Asian League · resolved market
Qingdao Hainiu FC vs. Shanghai Haigang FC: O/U 3.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x5d5a43e248795b74865d26a1e9e9ff8baed781c121f2e82bf865df00471545d0
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Overof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Asian Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $4,924
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $5,668
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $4,924 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 20 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Asian League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Asian League | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Over | 57c | 2,058$1,178 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$879.76 | 2,522 | 42.3%1,067 W · 1,455 L | +54.6wins | +0.02per pick | 40cpaid | -5.9%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xf0f7…0c5abacked Under | 42c | 2,016$852 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$852.25 | 102 | 35.3%36 W · 66 L | -9.1wins | -0.09per pick | 44cpaid | -22.2%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x84ad…bfb7backed Under | 65c | 338.13$220 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$219.97 | 1,522 | 54.9%835 W · 687 L | +5.9wins | 0.00per pick | 54cpaid | -6.4%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Under | 66c | 296.81$196 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$196.39 | 5,946 | 46.1%2,743 W · 3,203 L | +50.5wins | +0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -6.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x26f2…1761backed Over | 31c | 222.4$70 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$152.4 | 99 | 50.5%50 W · 49 L | +0.9wins | +0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xba8d…009dbacked Over | 31c | 204.76$64 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$140.73 | 106 | 26.4%28 W · 78 L | -4.5wins | -0.04per pick | 31cpaid | -18.1%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xdc4f…9804backed Under | 69c | 150$103 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$103 | 405 | 50.6%205 W · 200 L | -1.2wins | 0.00per pick | 51cpaid | -3.6%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x6e5b…bb9abacked Under | 71c | 112.68$80 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$80 | 78 | 56.4%44 W · 34 L | -3.4wins | -0.04per pick | 61cpaid | -11.8%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xd37a…2358backed Over | 34c | 106.34$36 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$70.18 | 899 | 55.1%495 W · 404 L | +5.6wins | +0.01per pick | 54cpaid | -4.1%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x77bc…b91bbacked Under | 66c | 97.27$64 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$64.17 | 1,356 | 45.5%617 W · 739 L | +15.0wins | +0.01per pick | 44cpaid | -13.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x473e…c0f6backed Over | 49c | 95.46$47 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$48.29 | 23 | 34.8%8 W · 15 L | -1.4wins | -0.06per pick | 41cpaid | -29%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x0dd3…dc9bbacked Over | 42c | 95.24$40 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$55.24 | 16 | 68.8%11 W · 5 L | +2.7wins | +0.17per pick | 52cpaid | +38.7%equal weight | 57+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x9637…a576backed Over | 31c | 80.65$25 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$55.65 | 181 | 38.7%70 W · 111 L | +14.5wins | +0.08per pick | 31cpaid | +27.8%equal weight | 58+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x51eb…6bfabacked Under | 71c | 70.42$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 158 | 50%79 W · 79 L | -14.3wins | -0.09per pick | 59cpaid | -15.1%equal weight | 41-0.08 edge/pick |
| 0x200f…7a96backed Over | 29c | 58.56$17 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$41.5 | 1,970 | 54.4%1,071 W · 899 L | +32.9wins | +0.02per pick | 53cpaid | +2.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x15ee…512dbacked Over | 35c | 57$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$37.05 | 155 | 49%76 W · 79 L | +1.2wins | +0.01per pick | 48cpaid | +4.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x951f…e430backed Over | 39c | 51.44$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$31.44 | 7 | 71.4%5 W · 2 L | +2.0wins | +0.29per pick | 43cpaid | +90.5%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x29a5…a3c4backed Over | 29c | 37$11 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$26.22 | 324 | 57.1%185 W · 139 L | +12.7wins | +0.04per pick | 53cpaid | +3.9%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x1105…09d0backed Under | 65c | 24.65$16 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$16.02 | 135 | 63.7%86 W · 49 L | -6.4wins | -0.05per pick | 68cpaid | -6.7%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xb66c…a0f5backed Under | 69c | 17.4$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$12 | 154 | 55.8%86 W · 68 L | +2.4wins | +0.02per pick | 54cpaid | +0.2%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Asian League and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 7 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Qingdao Hainiu FC vs. Shanghai Haigang FC: O/U 3.5this page
- Qingdao Hainiu FC vs. Shanghai Haigang FC: O/U 1.5Over won
- Qingdao Hainiu FC vs. Shanghai Haigang FC: O/U 2.5Over won
- Qingdao Hainiu FC vs. Shanghai Haigang FC: O/U 4.5Under won
- Spread: Qingdao Hainiu FC (-1.5)Qingdao Hainiu FC won
- Spread: Shanghai Haigang FC (-1.5)Qingdao Hainiu FC won
- Spread: Shanghai Haigang FC (-2.5)Qingdao Hainiu FC won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.