Tennis · resolved market
Set Handicap: Lehecka (-1.5) vs Bergs (+1.5)
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x56b9371817c6c08141298f0582f9da8e87676c18679a2342a317316931e3178d
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Leheckaof Lehecka, Bergs
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $2,106
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $2,986
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $2,106 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 14 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x0a26…1851backed Bergs | 55c | 847.22$466 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$465.97 | 607 | 53.7%326 W · 281 L | -10.0wins | -0.02per pick | 55cpaid | -8.7%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xdc16…40a5backed Lehecka | 45c | 822.22$370 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$452.22 | 1,132 | 42.8%485 W · 647 L | -7.6wins | -0.01per pick | 44cpaid | -2.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x4255…6dd5backed Bergs | 57c | 58$33 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$32.92 | 7 | 14.3%1 W · 6 L | -2.8wins | -0.39per pick | 54cpaid | -76.6%equal weight | 40-0.09 edge/pick |
| 0xbd83…c0c2backed Lehecka | 43c | 58$25 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$32.92 | 6 | 66.7%4 W · 2 L | +0.9wins | +0.16per pick | 51cpaid | +36.8%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xe649…4e37backed Bergs | 57c | 35.35$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20.15 | 1,414 | 41.1%581 W · 833 L | -21.3wins | -0.02per pick | 43cpaid | -2.9%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xcdd4…7696backed Lehecka | 43c | 35.35$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$20.15 | 439 | 49%215 W · 224 L | +2.3wins | +0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -1.9%equal weight | 510.00 edge/pick |
| 0x9c76…c926backed Lehecka | 42c | 34.48$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$20 | 4,090 | 39.8%1,628 W · 2,462 L | +95.9wins | +0.02per pick | 37cpaid | +7.3%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xf303…7ee6backed Bergs | 58c | 34.48$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 130 | 66.9%87 W · 43 L | +10.5wins | +0.08per pick | 59cpaid | +12.9%equal weight | 58+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0xa4d2…b34bbacked Bergs | 58c | 31$18 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$18.03 | 7 | 28.6%2 W · 5 L | -2.0wins | -0.28per pick | 57cpaid | -54.9%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x874d…c888backed Bergs | 48c | 30$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.46 | 8 | 25%2 W · 6 L | -2.5wins | -0.31per pick | 56cpaid | -62.4%equal weight | 42-0.08 edge/pick |
| 0x625f…89a4backed Bergs | 54c | 27$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.58 | 7 | 14.3%1 W · 6 L | -2.4wins | -0.34per pick | 48cpaid | -53.9%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x75b1…9b98backed Lehecka | 42c | 26$11 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$14.98 | 8 | 62.5%5 W · 3 L | +1.5wins | +0.18per pick | 44cpaid | +37.8%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xbf71…9f1cbacked Lehecka | 45c | 25$11 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$13.75 | 9 | 44.4%4 W · 5 L | -1.0wins | -0.12per pick | 56cpaid | -21%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x507e…beaebacked Lehecka | 62c | 20.64$13 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$7.88 | 7,018 | 43.2%3,031 W · 3,987 L | +124.9wins | +0.02per pick | 41cpaid | -9.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 2 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Set Handicap: Lehecka (-1.5) vs Bergs (+1.5)this page
- Qatar Open: Jiri Lehecka vs Zizou BergsLehecka won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.