CS2 · resolved market
Counter-Strike: ex-RUSTEC vs Rune Eaters - Map 2 Winner
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xa63baa6eaab9de136796c91071d1564a5407555983b121349ec1490c29dc390a
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- ex-RUSTECof ex-RUSTEC, Rune Eaters
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- CS2every record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $25,835
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $26,040
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $25,835 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 44 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in CS2 is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in CS2 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xfe78…0319backed ex-RUSTEC | 59c | 5,879$3,497 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$2,382.91 | 1,407 | 38.9%547 W · 860 L | -41.9wins | -0.03per pick | 42cpaid | -29.1%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x0e1b…ecafbacked Rune Eaters | 46c | 2,496$1,159 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$1,158.94 | 2,328 | 51.1%1,189 W · 1,139 L | +92.3wins | +0.04per pick | 47cpaid | +1.4%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x60ec…f7b0backed ex-RUSTEC | 48c | 1,415$680 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$734.3 | 1,033 | 53.2%550 W · 483 L | +64.9wins | +0.06per pick | 47cpaid | +5.8%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x37c1…8de1backed Rune Eaters | 46c | 1,290$600 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$600 | 1,319 | 44.2%583 W · 736 L | +45.8wins | +0.03per pick | 41cpaid | +8.6%equal weight | 54+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x0c99…0c88backed Rune Eaters | 43c | 992.8$430 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$429.63 | 2,434 | 44.6%1,085 W · 1,349 L | -64.0wins | -0.03per pick | 47cpaid | -13.9%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x8935…7daabacked ex-RUSTEC | 50c | 916.4$457 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$459.86 | 2,622 | 47.6%1,249 W · 1,373 L | -33.8wins | -0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -10.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xa55c…1066backed Rune Eaters | 51c | 849.5$436 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$435.58 | 366 | 49.5%181 W · 185 L | +11.0wins | +0.03per pick | 46cpaid | +2.5%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x2529…548abacked ex-RUSTEC | 56c | 763$430 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$332.82 | 3,225 | 51.2%1,651 W · 1,574 L | +88.0wins | +0.03per pick | 48cpaid | -6.2%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x84ad…bfb7backed ex-RUSTEC | 61c | 692.34$424 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$268.17 | 1,088 | 54.2%590 W · 498 L | +39.3wins | +0.04per pick | 51cpaid | -8.2%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x3881…804ebacked ex-RUSTEC | 48c | 600$288 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$312 | 1,496 | 51.5%771 W · 725 L | -7.2wins | 0.00per pick | 52cpaid | -0.5%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0x2e3c…08babacked Rune Eaters | 44c | 416.01$185 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$184.77 | 4,691 | 43.6%2,043 W · 2,648 L | -83.2wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -21.8%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xb373…d97cbacked Rune Eaters | 35c | 260.49$90 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$90 | 587 | 45.5%267 W · 320 L | -15.9wins | -0.03per pick | 48cpaid | -11.3%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xfe8a…23cebacked Rune Eaters | 52c | 250$130 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$130.28 | 2,214 | 47.5%1,052 W · 1,162 L | -5.6wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | -14.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x499f…b72bbacked Rune Eaters | 50c | 208.76$104 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$104.38 | 145 | 44.8%65 W · 80 L | +6.9wins | +0.05per pick | 40cpaid | +14.2%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xc4fe…601fbacked Rune Eaters | 32c | 181.22$57 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$57.22 | 3,459 | 29.3%1,012 W · 2,447 L | -279.9wins | -0.08per pick | 37cpaid | -43.5%equal weight | 41-0.08 edge/pick |
| 0xddb6…b9b3backed ex-RUSTEC | 60c | 146.85$88 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$58.94 | 2,508 | 41%1,029 W · 1,479 L | -115.5wins | -0.05per pick | 46cpaid | -22.9%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x5e6c…0c16backed ex-RUSTEC | 70c | 128.36$90 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$38.36 | 190 | 35.8%68 W · 122 L | -3.7wins | -0.02per pick | 38cpaid | -18.5%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x904e…0becbacked Rune Eaters | 39c | 119.3$46 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$46.44 | 4,933 | 37.4%1,844 W · 3,089 L | -249.2wins | -0.05per pick | 42cpaid | -32.2%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x2f26…0d8fbacked Rune Eaters | 39c | 109$43 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$42.52 | 380 | 32.1%122 W · 258 L | -18.7wins | -0.05per pick | 37cpaid | -35.3%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x72aa…90e0backed ex-RUSTEC | 58c | 104$60 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$43.65 | 4,228 | 49.2%2,080 W · 2,148 L | +59.9wins | +0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -10.7%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x94d2…cfbdbacked ex-RUSTEC | 50c | 86.23$43 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$42.77 | 2,110 | 47.2%995 W · 1,115 L | -62.2wins | -0.03per pick | 50cpaid | -18.4%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xb4d2…ce99backed Rune Eaters | 43c | 75$32 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$32.25 | 2,626 | 30.9%812 W · 1,814 L | -105.4wins | -0.04per pick | 35cpaid | -29.8%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xc33d…0d40backed Rune Eaters | 32c | 75$24 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$23.75 | 131 | 42.7%56 W · 75 L | -2.1wins | -0.02per pick | 44cpaid | -21%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x775d…6bebbacked ex-RUSTEC | 65c | 75$48 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$26.6 | 2,136 | 42.9%916 W · 1,220 L | -68.1wins | -0.03per pick | 46cpaid | -20%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x3cad…92f0backed ex-RUSTEC | 54c | 74.07$40 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$34.07 | 309 | 39.2%121 W · 188 L | -4.6wins | -0.01per pick | 41cpaid | -5.7%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xebff…70e5backed Rune Eaters | 17c | 64$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11 | 2,774 | 24.5%681 W · 2,093 L | -295.8wins | -0.11per pick | 35cpaid | -50.7%equal weight | 38-0.11 edge/pick |
| 0x6b73…02c0backed Rune Eaters | 47c | 63.83$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30 | 40 | 72.5%29 W · 11 L | +5.2wins | +0.13per pick | 60cpaid | +26.8%equal weight | 59+0.08 edge/pick |
| 0xb91c…ed66backed Rune Eaters | 26c | 61.01$16 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$16.16 | 700 | 42.3%296 W · 404 L | -16.6wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -7.6%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x4713…4d21backed Rune Eaters | 22c | 59$13 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.1 | 5,287 | 31.3%1,657 W · 3,630 L | -383.3wins | -0.07per pick | 39cpaid | -37.1%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x629d…756cbacked ex-RUSTEC | 63c | 57$36 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$21.25 | 2,349 | 42.5%998 W · 1,351 L | -72.7wins | -0.03per pick | 46cpaid | -20.2%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xf1f2…8c8dbacked ex-RUSTEC | 63c | 49.99$31 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$18.68 | 723 | 53.5%387 W · 336 L | +28.5wins | +0.04per pick | 50cpaid | -4%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xbfd7…f0bfbacked ex-RUSTEC | 75c | 48.72$37 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$12.18 | 5,511 | 47%2,590 W · 2,921 L | +42.0wins | +0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -4.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xbb8e…08c1backed ex-RUSTEC | 74c | 43$32 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.99 | 2,362 | 46.6%1,100 W · 1,262 L | -53.1wins | -0.02per pick | 49cpaid | -14.6%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xa9f5…937fbacked Rune Eaters | 33c | 41$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.53 | 3,910 | 36.6%1,431 W · 2,479 L | -197.6wins | -0.05per pick | 42cpaid | -29.1%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x0ba9…a8d8backed ex-RUSTEC | 72c | 41$30 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11.49 | 406 | 66.3%269 W · 137 L | +10.7wins | +0.03per pick | 64cpaid | +3.2%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xf1ee…519cbacked Rune Eaters | 35c | 40$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.97 | 3,202 | 45.6%1,459 W · 1,743 L | -79.3wins | -0.02per pick | 48cpaid | -16%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x77de…e67abacked Rune Eaters | 43c | 35.19$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15 | 526 | 45.1%237 W · 289 L | -20.2wins | -0.04per pick | 49cpaid | -12.4%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xe8e0…7eecbacked ex-RUSTEC | 58c | 31$18 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$13.02 | 1,848 | 41.7%770 W · 1,078 L | -69.2wins | -0.04per pick | 45cpaid | -21.8%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xf9d7…a1ffbacked ex-RUSTEC | 47c | 29$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.48 | 277 | 46.2%128 W · 149 L | -12.4wins | -0.04per pick | 51cpaid | -11.3%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x8037…04fabacked Rune Eaters | 52c | 26.77$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.92 | 80 | 48.8%39 W · 41 L | -9.2wins | -0.12per pick | 60cpaid | -24.5%equal weight | 40-0.09 edge/pick |
| 0xf184…d472backed Rune Eaters | 47c | 26.4$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$12.41 | 35 | 68.6%24 W · 11 L | +4.2wins | +0.12per pick | 56cpaid | +28.7%equal weight | 58+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x80d8…b703backed ex-RUSTEC | 63c | 26.27$17 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$9.63 | 1,676 | 51.1%857 W · 819 L | +21.2wins | +0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -2.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xb6d2…d67bbacked ex-RUSTEC | 61c | 23.9$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$9.32 | 1,315 | 51.1%672 W · 643 L | -99.5wins | -0.08per pick | 59cpaid | -18.5%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0xb188…8be3backed Rune Eaters | 70c | 16$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11.2 | 245 | 58%142 W · 103 L | -3.1wins | -0.01per pick | 59cpaid | -7%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in CS2 and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 3 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Counter-Strike: ex-RUSTEC vs Rune Eaters - Map 2 Winnerthis page
- Counter-Strike: ex-RUSTEC vs Rune Eaters (BO3) - CCT Europe Series #5 Group Stageex-RUSTEC won
- Counter-Strike: ex-RUSTEC vs Rune Eaters - Map 1 WinnerRune Eaters won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.