MLB · resolved market
Spread: Texas Rangers (-1.5)
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xeec8daa1a4386c3586f41da179368f6e08959df91a547434c806b4f987d4b8ae
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Chicago White Soxof Texas Rangers, Chicago White Sox
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- MLBevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $1,449
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $1,434
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $1,449 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 21 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in MLB is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in MLB | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xdbca…ca8dbacked Texas Rangers | 42c | 238.1$100 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$100 | 432 | 47%203 W · 229 L | -19.2wins | -0.04per pick | 51cpaid | -8.9%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x9b11…5375backed Chicago White Sox | 58c | 197.14$114 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$82.79 | 1,777 | 49.5%880 W · 897 L | +25.6wins | +0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -0.1%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0d2d…7ff5backed Chicago White Sox | 66c | 152.84$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$52.67 | 8,295 | 47.8%3,966 W · 4,329 L | +72.4wins | +0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -4.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5268…135dbacked Texas Rangers | 41c | 109.59$45 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$44.93 | 11,357 | 52.9%6,003 W · 5,354 L | +209.9wins | +0.02per pick | 51cpaid | -0.2%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x9703…69c2backed Chicago White Sox | 58c | 83.33$48 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$35 | 3,453 | 51.2%1,767 W · 1,686 L | +58.1wins | +0.02per pick | 49cpaid | +3.4%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x7fea…8f74backed Chicago White Sox | 36c | 76$27 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$48.64 | 880 | 46.4%408 W · 472 L | -22.6wins | -0.03per pick | 49cpaid | -19.6%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x256b…97bbbacked Texas Rangers | 42c | 71.43$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30 | 391 | 49.1%192 W · 199 L | -2.5wins | -0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -1%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0811…1870backed Texas Rangers | 43c | 69.77$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30 | 11 | 54.5%6 W · 5 L | +1.0wins | +0.09per pick | 46cpaid | +16.2%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x6d3c…d294backed Texas Rangers | 41c | 49.27$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20.2 | 5,401 | 50.5%2,726 W · 2,675 L | +17.6wins | 0.00per pick | 50cpaid | +0.8%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xa032…2090backed Chicago White Sox | 58c | 44.89$26 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$18.85 | 952 | 52.9%504 W · 448 L | +17.8wins | +0.02per pick | 51cpaid | +3.4%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xfe78…0319backed Texas Rangers | 66c | 33.15$22 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$21.88 | 10,846 | 51.6%5,594 W · 5,252 L | +137.6wins | +0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -0.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x2c99…d91abacked Texas Rangers | 42c | 33$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.86 | 122 | 35.2%43 W · 79 L | -10.5wins | -0.09per pick | 44cpaid | -19.8%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0xd9e0…05f2backed Chicago White Sox | 49c | 31.23$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.93 | 4,169 | 50.2%2,093 W · 2,076 L | +92.5wins | +0.02per pick | 48cpaid | -11.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x48b9…abe2backed Texas Rangers | 42c | 30$13 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$12.6 | 348 | 43.4%151 W · 197 L | +10.3wins | +0.03per pick | 40cpaid | +8.5%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xad6f…cc7cbacked Texas Rangers | 44c | 29.42$13 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13 | 80 | 51.3%41 W · 39 L | -3.9wins | -0.05per pick | 56cpaid | -17.4%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x032e…2a9ebacked Chicago White Sox | 58c | 28$16 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11.76 | 2,291 | 52.5%1,202 W · 1,089 L | +24.6wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | +3.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xb6fc…b24ebacked Texas Rangers | 56c | 26$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.56 | 473 | 45.7%216 W · 257 L | +2.1wins | 0.00per pick | 45cpaid | +1.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x8ece…1949backed Chicago White Sox | 59c | 25.59$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.59 | 19 | 52.6%10 W · 9 L | -0.1wins | 0.00per pick | 53cpaid | -4.6%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xb0f4…6fa9backed Texas Rangers | 64c | 24$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15.36 | 1,777 | 58.4%1,037 W · 740 L | +91.8wins | +0.05per pick | 53cpaid | +3.5%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xa3c2…df3dbacked Chicago White Sox | 58c | 18$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$7.56 | 2,800 | 49.3%1,381 W · 1,419 L | +0.6wins | 0.00per pick | 49cpaid | +0.3%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x8935…7daabacked Chicago White Sox | 62c | 16.4$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6.15 | 873 | 70.1%612 W · 261 L | +91.6wins | +0.10per pick | 60cpaid | +14.5%equal weight | 61+0.10 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in MLB and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 10 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Spread: Texas Rangers (-1.5)this page
- Chicago White Sox vs. Texas RangersChicago White Sox won
- Chicago White Sox vs. Texas Rangers: 1st 5 Innings O/U 4.5Over won
- Chicago White Sox vs. Texas Rangers: O/U 10.5Over won
- Chicago White Sox vs. Texas Rangers: O/U 7.5Over won
- Chicago White Sox vs. Texas Rangers: O/U 8.5Over won
- Chicago White Sox vs. Texas Rangers: O/U 9.5Over won
- Spread: Chicago White Sox (-2.5)Chicago White Sox won
- Spread: Chicago White Sox (-3.5)Chicago White Sox won
- Will there be a run scored in the first inning?: Chicago White Sox vs. Texas RangersYes won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.