Premier League · resolved market
Manchester City FC vs. Salford City FC: Both Teams to Score
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x0610620e4bfa2981084ece3a29f284772bfe4a285b7220c0d7cba961a2306dc5
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Noof Yes, No
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Premier Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $6,971
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $7,405
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $6,971 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 18 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Premier League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Premier League | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Yes | 20c | 4,924$979 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$979.13 | 6,117 | 45.8%2,803 W · 3,314 L | -28.6wins | 0.00per pick | 46cpaid | -12.4%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0x479e…91c3backed No | 78c | 3,000$2,340 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$660 | 60 | 66.7%40 W · 20 L | +2.1wins | +0.03per pick | 63cpaid | +6.2%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked No | 64c | 326.92$210 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$117.2 | 4,744 | 41.8%1,983 W · 2,761 L | +28.2wins | +0.01per pick | 41cpaid | -14.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xdbb9…ed8dbacked Yes | 42c | 292.33$123 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$122.61 | 492 | 54.9%270 W · 222 L | +5.4wins | +0.01per pick | 54cpaid | +6.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xa4cf…3e8cbacked No | 63c | 157.91$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$57.91 | 16 | 56.3%9 W · 7 L | +1.9wins | +0.12per pick | 45cpaid | +41.7%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x1d94…9100backed No | 59c | 116.26$69 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$47.4 | 1,264 | 33.7%426 W · 838 L | +13.1wins | +0.01per pick | 33cpaid | -1.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xa4bd…e8a2backed No | 70c | 98.53$69 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$29.23 | 891 | 52.9%471 W · 420 L | -4.5wins | -0.01per pick | 53cpaid | -9.5%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0x77bc…b91bbacked No | 75c | 95$71 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$23.75 | 1,934 | 42.4%820 W · 1,114 L | -43.1wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -18%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…1c65backed No | 65c | 92.92$60 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$32.92 | 85 | 51.8%44 W · 41 L | -0.9wins | -0.01per pick | 53cpaid | -1.6%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xe5a0…20dabacked Yes | 18c | 83.33$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15 | 62 | 32.3%20 W · 42 L | -3.4wins | -0.06per pick | 38cpaid | -16.3%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xc4db…7e0cbacked No | 58c | 75.11$44 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$31.55 | 150 | 38%57 W · 93 L | -4.5wins | -0.03per pick | 41cpaid | -8.2%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xe6e6…79b5backed No | 62c | 50$31 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$19 | 43 | 72.1%31 W · 12 L | +0.3wins | +0.01per pick | 71cpaid | +0.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x22cc…8aeabacked No | 61c | 31.15$19 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$12.15 | 191 | 54.5%104 W · 87 L | +6.4wins | +0.03per pick | 51cpaid | +1.4%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x5843…fb53backed No | 65c | 30.77$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.77 | 8 | 50%4 W · 4 L | -0.7wins | -0.09per pick | 59cpaid | -17.4%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x9750…7956backed No | 72c | 30$22 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$8.4 | 14 | 64.3%9 W · 5 L | +0.1wins | +0.01per pick | 63cpaid | +0.4%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x200f…7a96backed No | 56c | 22$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$9.68 | 1,615 | 53%856 W · 759 L | +33.6wins | +0.02per pick | 51cpaid | +4.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xf280…b65bbacked No | 59c | 21.88$13 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$8.88 | 67 | 31.3%21 W · 46 L | +1.0wins | +0.01per pick | 30cpaid | -17.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x471a…6bf0backed No | 63c | 20$13 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$7.4 | 9 | 44.4%4 W · 5 L | -0.7wins | -0.08per pick | 52cpaid | -10.1%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Premier League and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 6 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Manchester City FC vs. Salford City FC: Both Teams to Scorethis page
- Manchester City FC vs. Salford City FC: O/U 1.5Over won
- Manchester City FC vs. Salford City FC: O/U 2.5Under won
- Manchester City FC vs. Salford City FC: O/U 3.5Under won
- Manchester City FC vs. Salford City FC: O/U 4.5Under won
- Spread: Manchester City FC (-3.5)Salford City FC won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.