Tennis · resolved market
ITF Bakio: Roberto Perez Socas vs Emile Hudd
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x777df0a1303019b682f43d6c639f67d333f1a1de1f5e57fd91dee50b614adc30
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Emile Huddof Roberto Perez Socas, Emile Hudd
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $1,960
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $1,982
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $1,960 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 18 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x4c10…b6a4backed Emile Hudd | 66c | 454.82$300 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$154.82 | 189 | 47.6%90 W · 99 L | -6.7wins | -0.04per pick | 51cpaid | -3.6%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xb4d2…ce99backed Roberto Perez Socas | 32c | 414.49$133 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$132.52 | 4,975 | 38.6%1,922 W · 3,053 L | -19.9wins | 0.00per pick | 39cpaid | -7.3%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xc4fe…601fbacked Emile Hudd | 48c | 311.6$148 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$163.39 | 6,574 | 46.2%3,037 W · 3,537 L | -45.5wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -12.9%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x076d…8d4cbacked Emile Hudd | 62c | 275.22$171 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$104.01 | 4,341 | 52.3%2,271 W · 2,070 L | +63.3wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -2%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x6770…5bdfbacked Emile Hudd | 69c | 115.07$79 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$35.67 | 969 | 45.9%445 W · 524 L | +7.7wins | +0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -3.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xa373…b6dcbacked Roberto Perez Socas | 59c | 84.55$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 543 | 48.1%261 W · 282 L | +0.2wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | -0.6%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xa0be…e6c2backed Roberto Perez Socas | 65c | 76.92$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 42 | 47.6%20 W · 22 L | -0.4wins | -0.01per pick | 49cpaid | +5.2%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x133a…504abacked Roberto Perez Socas | 48c | 72.54$35 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$34.82 | 3,457 | 38.9%1,345 W · 2,112 L | -15.1wins | 0.00per pick | 39cpaid | -1.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xd9c9…6686backed Roberto Perez Socas | 43c | 67.46$29 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$29.03 | 1,337 | 46%615 W · 722 L | +23.1wins | +0.02per pick | 44cpaid | +0.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x31e7…fe2abacked Roberto Perez Socas | 48c | 64.31$31 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30.87 | 1,356 | 38.3%520 W · 836 L | +2.2wins | 0.00per pick | 38cpaid | -1.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x6fb2…bd2dbacked Roberto Perez Socas | 48c | 62.68$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30 | 165 | 49.7%82 W · 83 L | +0.4wins | 0.00per pick | 49cpaid | -2.7%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x8c97…5c66backed Roberto Perez Socas | 48c | 62.5$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30 | 483 | 55.1%266 W · 217 L | +7.4wins | +0.02per pick | 54cpaid | +2.4%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xdbdd…a5debacked Roberto Perez Socas | 47c | 54.41$25 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$25.43 | 6,512 | 54.5%3,546 W · 2,966 L | +289.8wins | +0.04per pick | 50cpaid | +26.1%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x09da…50bcbacked Roberto Perez Socas | 51c | 48.57$25 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$24.98 | 405 | 50.6%205 W · 200 L | +13.5wins | +0.03per pick | 47cpaid | +7.1%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x0d2d…7ff5backed Emile Hudd | 56c | 41.05$23 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$18 | 8,702 | 42.6%3,708 W · 4,994 L | -165.1wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -21.2%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x0457…af98backed Roberto Perez Socas | 56c | 35$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.64 | 1 | 0%0 W · 1 L | -0.6wins | -0.56per pick | 56cpaid | -100%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xfd3e…5a7abacked Roberto Perez Socas | 46c | 22.81$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.41 | 911 | 63.9%582 W · 329 L | +66.0wins | +0.07per pick | 57cpaid | +12.9%equal weight | 58+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x061a…5a89backed Emile Hudd | 60c | 20$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$8 | 521 | 57%297 W · 224 L | +7.1wins | +0.01per pick | 56cpaid | +1.9%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.