La Liga · resolved market
UD Almería vs. CD Eldense: Both Teams to Score
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xee1afaad362269e8b04f71e9d39ab23fa41869aaa497cb94f764f66df4778f0f
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Noof Yes, No
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- La Ligaevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $1,368
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $1,398
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $1,368 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 15 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in La Liga is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in La Liga | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xc291…5d74backed No | 51c | 329.92$169 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$160.83 | 1,497 | 38.6%578 W · 919 L | +12.4wins | +0.01per pick | 38cpaid | +1.1%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x6d3c…d294backed No | 49c | 212$104 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$108.36 | 1,169 | 51.8%606 W · 563 L | +18.1wins | +0.02per pick | 50cpaid | +3.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x1bf4…d0b2backed Yes | 49c | 183.67$90 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$90 | 7 | 28.6%2 W · 5 L | -0.4wins | -0.06per pick | 34cpaid | -26.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x99f0…9495backed No | 51c | 168.67$86 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$82.65 | 174 | 47.1%82 W · 92 L | +10.8wins | +0.06per pick | 41cpaid | +11.1%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x1ba2…d212backed Yes | 52c | 156.2$81 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$81.22 | 112 | 42.9%48 W · 64 L | +0.8wins | +0.01per pick | 42cpaid | -2.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x70f9…f25bbacked Yes | 53c | 143.34$76 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$75.6 | 3 | 33.3%1 W · 2 L | -0.5wins | -0.16per pick | 50cpaid | -29.1%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2a69…d2f7backed No | 52c | 113$59 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$54.24 | 988 | 33.4%330 W · 658 L | -7.5wins | -0.01per pick | 34cpaid | -21%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xdb83…1e50backed Yes | 48c | 105.64$51 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50.62 | 680 | 50.4%343 W · 337 L | +15.2wins | +0.02per pick | 48cpaid | +2.9%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xfd74…bedabacked Yes | 19c | 100$19 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19 | 100 | 22%22 W · 78 L | -1.1wins | -0.01per pick | 23cpaid | -4.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xdc41…dd7ebacked Yes | 49c | 91$45 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$44.59 | 120 | 50%60 W · 60 L | +7.1wins | +0.06per pick | 44cpaid | +9.7%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x3e6b…8a98backed No | 53c | 45.45$24 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$21.36 | 212 | 54.2%115 W · 97 L | +2.6wins | +0.01per pick | 53cpaid | +1%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x076d…8d4cbacked Yes | 47c | 41.19$19 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.36 | 109 | 43.1%47 W · 62 L | 0.0wins | 0.00per pick | 43cpaid | -8.6%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed No | 67c | 37.56$25 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$12.47 | 4,729 | 47.1%2,225 W · 2,504 L | -24.0wins | -0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -10.8%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x200f…7a96backed No | 48c | 37$18 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$19.24 | 1,559 | 51.6%804 W · 755 L | -9.3wins | -0.01per pick | 52cpaid | -0.7%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked No | 76c | 34.5$26 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$8.36 | 3,444 | 43%1,482 W · 1,962 L | +31.8wins | +0.01per pick | 42cpaid | -10.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in La Liga and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 13 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- UD Almería vs. CD Eldense: Both Teams to Scorethis page
- Spread: UD Almería (-1.5)UD Almería won
- Spread: UD Almería (-2.5)UD Almería won
- UD Almería vs. CD Eldense: 1st Half O/U 1.5Over won
- UD Almería vs. CD Eldense: CD Eldense 1st Half O/U 0.5Under won
- UD Almería vs. CD Eldense: CD Eldense O/U 2.5Under won
- UD Almería vs. CD Eldense: O/U 1.5Over won
- UD Almería vs. CD Eldense: O/U 2.5Over won
- UD Almería vs. CD Eldense: O/U 3.5Under won
- UD Almería vs. CD Eldense: O/U 4.5Under won
- UD Almería vs. CD Eldense: O/U 5.5Under won
- UD Almería vs. CD Eldense: UD Almería O/U 1.5Over won
- UD Almería vs. CD Eldense: UD Almería O/U 2.5Over won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.