CS2 · resolved market
Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x4873568a536dfdb6b3397cbd588f5430eaefdcb9eceb9b085c0e5549e13b199b
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Underof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- CS2every record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $1,395
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $1,654
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $1,395 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 15 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in CS2 is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in CS2 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xd0fb…8092backed Over | 50c | 250$125 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$125 | 132 | 45.5%60 W · 72 L | -8.9wins | -0.07per pick | 52cpaid | +0.4%equal weight | 44-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x299f…2c50backed Over | 20c | 201.41$41 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$40.59 | 721 | 39.7%286 W · 435 L | -25.9wins | -0.04per pick | 43cpaid | -19.6%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x1776…1403backed Under | 80c | 188.24$151 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$37.65 | 10 | 40%4 W · 6 L | +0.5wins | +0.05per pick | 35cpaid | +30%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x95e9…67b6backed Under | 50c | 110$55 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$55 | 194 | 49%95 W · 99 L | -6.1wins | -0.03per pick | 52cpaid | -5.2%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xd207…c366backed Under | 50c | 107.62$54 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$53.81 | 19 | 47.4%9 W · 10 L | -1.3wins | -0.07per pick | 54cpaid | -16.1%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x71a5…b594backed Over | 50c | 95$48 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$47.5 | 179 | 46.4%83 W · 96 L | -2.1wins | -0.01per pick | 48cpaid | +2.1%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xde41…58bdbacked Over | 49c | 95$47 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$46.55 | 31 | 38.7%12 W · 19 L | -3.5wins | -0.11per pick | 50cpaid | -16.8%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0xe907…cff6backed Over | 51c | 93.35$48 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$47.61 | 2,326 | 45.1%1,049 W · 1,277 L | -62.2wins | -0.03per pick | 48cpaid | -16.6%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x3881…804ebacked Under | 49c | 91.2$45 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$46.51 | 1,496 | 51.5%771 W · 725 L | -7.2wins | 0.00per pick | 52cpaid | -0.5%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0x3763…345fbacked Under | 50c | 85$43 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$42.5 | 535 | 45%241 W · 294 L | -11.6wins | -0.02per pick | 47cpaid | -2.7%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x8f12…1135backed Over | 51c | 71.59$37 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$36.51 | 4 | 50%2 W · 2 L | -0.2wins | -0.04per pick | 54cpaid | -12.1%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x28fc…6171backed Over | 51c | 58.82$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30 | 72 | 47.2%34 W · 38 L | -5.5wins | -0.08per pick | 55cpaid | -15.1%equal weight | 44-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x4337…8882backed Under | 49c | 37.57$18 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$19.16 | 882 | 42.3%373 W · 509 L | -13.0wins | -0.01per pick | 44cpaid | -1.5%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x30f5…3cabbacked Under | 50c | 32.72$16 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$16.36 | 9 | 66.7%6 W · 3 L | +1.4wins | +0.15per pick | 51cpaid | +32.4%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xcb6b…604ebacked Over | 50c | 30$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15 | 821 | 46.3%380 W · 441 L | -8.4wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -4.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in CS2 and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 7 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5this page
- Counter-Strike: Gentle Mates vs paiN (BO3) - BLAST Bounty QualifierpaiN won
- Counter-Strike: Gentle Mates vs paiN - Map 1 WinnerpaiN won
- Counter-Strike: Gentle Mates vs paiN - Map 2 WinnerpaiN won
- Games Total: O/U 2.5Under won
- Map 2 Rounds Handicap: paiN (-3.5) vs Gentle Mates (+3.5)paiN won
- Map Handicap: paiN (-1.5) vs Gentle Mates (+1.5)paiN won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.