South American Leagues · resolved market
Santos FC vs. SC Internacional: Both Teams to Score
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x6d1641be81eeacb1b6ef0c492300a6ab029fee055602aaf7d29198a3eb62306e
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Yesof Yes, No
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- South American Leaguesevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- Polymarket published no figure
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $4,098
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $4,098 — TailMyPicks’s own total, because the venue published none.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 15 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in South American Leagues is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in South American Leagues | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x204f…5e14backed No | 46c | 563.13$257 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$257.15 | 8,107 | 48.7%3,948 W · 4,159 L | +26.8wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | -8.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Yes | 46c | 412.39$189 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$223.38 | 5,757 | 45.4%2,611 W · 3,146 L | +94.0wins | +0.02per pick | 44cpaid | -7.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xd179…361ebacked Yes | 34c | 406.09$138 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$268.02 | 20 | 60%12 W · 8 L | +5.5wins | +0.27per pick | 33cpaid | +82.4%equal weight | 64+0.12 edge/pick |
| 0x5dc4…99adbacked No | 67c | 299.1$200 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$200 | 8 | 37.5%3 W · 5 L | -1.7wins | -0.21per pick | 59cpaid | -49.1%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xb253…26febacked No | 57c | 175.44$100 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$100 | 51 | 62.7%32 W · 19 L | +2.2wins | +0.04per pick | 59cpaid | +4.5%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x1cdd…e595backed Yes | 39c | 130$51 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$79.15 | 852 | 20.7%176 W · 676 L | -85.2wins | -0.10per pick | 31cpaid | -52.5%equal weight | 39-0.10 edge/pick |
| 0x94f9…e1b8backed No | 46c | 85.8$39 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$39.47 | 88 | 43.2%38 W · 50 L | +3.5wins | +0.04per pick | 39cpaid | +0.6%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xc4db…7e0cbacked Yes | 54c | 85.8$46 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$39.47 | 337 | 45.4%153 W · 184 L | +4.4wins | +0.01per pick | 44cpaid | +3.1%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xc291…5d74backed No | 52c | 76.84$40 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$39.92 | 3,749 | 38.2%1,431 W · 2,318 L | -33.3wins | -0.01per pick | 39cpaid | -8.2%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x6ec3…d1eebacked Yes | 59c | 47.17$28 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$19.34 | 2 | 50%1 W · 1 L | 0.0wins | -0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -15.3%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x26c3…e26dbacked Yes | 45c | 44.44$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$24.44 | 6 | 33.3%2 W · 4 L | -0.5wins | -0.09per pick | 42cpaid | +2.2%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2043…6407backed Yes | 57c | 40.09$23 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$17.24 | 2 | 50%1 W · 1 L | -0.1wins | -0.05per pick | 55cpaid | -12.3%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x2c46…dac9backed Yes | 57c | 35.79$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.47 | 1,253 | 56.2%704 W · 549 L | +73.3wins | +0.06per pick | 50cpaid | +10.6%equal weight | 56+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0xa4d4…ef77backed Yes | 40c | 25$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15 | 35 | 45.7%16 W · 19 L | +2.2wins | +0.06per pick | 39cpaid | +20.6%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x77bc…b91bbacked No | 55c | 18.83$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.35 | 2,170 | 43.7%948 W · 1,222 L | -53.8wins | -0.02per pick | 46cpaid | -19.4%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in South American Leagues and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 7 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Santos FC vs. SC Internacional: Both Teams to Scorethis page
- Santos FC vs. SC Internacional: O/U 1.5Over won
- Santos FC vs. SC Internacional: O/U 2.5Over won
- Santos FC vs. SC Internacional: O/U 3.5Under won
- Santos FC vs. SC Internacional: O/U 4.5Under won
- Spread: SC Internacional (-1.5)Santos FC won
- Spread: Santos FC (-1.5)SC Internacional won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.