Tennis · resolved market
Vancouver: Mark Lajal vs Clement Chidekh
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x97a1474cae6fd076de363c20347d2cfb92a12f99867716282a64ec8ad00ee072
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Mark Lajalof Mark Lajal, Clement Chidekh
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $33,199
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $33,813
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $33,199 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 48 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xc6d2…d00fbacked Clement Chidekh | 32c | 7,081$2,231 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$2,231.21 | 117 | 41.9%49 W · 68 L | +5.5wins | +0.05per pick | 37cpaid | +11.2%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xfe78…0319backed Mark Lajal | 67c | 4,180$2,790 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$1,390.35 | 8,828 | 36.1%3,190 W · 5,638 L | -193.3wins | -0.02per pick | 38cpaid | -27.2%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x86b1…c094backed Clement Chidekh | 26c | 2,800$720 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$720 | 580 | 21.9%127 W · 453 L | +2.5wins | 0.00per pick | 21cpaid | -13.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Mark Lajal | 78c | 2,353$1,841 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$511.11 | 8,217 | 45.5%3,737 W · 4,480 L | +166.6wins | +0.02per pick | 43cpaid | -16.3%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2a69…d2f7backed Clement Chidekh | 27c | 1,855$500 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$500.19 | 1,435 | 24.3%348 W · 1,087 L | -36.2wins | -0.03per pick | 27cpaid | -22.2%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xf12f…b30fbacked Clement Chidekh | 45c | 1,290$580 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$580 | 700 | 41.1%288 W · 412 L | +5.4wins | +0.01per pick | 40cpaid | +1.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xc1d7…47a4backed Mark Lajal | 49c | 1,224$600 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$624.49 | 1,023 | 41.3%422 W · 601 L | -24.8wins | -0.02per pick | 44cpaid | -7.5%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x98db…dd17backed Clement Chidekh | 28c | 1,218$342 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$341.94 | 5,350 | 56.4%3,016 W · 2,334 L | +228.4wins | +0.04per pick | 52cpaid | -6.4%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x84ad…bfb7backed Mark Lajal | 66c | 1,052$694 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$357.83 | 4,533 | 67.7%3,071 W · 1,462 L | +306.6wins | +0.07per pick | 61cpaid | +5.2%equal weight | 57+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x0d2d…7ff5backed Mark Lajal | 71c | 1,051$748 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$302.31 | 8,505 | 42.6%3,619 W · 4,886 L | -166.3wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -21.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x5268…135dbacked Mark Lajal | 75c | 899.96$674 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$226.18 | 4,185 | 44.7%1,871 W · 2,314 L | +14.9wins | 0.00per pick | 44cpaid | -17.3%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xba86…9ab0backed Clement Chidekh | 38c | 677.61$257 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$257.49 | 672 | 39.1%263 W · 409 L | -29.5wins | -0.04per pick | 44cpaid | -12.6%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xae30…079ebacked Mark Lajal | 61c | 488$298 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$190.32 | 416 | 45.4%189 W · 227 L | -5.5wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | +3.8%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x9327…e1a5backed Mark Lajal | 53c | 471.7$250 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$221.7 | 30 | 43.3%13 W · 17 L | -0.2wins | -0.01per pick | 44cpaid | -5.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xeea3…a6a2backed Mark Lajal | 80c | 402.07$320 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$82.12 | 3,068 | 57.3%1,757 W · 1,311 L | +173.3wins | +0.06per pick | 52cpaid | -3.6%equal weight | 56+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x224f…514abacked Mark Lajal | 57c | 378.99$216 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$162.76 | 288 | 50.3%145 W · 143 L | -3.6wins | -0.01per pick | 52cpaid | +0.8%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x1cba…b694backed Mark Lajal | 67c | 366.87$246 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$120.52 | 1,429 | 44.2%631 W · 798 L | -23.1wins | -0.02per pick | 46cpaid | -24.2%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x6a80…d472backed Clement Chidekh | 45c | 334.29$150 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$150 | 1,186 | 52.4%622 W · 564 L | +28.9wins | +0.02per pick | 50cpaid | +5.2%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x9455…7defbacked Clement Chidekh | 15c | 333.33$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 960 | 49.5%475 W · 485 L | +16.3wins | +0.02per pick | 48cpaid | +3.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xcccc…05b2backed Mark Lajal | 78c | 318.47$248 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$70.06 | 113 | 72.6%82 W · 31 L | -5.9wins | -0.05per pick | 78cpaid | -6.8%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xa55c…1066backed Clement Chidekh | 22c | 246.23$54 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$54.17 | 443 | 49%217 W · 226 L | -0.9wins | 0.00per pick | 49cpaid | -2.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x3ca9…424abacked Mark Lajal | 68c | 245.4$167 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$77.91 | 1,710 | 53.7%918 W · 792 L | +30.7wins | +0.02per pick | 52cpaid | -8.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x78a1…5551backed Mark Lajal | 56c | 230.59$129 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$101.36 | 903 | 35.8%323 W · 580 L | -15.3wins | -0.02per pick | 37cpaid | -14.