La Liga · resolved market
UD Las Palmas vs. Albacete Balompié: O/U 3.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xc8ef9435d627244a7923ce5a2071fd15da6235bb10aa8182c8795d3e1b4cadf4
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Underof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- La Ligaevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $9,428
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $9,134
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $9,428 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 16 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in La Liga is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in La Liga | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xd273…17eabacked Over | 2c | 2,750$55 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$55 | 8 | 50%4 W · 4 L | +0.5wins | +0.06per pick | 44cpaid | -22.3%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xfe78…0319backed Over | 15c | 2,156$320 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$320.42 | 834 | 44.6%372 W · 462 L | +14.9wins | +0.02per pick | 43cpaid | +7.1%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2c36…4da4backed Over | 3c | 666.64$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 8 | 12.5%1 W · 7 L | -1.1wins | -0.14per pick | 26cpaid | -77.1%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Over | 12c | 588.64$69 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$68.57 | 3,449 | 43%1,484 W · 1,965 L | +32.1wins | +0.01per pick | 42cpaid | -10.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x77bc…b91bbacked Over | 7c | 271.75$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.56 | 1,655 | 43.8%725 W · 930 L | -22.5wins | -0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -15.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xc291…5d74backed Over | 11c | 200.6$23 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$22.77 | 1,508 | 38.7%583 W · 925 L | +12.4wins | +0.01per pick | 38cpaid | +0.9%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x7bf4…6600backed Under | 80c | 200$160 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$40 | 1 | 100%1 W · 0 L | +0.2wins | +0.20per pick | 80cpaid | +25%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x52d9…fb1abacked Over | 20c | 199.1$40 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$39.82 | 417 | 51.8%216 W · 201 L | +18.2wins | +0.04per pick | 47cpaid | -0.3%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x56f4…9ec5backed Under | 56c | 132.22$74 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$58 | 29 | 55.2%16 W · 13 L | +1.3wins | +0.04per pick | 51cpaid | -7.2%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x9075…cfe8backed Over | 12c | 119.99$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.4 | 340 | 50%170 W · 170 L | +16.6wins | +0.05per pick | 45cpaid | +6.4%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xa8f1…fee6backed Over | 35c | 100$35 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$34.56 | 18 | 55.6%10 W · 8 L | +1.9wins | +0.11per pick | 45cpaid | +10.6%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x54a2…1d43backed Under | 57c | 80$46 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$34.4 | 33 | 27.3%9 W · 24 L | +4.2wins | +0.13per pick | 15cpaid | +158.8%equal weight | 58+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0xe911…3d4ebacked Over | 45c | 66$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$29.7 | 839 | 39.8%334 W · 505 L | -21.0wins | -0.02per pick | 42cpaid | -15.4%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xb8ee…9e81backed Over | 42c | 50$21 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$21 | 24 | 45.8%11 W · 13 L | -0.4wins | -0.02per pick | 47cpaid | -9.7%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xa3d1…de26backed Under | 78c | 38.46$30 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$8.46 | 16 | 62.5%10 W · 6 L | +2.2wins | +0.14per pick | 49cpaid | +13.8%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x6d3c…d294backed Under | 73c | 18.52$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$5 | 1,176 | 51.9%610 W · 566 L | +18.8wins | +0.02per pick | 50cpaid | +3.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in La Liga and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 9 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- UD Las Palmas vs. Albacete Balompié: O/U 3.5this page
- Spread: UD Las Palmas (-1.5)Albacete Balompié won
- Spread: UD Las Palmas (-2.5)Albacete Balompié won
- UD Las Palmas vs. Albacete Balompié: Both Teams to ScoreYes won
- UD Las Palmas vs. Albacete Balompié: O/U 1.5Over won
- UD Las Palmas vs. Albacete Balompié: O/U 2.5Over won
- UD Las Palmas vs. Albacete Balompié: O/U 4.5Under won
- UD Las Palmas vs. Albacete Balompié: O/U 5.5Under won
- UD Las Palmas vs. Albacete Balompié: UD Las Palmas O/U 1.5Over won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.