MLB · resolved market
Spread: Texas Rangers (-1.5)
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x2daa20d025ee3348e49f0c694d5292b87564652c48a4c34a7331cfb43a45754c
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Texas Rangersof Texas Rangers, Chicago Cubs
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- MLBevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $2,642
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $2,586
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $2,642 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 24 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in MLB is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in MLB | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xadfb…c2efbacked Chicago Cubs | 64c | 1,000$640 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$640 | 2,407 | 48.5%1,167 W · 1,240 L | -62.3wins | -0.03per pick | 51cpaid | -4.6%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Texas Rangers | 35c | 923.07$319 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$603.8 | 12,247 | 46.4%5,687 W · 6,560 L | -68.6wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -9.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x14e4…eabbbacked Texas Rangers | 38c | 242$92 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$150.04 | 509 | 49.5%252 W · 257 L | +2.9wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | +1.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Chicago Cubs | 9c | 212.21$19 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.35 | 8,086 | 46.1%3,728 W · 4,358 L | +29.9wins | 0.00per pick | 46cpaid | -7.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x5628…abbcbacked Chicago Cubs | 64c | 146.85$94 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$93.99 | 1,435 | 50%717 W · 718 L | -15.8wins | -0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -1.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xbca0…9705backed Chicago Cubs | 75c | 135.46$102 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$101.59 | 8,470 | 52.6%4,459 W · 4,011 L | +510.0wins | +0.06per pick | 47cpaid | +5.3%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x1a59…a57ebacked Texas Rangers | 29c | 91.64$27 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$64.74 | 677 | 42.2%286 W · 391 L | -36.7wins | -0.05per pick | 48cpaid | -18%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x1e3b…e232backed Chicago Cubs | 64c | 60$38 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$38.4 | 2,947 | 51.9%1,529 W · 1,418 L | -34.0wins | -0.01per pick | 53cpaid | -2%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x2827…64f6backed Chicago Cubs | 62c | 59.95$37 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$37.17 | 207 | 64.7%134 W · 73 L | +21.2wins | +0.10per pick | 55cpaid | +21.2%equal weight | 60+0.09 edge/pick |
| 0x39fc…e2f2backed Chicago Cubs | 80c | 54.95$44 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$43.96 | 3,208 | 51.2%1,642 W · 1,566 L | +146.6wins | +0.05per pick | 47cpaid | +8.6%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x0905…e5c0backed Texas Rangers | 36c | 50$18 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$32 | 1,661 | 43.5%722 W · 939 L | -0.5wins | 0.00per pick | 43cpaid | -0.8%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x0eca…c56abacked Texas Rangers | 30c | 47.99$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$33.59 | 499 | 42.9%214 W · 285 L | -31.5wins | -0.06per pick | 49cpaid | -20.4%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0xa9f5…937fbacked Texas Rangers | 29c | 45.95$13 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$32.56 | 2,545 | 45.9%1,168 W · 1,377 L | -73.6wins | -0.03per pick | 49cpaid | -14.9%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xda77…683fbacked Texas Rangers | 30c | 42$13 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$29.47 | 5,786 | 43.6%2,524 W · 3,262 L | -192.2wins | -0.03per pick | 47cpaid | -19.3%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x75dc…4f82backed Chicago Cubs | 71c | 32.06$23 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$22.64 | 304 | 54.3%165 W · 139 L | +6.9wins | +0.02per pick | 52cpaid | +7.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x7baa…03b7backed Chicago Cubs | 71c | 32.06$23 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$22.64 | 198 | 55.1%109 W · 89 L | +6.0wins | +0.03per pick | 52cpaid | +8.2%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xdbdd…a5debacked Chicago Cubs | 70c | 32$22 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$22.28 | 1,865 | 52%970 W · 895 L | +50.8wins | +0.03per pick | 49cpaid | +9.1%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x61d3…189abacked Chicago Cubs | 71c | 31.89$23 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$22.64 | 238 | 54.2%129 W · 109 L | +11.4wins | +0.05per pick | 49cpaid | +17.9%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xa11f…1252backed Chicago Cubs | 71c | 31.74$23 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$22.65 | 186 | 51.1%95 W · 91 L | 0.0wins | 0.00per pick | 51cpaid | -2.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x1024…9651backed Chicago Cubs | 65c | 30.77$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 335 | 56.1%188 W · 147 L | -2.9wins | -0.01per pick | 57cpaid | -2%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x6b23…04a3backed Chicago Cubs | 70c | 28.51$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 3,457 | 51.3%1,772 W · 1,685 L | +108.1wins | +0.03per pick | 48cpaid | +1.6%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xa04d…1488backed Chicago Cubs | 71c | 27.63$19 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.5 | 447 | 37.4%167 W · 280 L | -24.1wins | -0.05per pick | 43cpaid | -14.9%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xcf5e…95e3backed Chicago Cubs | 72c | 27.55$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.72 | 267 | 52.8%141 W · 126 L | +1.7wins | +0.01per pick | 52cpaid | +2.2%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xf898…e720backed Texas Rangers | 52c | 21.96$11 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.62 | 6,303 | 48.2%3,041 W · 3,262 L | +181.4wins | +0.03per pick | 45cpaid | +0.8%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in MLB and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 7 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Spread: Texas Rangers (-1.5)this page
- Chicago Cubs vs. Texas RangersTexas Rangers won
- Chicago Cubs vs. Texas Rangers: O/U 7.5Under won
- Chicago Cubs vs. Texas Rangers: O/U 8.5Under won
- Spread: Chicago Cubs (-1.5)Texas Rangers won
- Spread: Texas Rangers (-2.5)Texas Rangers won
- Will there be a run scored in the first inning?: Chicago Cubs vs. Texas RangersNo won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.