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x5b63…11a4backed Clement Chidekh | 18c | 227.61$41 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$40.97 | 4,934 | 41.5%2,048 W · 2,886 L | -77.0wins | -0.02per pick | 43cpaid | -15.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x715d…a4babacked Mark Lajal | 50c | 220$111 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$109 | 340 | 47.6%162 W · 178 L | +5.7wins | +0.02per pick | 46cpaid | +3.2%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xa032…2090backed Clement Chidekh | 16c | 200.81$32 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$32.16 | 1,624 | 49.8%809 W · 815 L | -9.7wins | -0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -4.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xfb8e…3dc3backed Clement Chidekh | 23c | 196.63$45 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$45 | 179 | 36.9%66 W · 113 L | +9.5wins | +0.05per pick | 32cpaid | +23.4%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x2a49…737abacked Mark Lajal | 55c | 181.82$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$81.82 | 205 | 63.4%130 W · 75 L | +1.2wins | +0.01per pick | 63cpaid | +1%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5b6e…f544backed Clement Chidekh | 18c | 138.88$25 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$25 | 323 | 29.7%96 W · 227 L | -12.8wins | -0.04per pick | 34cpaid | -28.6%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x03ac…c3d9backed Mark Lajal | 80c | 122.2$98 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$24.44 | 502 | 68.3%343 W · 159 L | +6.7wins | +0.01per pick | 67cpaid | +2.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xfcf0…ff0abacked Mark Lajal | 53c | 111.32$59 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$52.32 | 49 | 34.7%17 W · 32 L | +1.5wins | +0.03per pick | 32cpaid | -0.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x0d10…780bbacked Clement Chidekh | 15c | 100$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15 | 1,025 | 54%554 W · 471 L | +37.1wins | +0.04per pick | 50cpaid | +4.6%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xecae…c544backed Mark Lajal | 60c | 98.96$59 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$39.53 | 431 | 44.8%193 W · 238 L | -5.3wins | -0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -16.7%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5deb…ccddbacked Mark Lajal | 65c | 96.19$62 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$34.06 | 721 | 47.3%341 W · 380 L | -18.7wins | -0.03per pick | 50cpaid | -19.3%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x4126…e68bbacked Mark Lajal | 63c | 85.58$54 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$31.51 | 1,159 | 69%800 W · 359 L | +56.8wins | +0.05per pick | 64cpaid | +4%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x5061…4b02backed Clement Chidekh | 24c | 83.33$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 66 | 63.6%42 W · 24 L | +9.9wins | +0.15per pick | 49cpaid | +46.6%equal weight | 62+0.11 edge/pick |
| 0xebde…1de0backed Clement Chidekh | 49c | 80$39 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$39.2 | 891 | 34.3%306 W · 585 L | -40.1wins | -0.04per pick | 39cpaid | -22.4%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x26d6…caccbacked Mark Lajal | 79c | 71$56 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.25 | 1,487 | 47.5%706 W · 781 L | -19.1wins | -0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -21%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xa192…8876backed Mark Lajal | 58c | 69.66$40 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$29.26 | 185 | 43.8%81 W · 104 L | -7.6wins | -0.04per pick | 48cpaid | -8.9%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x200f…7a96backed Clement Chidekh | 42c | 64.66$27 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$27.16 | 7,139 | 49.7%3,548 W · 3,591 L | +109.9wins | +0.02per pick | 48cpaid | +3.3%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x999a…9a25backed Mark Lajal | 73c | 60.18$44 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$16.42 | 604 | 52.5%317 W · 287 L | +7.6wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -12%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x8935…7daabacked Clement Chidekh | 38c | 51.44$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.75 | 1,629 | 49%798 W · 831 L | -51.6wins | -0.03per pick | 52cpaid | -18.1%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x7edb…7993backed Mark Lajal | 72c | 45.15$32 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$12.7 | 1,459 | 50.1%731 W · 728 L | +0.4wins | 0.00per pick | 50cpaid | -16.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x0c99…0c88backed Clement Chidekh | 33c | 45.12$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.98 | 9,286 | 44.3%4,110 W · 5,176 L | -245.7wins | -0.03per pick | 47cpaid | -12.1%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xda24…7e54backed Mark Lajal | 64c | 43.8$28 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.68 | 41 | 53.7%22 W · 19 L | -0.4wins | -0.01per pick | 55cpaid | -0.9%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x22da…2866backed Mark Lajal | 71c | 43.15$31 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$12.45 | 950 | 50.1%476 W · 474 L | -10.1wins | -0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -12.1%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0a8d…7688backed Mark Lajal | 56c | 37.69$21 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$16.49 | 331 | 65%215 W · 116 L | +22.6wins | +0.07per pick | 58cpaid | +7.7%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x6aca…e738backed Mark Lajal | 74c | 27$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$7.11 | 118 | 61%72 W · 46 L | +10.7wins | +0.09per pick | 52cpaid | +12.6%equal weight | 58+0.07 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.