Us Politics · resolved market
Three Trump Cabinet confirmations in January?
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xc14b62b33f01bfbca073994c18d78e935d6d088b99c141901894b18c05e7fc02
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Noof Yes, No
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Us Politicsevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $49,539
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $38,864
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $49,539 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 12 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Us Politics is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Us Politics | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x2032…d577backed Yes | 12c | 1,657$199 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$198.84 | 151 | 55%83 W · 68 L | +3.2wins | +0.02per pick | 53cpaid | +3.2%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xa45a…76b0backed Yes | 12c | 1,657$199 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$198.78 | 6 | 0%0 W · 6 L | -1.0wins | -0.17per pick | 17cpaid | -100%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x542a…a81bbacked Yes | 2c | 993.64$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 100 | 7%7 W · 93 L | -2.0wins | -0.02per pick | 9cpaid | -67.9%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xa244…8e63backed Yes | 11c | 652.31$70 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$70 | 25 | 28%7 W · 18 L | -0.9wins | -0.04per pick | 32cpaid | -56.9%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x6d31…9862backed Yes | 7c | 506.94$38 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$37.59 | 39 | 41%16 W · 23 L | +3.2wins | +0.08per pick | 33cpaid | +38%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xe8e4…b676backed Yes | 13c | 500$65 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$64.95 | 97 | 46.4%45 W · 52 L | +9.5wins | +0.10per pick | 37cpaid | +63.4%equal weight | 59+0.08 edge/pick |
| 0x2459…8d76backed Yes | 11c | 287.04$33 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$32.52 | 125 | 31.2%39 W · 86 L | -6.6wins | -0.05per pick | 36cpaid | -37.7%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x8fb5…a862backed Yes | 12c | 286$34 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$33.66 | 13 | 7.7%1 W · 12 L | -0.8wins | -0.06per pick | 13cpaid | -3.6%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x1cfc…2111backed Yes | 10c | 238.96$24 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$23.9 | 996 | 29.5%294 W · 702 L | -73.3wins | -0.07per pick | 37cpaid | -37.8%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0xe77e…bb3dbacked Yes | 14c | 200$28 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$28 | 34 | 23.5%8 W · 26 L | -1.5wins | -0.05per pick | 28cpaid | -16.1%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x58fe…d0e2backed Yes | 22c | 66.83$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15 | 12 | 33.3%4 W · 8 L | -1.2wins | -0.10per pick | 43cpaid | -43.9%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xbc54…680fbacked No | 77c | 44.81$34 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.38 | 70 | 45.7%32 W · 38 L | +7.5wins | +0.11per pick | 35cpaid | +66.2%equal weight | 59+0.08 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Us Politics and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 11 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Three Trump Cabinet confirmations in January? this page
- Eight Trump Cabinet confirmations in January? Yes won
- Five Trump Cabinet confirmations in January? No won
- Four Trump Cabinet confirmations in January? No won
- Nine Trump Cabinet confirmations in January? No won
- No Trump Cabinet confirmations in January? No won
- One Trump Cabinet confirmation in January? No won
- Seven Trump Cabinet confirmations in January? No won
- Six Trump Cabinet confirmations in January? No won
- Ten or more Trump Cabinet confirmations in January? No won
- Two Trump Cabinet confirmations in January? No won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.