%11 W · 18 L-5.1wins-0.18per pick56cpaid-38.8%equal weight39-0.09 edge/pick
0xdb83…1e50backed Daniel de Jonge77c15$12 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$3.53,66145.2%1,654 W · 2,007 L-8.7wins0.00per pick45cpaid-12.2%equal weight500.00 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.