TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

MLB · resolved market

Chicago Cubs vs. San Diego Padres

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
San Diego Padresof Chicago Cubs, San Diego Padres
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
MLBevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$27,796
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$27,185

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $27,796 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 19 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in MLB is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in MLB
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0xd9a0…88eebacked San Diego Padres28c20,001$5,583 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$14,417.828348.8%138 W · 145 L+6.3wins+0.02per pick47cpaid+2.7%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xb786…b18dbacked Chicago Cubs72c13,503$9,722 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$9,722.161,59150.3%801 W · 790 L+68.9wins+0.04per pick46cpaid+1.4%equal weight55+0.04 edge/pick
0xa6a8…5009backed Chicago Cubs72c4,998$3,598 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$3,598.322,27443.2%983 W · 1,291 L+43.8wins+0.02per pick41cpaid-8.7%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x714d…6e05backed Chicago Cubs56c1,339$750 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$7506437.5%24 W · 40 L-5.8wins-0.09per pick47cpaid-21.9%equal weight43-0.07 edge/pick
0x481b…74c1backed Chicago Cubs42c1,283$537 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$536.6679740.4%322 W · 475 L-19.1wins-0.02per pick43cpaid-15.4%equal weight47-0.02 edge/pick
0x480d…f219backed Chicago Cubs59c1,000$585 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$585.121,25052.2%653 W · 597 L-5.0wins0.00per pick53cpaid-1.1%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x994e…9cf5backed San Diego Padres44c738.83$325 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$413.7421147.9%101 W · 110 L+1.4wins+0.01per pick47cpaid+0.5%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x29c0…efaabacked Chicago Cubs55c602.22$331 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$331.221,21252.1%631 W · 581 L+21.3wins+0.02per pick50cpaid+3.2%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xe401…7b88backed San Diego Padres27c418.29$114 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$304.449,72846.3%4,506 W · 5,222 L+32.8wins0.00per pick46cpaid-8.5%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x24df…e8b2backed San Diego Padres42c311.35$132 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$179.491,20344.2%532 W · 671 L+20.5wins+0.02per pick43cpaid-1.1%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x8b7e…6a9fbacked San Diego Padres45c222.22$100 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$122.222,03352.4%1,066 W · 967 L-35.5wins-0.02per pick54cpaid-3.2%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x5530…d38dbacked San Diego Padres45c200$90 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$1102,20350.3%1,108 W · 1,095 L+29.6wins+0.01per pick49cpaid-0.9%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x5ea5…2af9backed Chicago Cubs51c196.08$100 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1006149.2%30 W · 31 L-4.6wins-0.07per pick57cpaid-15%equal weight44-0.05 edge/pick
0xdc4b…5a92backed San Diego Padres45c111.11$50 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$61.112,26753.3%1,208 W · 1,059 L-12.4wins-0.01per pick54cpaid-1%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0xd10a…91e9backed Chicago Cubs57c70$40 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$39.911953.8%64 W · 55 L-3.7wins-0.03per pick57cpaid-5.7%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0xa337…9e54backed San Diego Padres45c55.56$25 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$30.5694455.3%522 W · 422 L-2.9wins0.00per pick56cpaid-0.7%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xef63…96cbbacked San Diego Padres45c50$23 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$27.546753.7%251 W · 216 L-11.0wins-0.02per pick56cpaid-5.5%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x0643…d46bbacked Chicago Cubs57c40.35$23 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$2340557.8%234 W · 171 L+7.6wins+0.02per pick56cpaid+3.3%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x3dd4…1b50backed San Diego Padres44c23.18$10 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$12.982,04553.8%1,100 W · 945 L+32.7wins+0.02per pick52cpaid+3.8%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in MLB and say nothing about this market.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.