TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

Wallet 0xa13d…f67a

Rebuilt .

Summary

Qualified picks
18
Categories scored
2
Categories below 50
1

Best Category: Asian League, grading 52 out of 100 (+0.02 per pick).

Best Category Asian League at 52 out of 100; worst Tennis at 47.

What is a Tail Score?

A mark out of 100, per Category. 50 means no edge at all — this wallet did about what the prices it paid implied it would. Above 50 it beat those prices; below 50 it did worse than them.

The scale does not move. 100 is a wallet beating the prices it paid by 0.45 per pick and 0 is losing to them by the same, on every wallet, on every page, in every month. So a grade you screenshot today still means what it meant when you took it, and two wallets can be put side by side.

Nobody reaches either end. Across every wallet TailMyPicks has scored, the marks run from roughly 5 to 87 — which is what a fixed ruler costs, and what buys the sentence above.

It is not a win rate. A wallet can win four Picks in five and still grade below 50, if the market was already pricing those outcomes at 90c — it paid for the wins rather than finding them. The vs expected and Avg entry columns below are what separate the two.

The mark is deliberately pulled toward 50 when there is little evidence. Three lucky Picks do not produce a high grade; several hundred consistent ones do. So a modest grade on thousands of Picks means something a high grade on twelve does not.

Because it is shrunk this way, a Category grade is a conservative reading. The headline figure for a wallet is its best Category, so it always understates how badly the wallet does in its worst one — which is why the table below is per Category and not one blended number.

Record by Category

Ordered by how much this wallet actually traded in each Category, not by score — so the Categories it plays most appear first whether they went well or badly. Open any row to see the picks its numbers were computed from — all of them.

CategoryQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
Tennis Inactivelast resolved Jun 30, 2026, EDT1662.5%10 W · 6 L-1.2wins-0.08per pick70cpaid-8.9%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
Tennis — the 16 picks behind this row

Every qualified pick this wallet made in Tennis, newest first — these are the picks the row above was computed from, not a sample of them. P/L held is what each pick would have been worth held to resolution, not cash this wallet withdrew. Days are shown in US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in. A market name opens TailMyPicks’s own post-mortem of that market — who else was on it, and what they paid — and a result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody.

MarketEntrySizeResultResolvedReturnP/L held
Quito: Juan Sebastian Osorio vs Peter Bertranbacked Peter Bertran · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)79c$1,082Lost — open this pick on its own pageJun 30, 2026, EDT-100%-$1,082.35
Milan: Niels McDonald vs Juan Martinbacked Juan Martin · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)77c$650Won — open this pick on its own pageJun 30, 2026, EDT+29.4%+$191.29
Wimbledon ATP: Andrey Rublev vs Roman Safiullinbacked Andrey Rublev · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)72c$399Lost — open this pick on its own pageJun 29, 2026, EDT-100%-$398.57
Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Jerome Kym vs Gonzalo Buenobacked Gonzalo Bueno · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)77c$184Lost — open this pick on its own pageJun 22, 2026, EDT-100%-$184.46
Lexus Eastbourne Open, Qualification: Matteo Arnaldi vs Toby Samuelbacked Matteo Arnaldi · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)76c$328Won — open this pick on its own pageJun 21, 2026, EDT+30.9%+$101.34
Nottingham 2: Jacob Fearnley vs Benjamin Bonzibacked Benjamin Bonzi · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)79c$120Won — open this pick on its own pageJun 17, 2026, EDT+26.6%+$31.96
HSBC Championships: Jack Pinnington Jones vs Denis Shapovalovbacked Denis Shapovalov · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)73c$100Won — open this pick on its own pageJun 15, 2026, EDT+37.1%+$37.12
Ilkley: Emerson Jones vs Dalma Galfibacked Emerson Jones · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)46c$90Lost — open this pick on its own pageJun 10, 2026, EDT-100%-$89.64
Tucuman: Johan Alexander Rodriguez vs Juan Manuel La Sernabacked Juan Manuel La Serna · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)76c$104Lost — open this pick on its own pageJun 10, 2026, EDT-100%-$103.54
Libema Open: Katie Volynets vs Zeynep Sonmezbacked Zeynep Sonmez · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)70c$65Won — open this pick on its own pageJun 9, 2026, EDT+42.9%+$27.86
Istanbul: Linda Fruhvirtova vs Laura Pigossibacked Laura Pigossi · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)67c$113Won — open this pick on its own pageMay 7, 2026, EDT+49.3%+$55.72
Internazionali BNL d'Italia: Dalma Galfi vs Anastasia Potapovabacked Anastasia Potapova · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)73c$229Won — open this pick on its own pageMay 6, 2026, EDT+36.4%+$83.56
Internazionali BNL d'Italia: Aleksandar Vukic vs Patrick Kypsonbacked Aleksandar Vukic · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)78c$34Won — open this pick on its own pageMay 6, 2026, EDT+28%+$9.63
Internazionali BNL d'Italia: Lilli Tagger vs Maria Sakkaribacked Maria Sakkari · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)47c$222Won — open this pick on its own pageMay 6, 2026, EDT+113%+$250.61
Internazionali BNL d'Italia: Marco Trungelliti vs Zachary Svajdabacked Marco Trungelliti · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)71c$387Lost — open this pick on its own pageMay 6, 2026, EDT-100%-$386.99
Internazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Lilli Tagger vs Alina Korneevabacked Alina Korneeva · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)61c$215Won — open this pick on its own pageMay 5, 2026, EDT+63.9%+$137.57
All 16 picks, newest first.
Asian League Inactivelast resolved May 3, 2026, EDT2100%2 W · 0 L+0.5wins+0.25per pick75cpaid+33.3%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
Asian League — the 2 picks behind this row

Every qualified pick this wallet made in Asian League, newest first — these are the picks the row above was computed from, not a sample of them. P/L held is what each pick would have been worth held to resolution, not cash this wallet withdrew. Days are shown in US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in. A market name opens TailMyPicks’s own post-mortem of that market — who else was on it, and what they paid — and a result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody.

vs expected is how many more (or fewer) Picks this wallet won than the prices it paid implied it would. It is the column that tells a real edge apart from a record bought by backing favourites. Realizable edge is what that comes to per Pick for somebody copying the wallet, after the cost of getting in behind it. Avg entry is the average price it paid, so a strong record built on heavy favourites shows as one. ROI per pick counts every Pick equally rather than by size, which is how a record earned across many Picks is told apart from one carried by a few large ones. Days are shown in US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in — an American night game settles after midnight UTC, so any other zone would name the day after the one it was played on. Inactive means nothing has resolved in that Category recently. The score is kept and the wallet stays reachable here; it only leaves the default leaderboard.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.