South American Leagues · resolved market
Spread: CS Cienciano (-1.5)
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x39242f670e5728e36dd8d3f5b5479d3c0e22c717aa65432cb1c64db1aa5ea87e
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- CS Ciencianoof CS Cienciano, Academia Puerto Cabello
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- South American Leaguesevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $1,811
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $2,189
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $1,811 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 13 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in South American Leagues is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in South American Leagues | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Academia Puerto Cabello | 50c | 443.97$222 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$222.29 | 8,107 | 48.7%3,948 W · 4,159 L | +26.8wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | -8.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x4956…e2c7backed CS Cienciano | 38c | 387.05$147 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$239.97 | 79 | 50.6%40 W · 39 L | -1.7wins | -0.02per pick | 53cpaid | -4.9%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x7a30…e0c1backed CS Cienciano | 50c | 291.19$145 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$145.69 | 20 | 45%9 W · 11 L | -1.8wins | -0.09per pick | 54cpaid | -16.2%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xa334…beaebacked CS Cienciano | 53c | 276.75$146 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$130.88 | 38 | 28.9%11 W · 27 L | -5.2wins | -0.14per pick | 43cpaid | -45.4%equal weight | 41-0.08 edge/pick |
| 0xd01c…7f9dbacked Academia Puerto Cabello | 62c | 201$125 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$124.62 | 1,355 | 49.7%674 W · 681 L | -8.1wins | -0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -1%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x7d0c…a3b7backed Academia Puerto Cabello | 62c | 201$125 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$124.62 | 2,335 | 51.5%1,202 W · 1,133 L | +2.6wins | 0.00per pick | 51cpaid | +0.4%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x01c7…e995backed Academia Puerto Cabello | 47c | 200.48$94 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$94.19 | 1,362 | 44.9%611 W · 751 L | -22.0wins | -0.02per pick | 46cpaid | -19.2%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x0335…caf1backed CS Cienciano | 49c | 98.92$48 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$50.45 | 6 | 16.7%1 W · 5 L | -1.7wins | -0.29per pick | 46cpaid | -66%equal weight | 44-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0xd1d2…2be9backed CS Cienciano | 48c | 60.55$29 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$31.49 | 52 | 26.9%14 W · 38 L | -4.1wins | -0.08per pick | 35cpaid | -43.5%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x0daa…c9dabacked Academia Puerto Cabello | 53c | 47.55$25 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$25.05 | 2 | 0%0 W · 2 L | -1.1wins | -0.53per pick | 53cpaid | -100%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xc291…5d74backed Academia Puerto Cabello | 49c | 44.87$22 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$21.92 | 3,749 | 38.2%1,431 W · 2,318 L | -33.3wins | -0.01per pick | 39cpaid | -8.2%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x403a…3173backed CS Cienciano | 47c | 41.2$19 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$21.84 | 2 | 100%2 W · 0 L | +0.8wins | +0.41per pick | 59cpaid | +76.8%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x57c8…3d9bbacked CS Cienciano | 54c | 40$22 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$18.4 | 65 | 29.2%19 W · 46 L | -8.7wins | -0.13per pick | 43cpaid | -45.7%equal weight | 39-0.10 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in South American Leagues and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 8 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Spread: CS Cienciano (-1.5)this page
- CS Cienciano vs. Academia Puerto Cabello: Both Teams to ScoreNo won
- CS Cienciano vs. Academia Puerto Cabello: O/U 1.5Over won
- CS Cienciano vs. Academia Puerto Cabello: O/U 2.5Under won
- CS Cienciano vs. Academia Puerto Cabello: O/U 3.5Under won
- CS Cienciano vs. Academia Puerto Cabello: O/U 4.5Under won
- Spread: Academia Puerto Cabello (-1.5)CS Cienciano won
- Spread: CS Cienciano (-2.5)Academia Puerto Cabello won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.