TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

MLB · resolved market

Spread: Los Angeles Dodgers (-4.5)

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
Los Angeles Dodgersof Los Angeles Dodgers, Chicago White Sox
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
MLBevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$24,815
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$24,841

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $24,815 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 19 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in MLB is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in MLB
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0xde49…fe85backed Los Angeles Dodgers56c15,000$8,438 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$6,562.2849051%250 W · 240 L-10.8wins-0.02per pick53cpaid-4.8%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0xfe78…0319backed Chicago White Sox44c6,039$2,658 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$2,657.6310,97951.6%5,660 W · 5,319 L+139.8wins+0.01per pick50cpaid-0.3%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x224a…a3d5backed Chicago White Sox45c5,118$2,293 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$2,292.884,36847.4%2,070 W · 2,298 L-79.9wins-0.02per pick49cpaid-6.2%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x7634…600dbacked Chicago White Sox44c4,000$1,760 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1,76060350.1%302 W · 301 L-10.0wins-0.02per pick52cpaid-5.7%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0xda48…5926backed Los Angeles Dodgers55c4,000$2,200 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$1,80012339%48 W · 75 L-9.7wins-0.08per pick47cpaid-26.6%equal weight43-0.07 edge/pick
0x5268…135dbacked Chicago White Sox44c3,814$1,665 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1,664.8411,51952.9%6,092 W · 5,427 L+213.9wins+0.02per pick51cpaid-0.1%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xe401…7b88backed Chicago White Sox70c249.99$175 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1759,81946.4%4,557 W · 5,262 L+39.8wins0.00per pick46cpaid-8.2%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x2728…4f96backed Los Angeles Dodgers45c222.22$100 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$122.2253448.9%261 W · 273 L-1.2wins0.00per pick49cpaid-2.4%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x320b…6057backed Los Angeles Dodgers26c154.04$40 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$114.043847.4%18 W · 20 L+3.9wins+0.10per pick37cpaid+36.6%equal weight57+0.06 edge/pick
0x2f4e…1fb8backed Chicago White Sox74c149.04$110 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$110.293,79245.8%1,738 W · 2,054 L-5.5wins0.00per pick46cpaid-6.4%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xdaee…8559backed Chicago White Sox44c113.57$50 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$49.9215848.7%77 W · 81 L0.0wins0.00per pick49cpaid-1.2%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xbca0…9705backed Los Angeles Dodgers53c99.64$53 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$46.628,59452.6%4,521 W · 4,073 L+508.9wins+0.06per pick47cpaid+5.1%equal weight57+0.06 edge/pick
0xca2b…3489backed Los Angeles Dodgers53c58$31 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$27.2629242.5%124 W · 168 L-1.7wins-0.01per pick43cpaid0%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x6b23…04a3backed Chicago White Sox33c51.78$17 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$17.273,46051.2%1,773 W · 1,687 L+107.5wins+0.03per pick48cpaid+1.5%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0x5821…7c51backed Chicago White Sox74c50$37 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$372,99550.8%1,521 W · 1,474 L-36.0wins-0.01per pick52cpaid-4.7%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x6cb1…1002backed Chicago White Sox49c49.1$24 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$24.0621350.2%107 W · 106 L+2.2wins+0.01per pick49cpaid-1%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0xf898…e720backed Los Angeles Dodgers56c47$27 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$20.56,30548.2%3,042 W · 3,263 L+181.6wins+0.03per pick45cpaid+0.8%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0x0520…3efdbacked Los Angeles Dodgers51c42$21 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$20.5853261.8%329 W · 203 L+20.6wins+0.04per pick58cpaid+4.4%equal weight54+0.04 edge/pick
0xd1ed…d7cbbacked Los Angeles Dodgers58c37$22 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$15.414,40544.9%1,978 W · 2,427 L+80.0wins+0.02per pick43cpaid-6.5%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in MLB and say nothing about this market.

The rest of this event

Polymarket sells these questions together. 13 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.