Tennis · resolved market
Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs. Martin Landaluce: Total Sets O/U 3.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x0512fbbf88f2af1bf29e07c928c73af1e70eb98a260ac01087ffcedbd37ba7bc
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Over 3.5of Over 3.5, Under 3.5
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $2,748
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $3,367
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $2,748 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 20 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x5e30…acbfbacked Under 3.5 | 34c | 1,062$357 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$357.14 | 7,724 | 47.8%3,691 W · 4,033 L | +41.2wins | +0.01per pick | 47cpaid | +1.2%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x9453…6952backed Over 3.5 | 67c | 447.76$300 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$147.76 | 30 | 60%18 W · 12 L | +0.7wins | +0.02per pick | 58cpaid | 0%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x9c76…c926backed Under 3.5 | 33c | 224.15$74 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$73.97 | 4,076 | 39.7%1,620 W · 2,456 L | +93.7wins | +0.02per pick | 37cpaid | +7.2%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x56ae…9badbacked Over 3.5 | 66c | 151.52$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$51.52 | 486 | 37.7%183 W · 303 L | -12.0wins | -0.02per pick | 40cpaid | -9.2%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xca39…4ed7backed Over 3.5 | 66c | 151.52$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$51.52 | 140 | 60.7%85 W · 55 L | -2.5wins | -0.02per pick | 62cpaid | -2.8%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x9069…9c14backed Over 3.5 | 67c | 149.28$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$49.28 | 184 | 54.3%100 W · 84 L | +3.8wins | +0.02per pick | 52cpaid | +13.2%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x6134…c8ccbacked Over 3.5 | 66c | 147.88$98 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$50.28 | 349 | 57.6%201 W · 148 L | +6.0wins | +0.02per pick | 56cpaid | +1.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x87d6…551abacked Over 3.5 | 65c | 99.65$65 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$34.65 | 83 | 56.6%47 W · 36 L | +3.1wins | +0.04per pick | 53cpaid | +4.3%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x0806…4adabacked Over 3.5 | 66c | 75.76$50 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$25.76 | 146 | 52.7%77 W · 69 L | -1.0wins | -0.01per pick | 53cpaid | -2.8%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x2fa0…aa66backed Over 3.5 | 66c | 75.76$50 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$25.76 | 25 | 60%15 W · 10 L | -2.9wins | -0.12per pick | 72cpaid | -14.2%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x5410…dcc7backed Under 3.5 | 35c | 57.14$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 74 | 37.8%28 W · 46 L | -1.2wins | -0.02per pick | 39cpaid | -8.6%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x9e77…303fbacked Under 3.5 | 37c | 49.99$18 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$18.5 | 158 | 56.3%89 W · 69 L | +2.9wins | +0.02per pick | 54cpaid | +9.1%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x7547…d158backed Under 3.5 | 35c | 40.83$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.2 | 7,049 | 39.7%2,795 W · 4,254 L | -20.5wins | 0.00per pick | 40cpaid | +0.5%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x0351…d8e8backed Over 3.5 | 66c | 37.12$24 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$12.62 | 12 | 83.3%10 W · 2 L | +3.3wins | +0.28per pick | 56cpaid | +59.6%equal weight | 60+0.09 edge/pick |
| 0x64c3…75abbacked Over 3.5 | 66c | 30.3$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.3 | 115 | 45.2%52 W · 63 L | -6.5wins | -0.06per pick | 51cpaid | -21.7%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x09ce…af35backed Under 3.5 | 35c | 29.97$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.44 | 62 | 64.5%40 W · 22 L | +8.1wins | +0.13per pick | 52cpaid | +28%equal weight | 60+0.09 edge/pick |
| 0xc9a4…3926backed Over 3.5 | 63c | 26.82$17 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$9.92 | 593 | 66.8%396 W · 197 L | -0.6wins | 0.00per pick | 67cpaid | -0.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x52ab…ecebbacked Over 3.5 | 67c | 22.39$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$7.39 | 73 | 54.8%40 W · 33 L | +1.8wins | +0.02per pick | 52cpaid | -0.9%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xae63…9dcdbacked Over 3.5 | 66c | 16.67$11 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$5.67 | 205 | 52.2%107 W · 98 L | -10.0wins | -0.05per pick | 57cpaid | -8.2%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x8123…fbbdbacked Over 3.5 | 64c | 15.63$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$5.63 | 33 | 51.5%17 W · 16 L | -3.1wins | -0.09per pick | 61cpaid | -14.8%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 8 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs. Martin Landaluce: Total Sets O/U 3.5this page
- Cerundolo vs. Landaluce: Match O/U 36.5Over won
- Cerundolo vs. Landaluce: Match O/U 38.5Over won
- Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs. Martin Landaluce: Total Sets O/U 4.5Over 4.5 won
- Roland Garros ATP: Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Martin LandaluceJuan Manuel Cerundolo won
- Set 1 Winner: Cerundolo vs LandaluceCerundolo won
- Set Handicap: Cerundolo (-1.5) vs Landaluce (+1.5)Landaluce won
- Set Handicap: Cerundolo (-2.5) vs Landaluce (+2.5)Landaluce won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.