Asian League · resolved market
FC Seoul vs. Daejeon Hana Citizen FC: O/U 1.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xa9c90bc5b8068d911d2127f8a2ee00f4accba129370041bc66a02facd12ed917
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Underof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Asian Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $3,270
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $3,406
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $3,270 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 15 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Asian League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Asian League | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x6af9…a022backed Under | 27c | 1,500$405 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$1,095 | 22 | 45.5%10 W · 12 L | +0.4wins | +0.02per pick | 44cpaid | +7.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Over | 73c | 723.5$529 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$528.54 | 5,946 | 46.1%2,743 W · 3,203 L | +50.5wins | +0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -6.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xb354…0b3bbacked Over | 31c | 299.99$94 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$94 | 5 | 20%1 W · 4 L | -0.7wins | -0.14per pick | 34cpaid | -50%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xbfd7…f0bfbacked Under | 68c | 182.97$125 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$57.98 | 693 | 52.2%362 W · 331 L | +1.3wins | 0.00per pick | 52cpaid | -1.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x77bc…b91bbacked Under | 24c | 163.18$40 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$123.25 | 1,356 | 45.5%617 W · 739 L | +15.0wins | +0.01per pick | 44cpaid | -13.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x8a81…a86bbacked Over | 68c | 147.82$100 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$100 | 213 | 67.6%144 W · 69 L | 0.0wins | 0.00per pick | 68cpaid | 0%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xfe78…0319backed Over | 70c | 132.86$93 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$92.96 | 828 | 42.4%351 W · 477 L | +19.4wins | +0.02per pick | 40cpaid | -2.2%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x7e52…00f5backed Over | 65c | 120$78 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$78 | 24 | 33.3%8 W · 16 L | -1.1wins | -0.05per pick | 38cpaid | -28.6%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x133a…504abacked Under | 18c | 111.11$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$91.11 | 83 | 41%34 W · 49 L | -1.5wins | -0.02per pick | 43cpaid | +0.4%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x3cad…92f0backed Under | 18c | 83.33$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$68.33 | 104 | 41.3%43 W · 61 L | -3.4wins | -0.03per pick | 45cpaid | -2.3%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x4f1f…f5eabacked Over | 40c | 50$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 64 | 31.3%20 W · 44 L | -4.1wins | -0.06per pick | 38cpaid | -22.7%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x5929…4684backed Under | 31c | 44.04$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$30.39 | 363 | 52.9%192 W · 171 L | -1.3wins | 0.00per pick | 53cpaid | -2.5%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x997a…4cbebacked Over | 66c | 22.79$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15.04 | 30 | 56.7%17 W · 13 L | -2.9wins | -0.10per pick | 66cpaid | -17%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x4676…b720backed Over | 62c | 21.03$13 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.12 | 39 | 64.1%25 W · 14 L | +1.9wins | +0.05per pick | 59cpaid | +11.1%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x46d2…6805backed Over | 75c | 14$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.5 | 80 | 68.8%55 W · 25 L | +8.0wins | +0.10per pick | 59cpaid | +17.5%equal weight | 58+0.08 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Asian League and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 6 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- FC Seoul vs. Daejeon Hana Citizen FC: O/U 1.5this page
- FC Seoul vs. Daejeon Hana Citizen FC: Both Teams to ScoreNo won
- FC Seoul vs. Daejeon Hana Citizen FC: O/U 2.5Under won
- FC Seoul vs. Daejeon Hana Citizen FC: O/U 3.5Under won
- Spread: Daejeon Hana Citizen FC (-1.5)FC Seoul won
- Spread: FC Seoul (-1.5)Daejeon Hana Citizen FC won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.