TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

Tennis · resolved market

Set 1 Winner: Borges vs Rublev

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
Rublevof Borges, Rublev
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$4,277
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$5,741

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $4,277 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 21 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in Tennis
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0xb4d2…ce99backed Rublev61c708.39$436 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$272.874,92138.7%1,905 W · 3,016 L-20.0wins0.00per pick39cpaid-7.5%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x7462…3ac3backed Borges37c580.91$215 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$214.941,68150%841 W · 840 L+30.2wins+0.02per pick48cpaid+13%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xb4d0…a1c5backed Borges52c327.35$170 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1701,56640%627 W · 939 L-32.0wins-0.02per pick42cpaid-8.5%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x5e30…acbfbacked Borges34c220.03$74 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$73.737,72447.8%3,691 W · 4,033 L+41.2wins+0.01per pick47cpaid+1.2%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0xda77…683fbacked Rublev60c215.67$129 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$86.375,41648.6%2,633 W · 2,783 L+14.5wins0.00per pick48cpaid-9.9%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x29fa…939bbacked Rublev55c201.13$111 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$90.331942.1%8 W · 11 L-2.3wins-0.12per pick54cpaid-32.4%equal weight44-0.05 edge/pick
0x03c7…22f2backed Rublev67c199.09$132 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$66.6154249.3%267 W · 275 L-17.1wins-0.03per pick52cpaid-6.6%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0xb6a8…b1f7backed Rublev60c191.67$115 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$76.6728738.3%110 W · 177 L-3.2wins-0.01per pick39cpaid-5.5%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x7179…7d79backed Borges37c179.89$67 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$67.442,60146.5%1,209 W · 1,392 L+18.8wins+0.01per pick46cpaid+0.8%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x133a…504abacked Borges37c162.16$60 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$603,42439.1%1,338 W · 2,086 L-12.3wins0.00per pick39cpaid-1%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xc33d…0d40backed Borges24c106.09$25 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$25.3865346.4%303 W · 350 L+7.0wins+0.01per pick45cpaid-11.4%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x3cad…92f0backed Borges37c89.19$33 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$333,22040.5%1,305 W · 1,915 L+28.3wins+0.01per pick40cpaid+2.4%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x9888…e6febacked Rublev63c84.96$54 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$31.382,44745.9%1,123 W · 1,324 L-12.9wins-0.01per pick46cpaid-5.7%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x26d9…6171backed Rublev66c57.24$38 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$19.46650%3 W · 3 L0.0wins0.00per pick50cpaid-26.3%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xcb1b…69f2backed Borges34c50$17 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1758745.7%268 W · 319 L-4.2wins-0.01per pick46cpaid-1%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x200f…7a96backed Borges35c33.49$12 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$11.827,13949.7%3,548 W · 3,591 L+109.9wins+0.02per pick48cpaid+3.3%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x2db3…667abacked Borges51c33.42$17 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1725448.4%123 W · 131 L-3.4wins-0.01per pick50cpaid-5.9%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x03ba…bebabacked Borges34c31$11 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$10.541,02843.3%445 W · 583 L-24.5wins-0.02per pick46cpaid-21.5%equal weight47-0.02 edge/pick
0x51eb…6bfabacked Rublev65c28.49$19 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$9.972,56163%1,613 W · 948 L-10.2wins0.00per pick63cpaid-0.8%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xa4d4…ef77backed Rublev66c21.03$14 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$7.15580%4 W · 1 L+0.9wins+0.17per pick63cpaid+29.6%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0x679e…6545backed Rublev75c15$11 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$3.754100%4 W · 0 L+1.4wins+0.36per pick64cpaid+61.1%equal weight56+0.05 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.

The rest of this event

Polymarket sells these questions together. 9 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.