Lol · resolved market
LoL: Verdant vs The Ruddy Sack - Game 1 Winner
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x77287c7f05cee3977ead069b5311ed68100b687ac13dd1c801e7261724300256
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Verdantof Verdant, The Ruddy Sack
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Lolevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $8,818
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $9,361
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $8,818 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 13 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Lol is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Lol | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xac75…1319backed Verdant | 79c | 3,836$3,038 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$797.59 | 233 | 51.1%119 W · 114 L | +7.9wins | +0.03per pick | 48cpaid | +6.7%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x048f…9992backed The Ruddy Sack | 1c | 2,000$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 592 | 0%0 W · 592 L | -7.0wins | -0.01per pick | 1cpaid | -100%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x52b7…0aa1backed The Ruddy Sack | 22c | 1,500$330 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$330 | 1,468 | 28.9%424 W · 1,044 L | +23.5wins | +0.02per pick | 27cpaid | +3.9%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xb4d2…ce99backed The Ruddy Sack | 22c | 1,310$288 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$288.23 | 2,202 | 33.3%733 W · 1,469 L | -72.4wins | -0.03per pick | 37cpaid | -21.4%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x6918…782bbacked Verdant | 75c | 858.7$641 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$218.1 | 1,501 | 54.5%818 W · 683 L | +34.5wins | +0.02per pick | 52cpaid | +5.1%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xf34a…710cbacked The Ruddy Sack | 22c | 677.27$149 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$149 | 7 | 0%0 W · 7 L | -1.9wins | -0.27per pick | 27cpaid | -100%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x8e34…4480backed The Ruddy Sack | 27c | 500$135 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$135 | 413 | 43.8%181 W · 232 L | -3.5wins | -0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -1.8%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5de7…5417backed The Ruddy Sack | 23c | 250$58 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$57.5 | 282 | 40.4%114 W · 168 L | -2.7wins | -0.01per pick | 41cpaid | +0.9%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xc4fe…601fbacked The Ruddy Sack | 17c | 132.22$23 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$23 | 1,971 | 30.5%601 W · 1,370 L | -170.0wins | -0.09per pick | 39cpaid | -43.4%equal weight | 41-0.09 edge/pick |
| 0x6e31…0e6ebacked Verdant | 78c | 96.15$75 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$21.15 | 238 | 80.3%191 W · 47 L | +16.2wins | +0.07per pick | 73cpaid | +9%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0xc0ca…35f7backed The Ruddy Sack | 22c | 91.67$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20.17 | 2 | 0%0 W · 2 L | -0.7wins | -0.34per pick | 34cpaid | -100%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x0d2d…7ff5backed The Ruddy Sack | 22c | 75$16 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$16.25 | 1,826 | 39.9%728 W · 1,098 L | -61.4wins | -0.03per pick | 43cpaid | -20.9%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x2ca2…1798backed Verdant | 73c | 21$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$5.75 | 55 | 67.3%37 W · 18 L | -1.5wins | -0.03per pick | 70cpaid | -5.6%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Lol and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 6 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- LoL: Verdant vs The Ruddy Sack - Game 1 Winnerthis page
- Game Handicap: VDN (-1.5) vs The Ruddy Sack (+1.5)Verdant won
- Games Total: O/U 3.5Under won
- LoL: Verdant vs The Ruddy Sack (BO5) - NLC PlayoffsVerdant won
- LoL: Verdant vs The Ruddy Sack - Game 2 WinnerVerdant won
- LoL: Verdant vs The Ruddy Sack - Game 3 WinnerVerdant won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.