Tennis · resolved market
Lehecka vs. Fils: Total Sets O/U 2.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x8d0c377991eea080c8b31c9d12f45cf87778f3b0fc73b9fcd00205f6f957f8c4
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Under 2.5of Over 2.5, Under 2.5
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $2,040
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $2,155
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $2,040 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 17 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x5e30…acbfbacked Under 2.5 | 59c | 513.37$303 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$210.48 | 7,724 | 47.8%3,691 W · 4,033 L | +41.2wins | +0.01per pick | 47cpaid | +1.2%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0599…3c6abacked Over 2.5 | 41c | 486.79$200 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$200 | 583 | 59.2%345 W · 238 L | -8.3wins | -0.01per pick | 61cpaid | -4.7%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x507e…beaebacked Under 2.5 | 54c | 431.65$234 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$198.1 | 7,018 | 43.2%3,031 W · 3,987 L | +124.9wins | +0.02per pick | 41cpaid | -9.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xab4c…2a53backed Over 2.5 | 56c | 196.74$110 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$110 | 37 | 37.8%14 W · 23 L | -3.6wins | -0.10per pick | 48cpaid | -22.5%equal weight | 44-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x1947…02b4backed Over 2.5 | 55c | 181.59$100 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$100 | 25 | 52%13 W · 12 L | -0.6wins | -0.02per pick | 54cpaid | -15.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x8330…b3b1backed Under 2.5 | 54c | 180$97 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$82.8 | 372 | 33.9%126 W · 246 L | -6.9wins | -0.02per pick | 36cpaid | -5.4%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2ea3…b910backed Over 2.5 | 28c | 105.42$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30 | 46 | 58.7%27 W · 19 L | +0.2wins | 0.00per pick | 58cpaid | +1.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x4537…fd02backed Over 2.5 | 49c | 101.4$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 389 | 51.9%202 W · 187 L | -16.1wins | -0.04per pick | 56cpaid | -9.5%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x7a73…a9c8backed Over 2.5 | 42c | 94.17$40 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$40 | 625 | 34.4%215 W · 410 L | -20.1wins | -0.03per pick | 38cpaid | -18.4%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xd9fe…e4bebacked Over 2.5 | 41c | 85.37$35 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$35 | 85 | 57.6%49 W · 36 L | +10.2wins | +0.12per pick | 46cpaid | +25.5%equal weight | 60+0.09 edge/pick |
| 0x4255…6dd5backed Under 2.5 | 61c | 54$33 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$21.06 | 7 | 14.3%1 W · 6 L | -2.8wins | -0.39per pick | 54cpaid | -76.6%equal weight | 40-0.09 edge/pick |
| 0xbd83…c0c2backed Over 2.5 | 39c | 54$21 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$21.06 | 6 | 66.7%4 W · 2 L | +0.9wins | +0.16per pick | 51cpaid | +36.8%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x75b1…9b98backed Over 2.5 | 39c | 52$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20.1 | 8 | 62.5%5 W · 3 L | +1.5wins | +0.18per pick | 44cpaid | +37.8%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xa4d2…b34bbacked Under 2.5 | 61c | 52$32 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$20.1 | 7 | 28.6%2 W · 5 L | -2.0wins | -0.28per pick | 57cpaid | -54.9%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0xc376…a8e7backed Under 2.5 | 56c | 35.71$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.71 | 128 | 52.3%67 W · 61 L | +0.9wins | +0.01per pick | 52cpaid | -1.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xc208…e74fbacked Over 2.5 | 46c | 25$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11.5 | 23 | 39.1%9 W · 14 L | +0.6wins | +0.02per pick | 37cpaid | +3.1%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x200f…7a96backed Under 2.5 | 59c | 20.57$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$8.47 | 7,139 | 49.7%3,548 W · 3,591 L | +109.9wins | +0.02per pick | 48cpaid | +3.3%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 5 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Lehecka vs. Fils: Total Sets O/U 2.5this page
- Lehecka vs. Fils: Match O/U 22.5Under won
- Qatar Open: Jiri Lehecka vs Arthur FilsFils won
- Set 1 Winner: Lehecka vs FilsFils won
- Set Handicap: Lehecka (-1.5) vs Fils (+1.5)Fils won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.