Asian League · resolved market
Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: Both Teams to Score
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x57ad5ed8971075f7b04461226737be69b195091358e14ad2aa835b57de74a12f
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Yesof Yes, No
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Asian Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $3,909
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $5,063
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $3,909 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 21 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Asian League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Asian League | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x21f5…c161backed Yes | 56c | 714.29$400 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$314.29 | 88 | 34.1%30 W · 58 L | +0.3wins | 0.00per pick | 34cpaid | +10.8%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xd6a8…58fdbacked No | 43c | 594.29$255 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$255.35 | 95 | 30.5%29 W · 66 L | -1.4wins | -0.01per pick | 32cpaid | -13.2%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed No | 42c | 246.48$104 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$103.64 | 5,963 | 46%2,744 W · 3,219 L | +46.2wins | +0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0a16…9d73backed No | 46c | 233.37$107 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$107.35 | 64 | 39.1%25 W · 39 L | -8.3wins | -0.13per pick | 52cpaid | -25%equal weight | 40-0.09 edge/pick |
| 0xf00e…00f4backed Yes | 59c | 164.71$97 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$67.53 | 17 | 41.2%7 W · 10 L | -1.9wins | -0.11per pick | 53cpaid | -30%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xe867…0905backed Yes | 62c | 161.13$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$61.13 | 100 | 41%41 W · 59 L | -4.9wins | -0.05per pick | 46cpaid | +1.5%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x7ea5…de7bbacked No | 39c | 132.44$52 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$51.94 | 1,766 | 50.2%887 W · 879 L | +31.4wins | +0.02per pick | 48cpaid | +6.4%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x5bda…17a8backed Yes | 61c | 130$79 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$50.7 | 175 | 45.7%80 W · 95 L | -1.0wins | -0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -9.9%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0xe20b…3ae4backed Yes | 62c | 104.4$65 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$39.4 | 31 | 71%22 W · 9 L | +2.1wins | +0.07per pick | 64cpaid | +13.9%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x7d0c…a3b7backed Yes | 62c | 103.22$64 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$39.36 | 1,651 | 50.9%840 W · 811 L | +5.8wins | 0.00per pick | 51cpaid | -2.3%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x88ed…8300backed No | 39c | 89.53$35 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$35 | 19 | 47.4%9 W · 10 L | -0.1wins | -0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -3.3%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xc718…64a8backed Yes | 59c | 49.85$29 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$20.44 | 304 | 64.8%197 W · 107 L | +6.1wins | +0.02per pick | 63cpaid | -0.4%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x0ed3…50fdbacked Yes | 57c | 45.58$26 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$19.6 | 4 | 75%3 W · 1 L | +0.5wins | +0.12per pick | 63cpaid | +14.2%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x6318…46b1backed No | 37c | 45.17$17 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$16.71 | 86 | 30.2%26 W · 60 L | -2.7wins | -0.03per pick | 33cpaid | -6.1%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xe569…e759backed Yes | 62c | 40.32$25 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.32 | 34 | 50%17 W · 17 L | +0.2wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xdb83…1e50backed No | 38c | 35.01$13 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.3 | 1,235 | 49.9%616 W · 619 L | +9.1wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | +0.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xc291…5d74backed No | 39c | 30.77$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11.86 | 2,456 | 37.9%931 W · 1,525 L | +0.1wins | 0.00per pick | 38cpaid | -1.7%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x2c46…dac9backed Yes | 61c | 30.57$19 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11.97 | 770 | 56.2%433 W · 337 L | +40.8wins | +0.05per pick | 51cpaid | +10.7%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x43d7…1c75backed Yes | 59c | 29.99$18 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$12.3 | 102 | 45.1%46 W · 56 L | +0.3wins | 0.00per pick | 45cpaid | -2.4%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xe5b1…30b2backed Yes | 60c | 29.48$18 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11.79 | 83 | 47%39 W · 44 L | -1.2wins | -0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -9.2%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x6733…45febacked Yes | 62c | 22.58$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$8.58 | 1 | 100%1 W · 0 L | +0.4wins | +0.38per pick | 62cpaid | +61.3%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Asian League and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 8 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: Both Teams to Scorethis page
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: O/U 1.5Over won
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: O/U 2.5Over won
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: O/U 3.5Over won
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: O/U 4.5Under won
- Spread: Shanghai Shenhua FC (-1.5)Wuhan San Zhen FC won
- Spread: Shanghai Shenhua FC (-2.5)Wuhan San Zhen FC won
- Spread: Wuhan San Zhen FC (-1.5)Shanghai Shenhua FC won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.