Tennis · resolved market
Cincinnati Open (Doubles): Jovic/McNally vs Jiang/Zhang
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x88ae4f5b9ff4ffd4e976c7057ab3d5966d627491907b632c15caefca5f007601
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Jovic/McNallyof Jovic/McNally, Jiang/Zhang
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $7,439
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $8,596
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $7,439 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 27 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xe1e3…f1bdbacked Jiang/Zhang | 51c | 1,952$998 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$997.68 | 883 | 58.2%514 W · 369 L | +12.9wins | +0.01per pick | 57cpaid | -2.9%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xe911…3d4ebacked Jiang/Zhang | 51c | 1,670$853 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$852.58 | 4,426 | 51.8%2,291 W · 2,135 L | +136.7wins | +0.03per pick | 49cpaid | +0.4%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x5b63…11a4backed Jovic/McNally | 45c | 1,614$730 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$884.11 | 4,934 | 41.5%2,048 W · 2,886 L | -77.0wins | -0.02per pick | 43cpaid | -15.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x86b1…c094backed Jovic/McNally | 51c | 1,228$627 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$600.66 | 580 | 21.9%127 W · 453 L | +2.5wins | 0.00per pick | 21cpaid | -13.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x3a14…9fe4backed Jovic/McNally | 54c | 740.74$400 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$340.74 | 409 | 35.7%146 W · 263 L | +7.8wins | +0.02per pick | 34cpaid | -3%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x9e3e…f882backed Jiang/Zhang | 67c | 581.78$391 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$391.46 | 1,042 | 36.5%380 W · 662 L | -20.2wins | -0.02per pick | 38cpaid | -23.9%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xc4fe…601fbacked Jovic/McNally | 39c | 444.16$171 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$272.74 | 6,449 | 46.3%2,987 W · 3,462 L | -42.9wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -13%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xb624…3d80backed Jovic/McNally | 47c | 319.94$150 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$169.94 | 144 | 39.6%57 W · 87 L | +4.4wins | +0.03per pick | 37cpaid | +6%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x8027…2ee8backed Jiang/Zhang | 35c | 282.37$99 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$98.83 | 80 | 22.5%18 W · 62 L | -2.4wins | -0.03per pick | 26cpaid | -13.6%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x3a34…51fabacked Jiang/Zhang | 32c | 137.5$44 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$44 | 220 | 20%44 W · 176 L | +1.6wins | +0.01per pick | 19cpaid | -2.2%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xab41…c453backed Jovic/McNally | 53c | 80.47$43 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$37.84 | 330 | 62.7%207 W · 123 L | +11.2wins | +0.03per pick | 59cpaid | -0.1%equal weight | 54+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xbfd7…f0bfbacked Jovic/McNally | 58c | 73.39$43 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$30.56 | 7,816 | 50.6%3,958 W · 3,858 L | +95.4wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -4.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x7e39…fe16backed Jiang/Zhang | 32c | 62.5$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 710 | 21.3%151 W · 559 L | -28.0wins | -0.04per pick | 25cpaid | -14%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xae51…1d03backed Jovic/McNally | 75c | 62.3$47 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.39 | 155 | 54.2%84 W · 71 L | +11.7wins | +0.08per pick | 47cpaid | 0%equal weight | 57+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x8bfa…a8debacked Jovic/McNally | 39c | 54.35$21 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$33.35 | 359 | 51.3%184 W · 175 L | +9.4wins | +0.03per pick | 49cpaid | +8.1%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xd218…b5c9backed Jovic/McNally | 69c | 50.67$35 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.77 | 6,720 | 36.9%2,479 W · 4,241 L | -95.8wins | -0.01per pick | 38cpaid | -20.5%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xe3db…c173backed Jiang/Zhang | 39c | 48$19 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$18.8 | 185 | 40%74 W · 111 L | -8.5wins | -0.05per pick | 45cpaid | -13.2%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x0f87…e128backed Jovic/McNally | 53c | 37.74$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$17.74 | 4 | 100%4 W · 0 L | +2.1wins | +0.52per pick | 48cpaid | +111.3%equal weight | 58+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0xad22…1e9fbacked Jovic/McNally | 46c | 34.57$16 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$18.53 | 34 | 38.2%13 W · 21 L | -0.4wins | -0.01per pick | 40cpaid | -6.2%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x1ba2…d212backed Jovic/McNally | 65c | 31.4$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.99 | 1,959 | 43.7%857 W · 1,102 L | -20.9wins | -0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -14.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x9c5b…ec01backed Jovic/McNally | 45c | 27$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$14.82 | 255 | 42%107 W · 148 L | +5.5wins | +0.02per pick | 40cpaid | +1.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x40e9…494fbacked Jovic/McNally | 50c | 26$13 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$12.92 | 447 | 29.3%131 W · 316 L | -10.7wins | -0.02per pick | 32cpaid | -33.8%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x49c5…3de7backed Jiang/Zhang | 53c | 23.98$13 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$12.59 | 208 | 57.2%119 W · 89 L | -4.7wins | -0.02per pick | 59cpaid | -2.1%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xf3a3…3f10backed Jovic/McNally | 48c | 21.9$11 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11.34 | 44 | 50%22 W · 22 L | +0.5wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -1.9%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5210…bd53backed Jiang/Zhang | 55c | 19.13$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.5 | 3,874 | 45.4%1,758 W · 2,116 L | -39.6wins | -0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xb4bf…60f8backed Jiang/Zhang | 55c | 19.12$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.49 | 690 | 47%324 W · 366 L | -7.7wins | -0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -10.1%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0ec7…93d1backed Jovic/McNally | 73c | 16.88$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$4.52 | 106 | 78.3%83 W · 23 L | +11.4wins | +0.11per pick | 68cpaid | +15.4%equal weight | 60+0.09 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.