Mls · resolved market
Vancouver Whitecaps FC vs. San Jose Earthquakes: O/U 4.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x2ab6f797d9062dc10b78fe069c84ad591630286b9e7481158df785eef4b33523
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Underof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Mlsevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- Polymarket published no figure
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $4,434
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $4,434 — TailMyPicks’s own total, because the venue published none.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 14 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Mls is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Mls | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Under | 77c | 1,716$1,314 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$401.8 | 3,012 | 43.5%1,311 W · 1,701 L | -29.7wins | -0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -9.8%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x3b8d…6d3bbacked Over | 23c | 1,080$248 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$248.4 | 3 | 0%0 W · 3 L | -1.1wins | -0.35per pick | 35cpaid | -100%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x4f42…8bbcbacked Over | 25c | 1,001$252 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$252 | 190 | 44.7%85 W · 105 L | +9.4wins | +0.05per pick | 40cpaid | +14.6%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x2605…2b17backed Under | 77c | 259.24$200 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$59.24 | 4 | 75%3 W · 1 L | +0.7wins | +0.17per pick | 58cpaid | +48.4%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xd37a…2358backed Over | 24c | 199.97$48 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$47.99 | 803 | 58%466 W · 337 L | +5.9wins | +0.01per pick | 57cpaid | -0.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x6835…1976backed Under | 75c | 180$135 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$45 | 243 | 51.4%125 W · 118 L | -16.4wins | -0.07per pick | 58cpaid | -12.2%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x6ac5…4b6ebacked Under | 74c | 125$93 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$32.5 | 251 | 49%123 W · 128 L | +0.1wins | 0.00per pick | 49cpaid | +2.3%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x1a29…16c5backed Over | 25c | 99.27$25 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$25 | 84 | 65.5%55 W · 29 L | +16.4wins | +0.20per pick | 46cpaid | +60.6%equal weight | 67+0.15 edge/pick |
| 0xd0e7…b14fbacked Over | 25c | 94$24 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$23.5 | 49 | 32.7%16 W · 33 L | -3.6wins | -0.07per pick | 40cpaid | -8.4%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x200f…7a96backed Under | 75c | 63.57$47 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$16.13 | 1,301 | 51.2%666 W · 635 L | -19.6wins | -0.02per pick | 53cpaid | -3.6%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xc4c3…6031backed Under | 77c | 45.65$35 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.51 | 6 | 66.7%4 W · 2 L | 0.0wins | 0.00per pick | 67cpaid | -5.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xbefe…2d45backed Over | 31c | 32.19$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10 | 28 | 53.6%15 W · 13 L | -1.6wins | -0.06per pick | 59cpaid | -14%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x6814…a9e7backed Under | 75c | 30.17$23 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$7.62 | 580 | 43.6%253 W · 327 L | -12.2wins | -0.02per pick | 46cpaid | -11.1%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x50e0…776ebacked Under | 77c | 15$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$3.45 | 16 | 43.8%7 W · 9 L | -0.2wins | -0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -16.9%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Mls and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 9 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Vancouver Whitecaps FC vs. San Jose Earthquakes: O/U 4.5this page
- Spread: San Jose Earthquakes (-1.5)Vancouver Whitecaps FC won
- Spread: San Jose Earthquakes (-2.5)Vancouver Whitecaps FC won
- Spread: Vancouver Whitecaps FC (-1.5)San Jose Earthquakes won
- Spread: Vancouver Whitecaps FC (-2.5)San Jose Earthquakes won
- Vancouver Whitecaps FC vs. San Jose Earthquakes: Both Teams to ScoreNo won
- Vancouver Whitecaps FC vs. San Jose Earthquakes: O/U 1.5Under won
- Vancouver Whitecaps FC vs. San Jose Earthquakes: O/U 2.5Under won
- Vancouver Whitecaps FC vs. San Jose Earthquakes: O/U 3.5Under won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.