Mls · resolved market
San Jose Earthquakes vs. Vancouver Whitecaps FC: O/U 1.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x5f1203790a04dd5a5e38455caf5b37285eed08b36884019e94ff01ea3e44030e
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Overof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Mlsevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $6,014
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $6,446
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $6,014 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 20 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Mls is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Mls | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x0346…52a5backed Over | 73c | 1,221$897 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$324.71 | 989 | 45.4%449 W · 540 L | -23.9wins | -0.02per pick | 48cpaid | -13.2%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x1f3f…5878backed Under | 16c | 1,215$200 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$200.48 | 14 | 21.4%3 W · 11 L | +0.4wins | +0.03per pick | 19cpaid | -4.1%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x8e8c…65ddbacked Under | 40c | 670.25$265 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$265.1 | 29 | 34.5%10 W · 19 L | -3.1wins | -0.11per pick | 45cpaid | -31.6%equal weight | 44-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x3b5c…126ebacked Under | 16c | 660.76$105 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$105.36 | 157 | 48.4%76 W · 81 L | -0.6wins | 0.00per pick | 49cpaid | +0.3%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Under | 16c | 385$62 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$61.6 | 3,012 | 43.5%1,311 W · 1,701 L | -29.7wins | -0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -9.8%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x4c10…b6a4backed Under | 41c | 256.32$105 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$105 | 2 | 50%1 W · 1 L | -0.2wins | -0.10per pick | 60cpaid | -37%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x7ea5…de7bbacked Under | 16c | 242.16$39 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$38.75 | 971 | 46.1%448 W · 523 L | -6.1wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -5.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xb595…5922backed Over | 72c | 172.6$124 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$48.33 | 29 | 75.9%22 W · 7 L | +3.6wins | +0.12per pick | 63cpaid | +25.2%equal weight | 57+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0xd1ed…d7cbbacked Over | 66c | 171$113 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$57.6 | 193 | 47.2%91 W · 102 L | +4.3wins | +0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -9.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x6770…5bdfbacked Over | 64c | 170$109 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$61.2 | 14 | 50%7 W · 7 L | -0.9wins | -0.06per pick | 56cpaid | -25%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xdc4f…9804backed Under | 16c | 152.52$24 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$24.37 | 351 | 49.6%174 W · 177 L | -3.7wins | -0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -1.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x16e5…6373backed Over | 72c | 140$101 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$39.2 | 7 | 71.4%5 W · 2 L | +1.2wins | +0.17per pick | 55cpaid | +29.8%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x80d8…b703backed Under | 28c | 100$28 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$28 | 259 | 34.4%89 W · 170 L | -28.1wins | -0.11per pick | 45cpaid | -31.5%equal weight | 39-0.10 edge/pick |
| 0x0c99…0c88backed Under | 28c | 99.99$28 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$28 | 392 | 34.4%135 W · 257 L | -47.2wins | -0.12per pick | 46cpaid | -31%equal weight | 37-0.11 edge/pick |
| 0x2f26…0d8fbacked Over | 66c | 68.62$45 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$23.13 | 304 | 44.1%134 W · 170 L | -0.3wins | 0.00per pick | 44cpaid | -11.5%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x5df5…c44cbacked Over | 80c | 60.87$48 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$12.44 | 360 | 51.9%187 W · 173 L | +2.3wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -7.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xbe31…b42dbacked Under | 18c | 58.64$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.32 | 6 | 83.3%5 W · 1 L | +1.7wins | +0.29per pick | 55cpaid | +41%equal weight | 56+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x84ad…bfb7backed Under | 38c | 37.16$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.12 | 783 | 44.4%348 W · 435 L | -30.2wins | -0.04per pick | 48cpaid | -18.8%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x1262…2fc9backed Over | 72c | 27.39$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$7.67 | 65 | 63.1%41 W · 24 L | +5.9wins | +0.09per pick | 54cpaid | +18.1%equal weight | 57+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x4676…b720backed Over | 70c | 20.24$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$5.98 | 29 | 72.4%21 W · 8 L | +3.3wins | +0.11per pick | 61cpaid | +12.4%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Mls and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 6 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- San Jose Earthquakes vs. Vancouver Whitecaps FC: O/U 1.5this page
- San Jose Earthquakes vs. Vancouver Whitecaps FC: Both Teams to ScoreYes won
- San Jose Earthquakes vs. Vancouver Whitecaps FC: O/U 2.5Under won
- San Jose Earthquakes vs. Vancouver Whitecaps FC: O/U 3.5Under won
- San Jose Earthquakes vs. Vancouver Whitecaps FC: O/U 4.5Under won
- Spread: Vancouver Whitecaps FC (-1.5)San Jose Earthquakes won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.