TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

Tennis · resolved market

Set Handicap: Rublev (-2.5) vs Borges (+2.5)

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
Rublevof Rublev, Borges
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$4,749
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$5,623

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $4,749 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 21 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in Tennis
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0xe922…39b3backed Rublev18c1,315$238 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$1,0774131.7%13 W · 28 L-6.0wins-0.15per pick46cpaid-28.5%equal weight40-0.09 edge/pick
0x48cf…c7dfbacked Borges69c1,019$708 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$708.2719452.1%101 W · 93 L-13.6wins-0.07per pick59cpaid-11.9%equal weight43-0.06 edge/pick
0xb693…cfc9backed Rublev36c890.99$317 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$573.6630847.7%147 W · 161 L-5.2wins-0.02per pick49cpaid-4.2%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x5e30…acbfbacked Borges66c767.02$506 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$506.247,72447.8%3,691 W · 4,033 L+41.2wins+0.01per pick47cpaid+1.2%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0xc60b…d9f7backed Rublev31c500$155 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$34535439.8%141 W · 213 L-15.0wins-0.04per pick44cpaid-12.1%equal weight46-0.04 edge/pick
0xc470…c792backed Rublev30c333.33$100 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$233.331,50435.1%528 W · 976 L+12.5wins+0.01per pick34cpaid+0.7%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0xbc9f…21f7backed Borges70c201.92$141 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$141.346266.1%41 W · 21 L-1.8wins-0.03per pick69cpaid-2.7%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0xedf7…4003backed Rublev30c185.92$56 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$130.1492138.4%354 W · 567 L+11.2wins+0.01per pick37cpaid+1.3%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x36b3…e421backed Rublev30c109.42$33 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$76.5985250%426 W · 426 L+22.4wins+0.03per pick47cpaid+5.6%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0xf7f0…912cbacked Rublev30c61.92$19 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$43.447854.8%262 W · 216 L+25.6wins+0.05per pick49cpaid+23.4%equal weight56+0.05 edge/pick
0xe22f…49b1backed Borges51c58.82$30 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$308248.8%40 W · 42 L-1.1wins-0.01per pick50cpaid-8.3%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x0690…8821backed Borges71c49.58$35 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$357159.2%42 W · 29 L-2.9wins-0.04per pick63cpaid-8.6%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0xa0c5…4291backed Rublev30c40$12 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$28.29244.6%41 W · 51 L+0.9wins+0.01per pick44cpaid+1.1%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x1dd2…9e07backed Rublev31c35.32$11 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$24.372,41851.7%1,249 W · 1,169 L+10.3wins0.00per pick51cpaid+0.9%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xc85f…15f8backed Borges70c30$21 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$2121655.6%120 W · 96 L+4.0wins+0.02per pick54cpaid+0.1%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x36aa…a683backed Borges69c28.99$20 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$2013650%68 W · 68 L+0.2wins0.00per pick50cpaid-3.4%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x6207…2356backed Borges72c27.85$20 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$207751.9%40 W · 37 L+2.6wins+0.03per pick49cpaid+12.3%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0x8fe7…6c1fbacked Borges51c26$13 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$13.2633550.1%168 W · 167 L+11.6wins+0.03per pick47cpaid+10%equal weight54+0.03 edge/pick
0x6562…4e48backed Borges71c25.16$18 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$17.8614456.3%81 W · 63 L-10.7wins-0.07per pick64cpaid-11.4%equal weight43-0.06 edge/pick
0xf18a…e4e5backed Rublev45c24.89$11 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$13.632,34351.6%1,209 W · 1,134 L+95.2wins+0.04per pick48cpaid+0.3%equal weight54+0.04 edge/pick
0xfa01…f0a7backed Borges70c16$11 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$11.289850.1%450 W · 448 L-20.3wins-0.02per pick52cpaid-7.3%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.

The rest of this event

Polymarket sells these questions together. 9 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.