TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

MLB · resolved market

Spread: San Francisco Giants (-1.5)

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
Chicago Cubsof San Francisco Giants, Chicago Cubs
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
MLBevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$11,282
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$11,279

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $11,282 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 20 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in MLB is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in MLB
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0x2005…75eabacked Chicago Cubs67c2,838$1,902 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$936.628,08646.1%3,728 W · 4,358 L+29.9wins0.00per pick46cpaid-7.1%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x5268…135dbacked San Francisco Giants33c2,663$877 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$877.1511,35752.9%6,003 W · 5,354 L+209.9wins+0.02per pick51cpaid-0.2%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x204f…5e14backed San Francisco Giants36c899.12$323 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$323.3112,24746.4%5,687 W · 6,560 L-68.6wins-0.01per pick47cpaid-9.5%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x5b62…d87fbacked Chicago Cubs64c380.07$243 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$136.831,83650.8%932 W · 904 L-3.9wins0.00per pick51cpaid-0.2%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xd1ed…d7cbbacked Chicago Cubs67c360.88$242 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$119.094,38144.9%1,966 W · 2,415 L+77.8wins+0.02per pick43cpaid-6.4%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x2f55…8956backed Chicago Cubs68c338.15$230 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$108.2114858.8%87 W · 61 L+3.5wins+0.02per pick56cpaid+5.4%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xa623…a4febacked San Francisco Giants36c201$72 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$72.361,11945.5%509 W · 610 L+16.9wins+0.02per pick44cpaid+5.6%equal weight52+0.01 edge/pick
0x9791…05c0backed San Francisco Giants40c159.28$64 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$63.7130%0 W · 3 L-1.0wins-0.32per pick32cpaid-100%equal weight46-0.03 edge/pick
0x1cdd…e595backed Chicago Cubs71c94.39$67 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$27.441,92717.2%331 W · 1,596 L-320.3wins-0.17per pick34cpaid-64.3%equal weight32-0.16 edge/pick
0xa697…59d5backed Chicago Cubs64c88.23$56 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$31.766,89950.4%3,478 W · 3,421 L-7.1wins0.00per pick51cpaid-0.1%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x8d0c…c90abacked Chicago Cubs66c83.48$55 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$28.762,37649.7%1,182 W · 1,194 L+17.1wins+0.01per pick49cpaid+1.4%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x1719…ec68backed San Francisco Giants36c70$25 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$25.272154.2%391 W · 330 L+20.8wins+0.03per pick51cpaid+144.7%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0x8c97…5c66backed Chicago Cubs65c46.15$30 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$16.155040%20 W · 30 L-5.8wins-0.12per pick52cpaid-23.5%equal weight41-0.08 edge/pick
0xc718…64a8backed San Francisco Giants36c45.94$17 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$16.541,08356.3%610 W · 473 L+13.7wins+0.01per pick55cpaid+0.4%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x5407…5bbdbacked San Francisco Giants35c40$14 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1477836%280 W · 498 L-17.2wins-0.02per pick38cpaid-5.5%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x48b9…abe2backed San Francisco Giants36c40$14 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$14.434843.4%151 W · 197 L+10.3wins+0.03per pick40cpaid+8.5%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0x4aab…38ccbacked San Francisco Giants36c28.47$10 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$10.2565359.6%389 W · 264 L+3.4wins+0.01per pick59cpaid+1.4%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x5968…3fc4backed Chicago Cubs67c28.24$19 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$9.3228943.3%125 W · 164 L-11.6wins-0.04per pick47cpaid-11.1%equal weight46-0.04 edge/pick
0x8a4a…3026backed San Francisco Giants46c27.43$13 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$12.625552.7%29 W · 26 L+0.5wins+0.01per pick52cpaid0%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0xf766…9251backed Chicago Cubs65c15.4$10 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$5.391,46463.5%929 W · 535 L-10.1wins-0.01per pick64cpaid-1.1%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in MLB and say nothing about this market.

The rest of this event

Polymarket sells these questions together. 14 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.