Lol · resolved market
First Blood in Game 2?
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x7df1ab7c3aa34bb79c89fd8df9cfbe851aa9fef97b4edc74f5c1fb23a62bbe70
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- EDward Gamingof EDward Gaming, Bilibili Gaming
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Lolevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $3,081
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $4,237
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $3,081 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 14 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Lol is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Lol | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x93bc…8ca3backed EDward Gaming | 44c | 498.57$219 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$279.2 | 3,584 | 40.1%1,437 W · 2,147 L | +31.1wins | +0.01per pick | 39cpaid | -2.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x52f8…ad19backed Bilibili Gaming | 56c | 357.14$200 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$200 | 627 | 39.9%250 W · 377 L | -6.9wins | -0.01per pick | 41cpaid | +3.9%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x823b…59e9backed EDward Gaming | 67c | 297.53$200 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$97.53 | 124 | 50%62 W · 62 L | -1.7wins | -0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -13.6%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x55e3…b615backed Bilibili Gaming | 60c | 260.17$156 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$156 | 159 | 50.3%80 W · 79 L | -3.4wins | -0.02per pick | 52cpaid | -2.8%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x37b2…8681backed EDward Gaming | 40c | 235.88$94 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$141.53 | 961 | 49.9%480 W · 481 L | +4.0wins | 0.00per pick | 50cpaid | -5%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xcd43…0599backed EDward Gaming | 48c | 200$96 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$104 | 22 | 36.4%8 W · 14 L | -1.0wins | -0.05per pick | 41cpaid | -20.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x6861…cf22backed Bilibili Gaming | 50c | 200$100 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$100 | 65 | 69.2%45 W · 20 L | +3.2wins | +0.05per pick | 64cpaid | +3.4%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x3c2f…9765backed Bilibili Gaming | 56c | 120$67 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$67.2 | 46 | 41.3%19 W · 27 L | -6.0wins | -0.13per pick | 54cpaid | -27.4%equal weight | 41-0.08 edge/pick |
| 0x5807…74dcbacked Bilibili Gaming | 57c | 91.23$52 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$52 | 136 | 58.1%79 W · 57 L | -3.1wins | -0.02per pick | 60cpaid | -4.5%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xeef9…8731backed Bilibili Gaming | 52c | 82.8$43 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$42.78 | 347 | 56.5%196 W · 151 L | +12.2wins | +0.04per pick | 53cpaid | +7.1%equal weight | 54+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xa1ea…b845backed Bilibili Gaming | 57c | 69.17$39 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$39.43 | 6 | 66.7%4 W · 2 L | +0.3wins | +0.04per pick | 62cpaid | +6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xe907…cff6backed EDward Gaming | 50c | 49.04$24 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$24.63 | 2,508 | 39.8%999 W · 1,509 L | -76.4wins | -0.03per pick | 43cpaid | -18.9%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x4aef…22d9backed Bilibili Gaming | 52c | 31.25$16 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$16.25 | 345 | 68.7%237 W · 108 L | +24.1wins | +0.07per pick | 62cpaid | +12.8%equal weight | 57+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x82ca…3135backed Bilibili Gaming | 52c | 19.83$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.31 | 219 | 53%116 W · 103 L | +4.3wins | +0.02per pick | 51cpaid | -2.4%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Lol and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 13 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- First Blood in Game 2?this page
- First Blood in Game 1?EDward Gaming won
- Game Handicap: BLG (-1.5) vs EDward Gaming (+1.5)EDward Gaming won
- Games Total: O/U 2.5Over won
- LoL: EDward Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming (BO3) - LPL Group AscendBilibili Gaming won
- LoL: EDward Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 1 WinnerEDward Gaming won
- LoL: EDward Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 2 WinnerBilibili Gaming won
- Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 1?Over won
- Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 2?Over won
- Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 1?Over won
- Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 2?Over won
- Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 1?Under won
- Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 2?Over won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.