Premier League · resolved market
Spread: Nottingham Forest (-1.5)
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x077419f9f4ba5545641f5c87dc996a705d05888d433230c9d1a1accc76b407c7
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Wolvesof Nottingham Forest, Wolves
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Premier Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $12,524
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $12,113
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $12,524 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 19 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Premier League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Premier League | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xd6a3…9489backed Nottingham Forest | 17c | 3,329$568 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$568.34 | 1,004 | 46.3%465 W · 539 L | +25.8wins | +0.03per pick | 44cpaid | -2.3%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x13fa…3facbacked Nottingham Forest | 18c | 1,500$270 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$270 | 607 | 28%170 W · 437 L | +2.7wins | 0.00per pick | 28cpaid | -2.4%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xa266…67f7backed Nottingham Forest | 20c | 500.3$100 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$100 | 198 | 26.3%52 W · 146 L | -14.0wins | -0.07per pick | 33cpaid | -22.5%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x508e…648bbacked Nottingham Forest | 20c | 500$100 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$100 | 16 | 37.5%6 W · 10 L | +0.2wins | +0.01per pick | 36cpaid | -23.3%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xd0ee…fb4fbacked Nottingham Forest | 22c | 459.73$100 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$100 | 35 | 42.9%15 W · 20 L | +0.3wins | +0.01per pick | 42cpaid | -3.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5159…d7aebacked Wolves | 78c | 378.73$295 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$83.32 | 53 | 45.3%24 W · 29 L | -0.6wins | -0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -4.6%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xe60a…6a47backed Nottingham Forest | 20c | 307$62 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$61.54 | 1,212 | 41.7%505 W · 707 L | -1.6wins | 0.00per pick | 42cpaid | -1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x27d1…37d4backed Nottingham Forest | 22c | 207.24$45 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$44.64 | 2 | 50%1 W · 1 L | +0.4wins | +0.18per pick | 32cpaid | +19%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5137…1556backed Nottingham Forest | 23c | 187.6$43 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$42.53 | 370 | 36.2%134 W · 236 L | -18.1wins | -0.05per pick | 41cpaid | -14.5%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xe6e4…22ccbacked Nottingham Forest | 18c | 150$27 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$27 | 186 | 46.8%87 W · 99 L | +11.2wins | +0.06per pick | 41cpaid | +12.6%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x682f…3265backed Nottingham Forest | 20c | 100$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 289 | 50.9%147 W · 142 L | -2.6wins | -0.01per pick | 52cpaid | -2.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x9731…9b35backed Wolves | 80c | 87.48$70 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$17.57 | 1,006 | 46.6%469 W · 537 L | -20.5wins | -0.02per pick | 49cpaid | -5.7%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xbb58…86a4backed Wolves | 72c | 82$59 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$22.96 | 78 | 44.9%35 W · 43 L | -2.5wins | -0.03per pick | 48cpaid | -11.5%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xf102…1348backed Nottingham Forest | 20c | 72$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.4 | 541 | 28.3%153 W · 388 L | -7.4wins | -0.01per pick | 30cpaid | -10.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xdebb…eedbbacked Wolves | 76c | 67.45$52 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.86 | 171 | 53.8%92 W · 79 L | +10.0wins | +0.06per pick | 48cpaid | +16.6%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x426a…128bbacked Nottingham Forest | 20c | 60.32$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11.93 | 139 | 41%57 W · 82 L | -0.3wins | 0.00per pick | 41cpaid | -11.7%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x15a6…bf5dbacked Nottingham Forest | 27c | 58$16 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15.66 | 40 | 40%16 W · 24 L | -0.8wins | -0.02per pick | 42cpaid | +31.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xd40d…8287backed Nottingham Forest | 20c | 50$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10 | 8 | 25%2 W · 6 L | -1.1wins | -0.13per pick | 38cpaid | -35.3%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x6ac5…4b6ebacked Wolves | 79c | 46.25$36 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$9.86 | 517 | 50.1%259 W · 258 L | +19.4wins | +0.04per pick | 46cpaid | +10.5%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Premier League and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 5 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Spread: Nottingham Forest (-1.5)this page
- Wolves vs. Nottingham Forest: Both Teams to ScoreNo won
- Wolves vs. Nottingham Forest: O/U 1.5Under won
- Wolves vs. Nottingham Forest: O/U 2.5Under won
- Wolves vs. Nottingham Forest: O/U 3.5Under won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.