TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

Champions League · resolved market

Will a club from Europe win the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup?

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
Yesof Yes, No
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
Champions Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$60,647
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$66,930

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $60,647 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 22 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Champions League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in Champions League
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0x4ffe…9f71backed No1c6,591$34 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$34.261877%13 W · 174 L-5.8wins-0.03per pick10cpaid-53.3%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0x0e3e…692abacked No14c2,081$300 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$299.86520%1 W · 4 L-1.3wins-0.25per pick45cpaid-72%equal weight45-0.04 edge/pick
0x6f19…b9ffbacked No15c2,010$293 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$292.634351.2%22 W · 21 L+1.8wins+0.04per pick47cpaid-0.7%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0xcf37…993fbacked No6c1,468$95 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$94.84330.2%13 W · 30 L-1.2wins-0.03per pick33cpaid-26.9%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x0a7e…fce4backed No11c1,065$116 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$116.3529136.8%107 W · 184 L+5.3wins+0.02per pick35cpaid-3.7%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x3e43…18a1backed No11c581.99$65 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$64.620%0 W · 2 L-0.2wins-0.10per pick10cpaid-100%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x975b…2d5fbacked No10c489.02$49 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$48.841118.2%2 W · 9 L-0.8wins-0.07per pick25cpaid-68.2%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0xc7b8…2c1fbacked No17c329.98$57 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$57.420%0 W · 2 L-0.4wins-0.19per pick19cpaid-100%equal weight48-0.01 edge/pick
0xaf9d…a540backed No12c308.95$36 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$36.194647.8%22 W · 24 L-1.7wins-0.04per pick51cpaid-20%equal weight47-0.02 edge/pick
0x94ce…bdecbacked No7c200$14 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1420%0 W · 2 L-0.2wins-0.08per pick8cpaid-100%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x79a0…96c7backed No16c190.55$30 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$3010%0 W · 1 L-0.2wins-0.16per pick16cpaid-100%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x552e…3a64backed No16c162$26 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$26.2110%0 W · 1 L-0.2wins-0.16per pick16cpaid-100%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x71b1…ac2cbacked No8c149.98$12 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$12812.5%1 W · 7 L-1.5wins-0.18per pick31cpaid-80.4%equal weight45-0.04 edge/pick
0x3078…0389backed No13c134.35$17 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$17.3616327%44 W · 119 L-1.9wins-0.01per pick28cpaid+0.3%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0xfb9d…d78ebacked No11c129.64$15 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$14.91145.5%5 W · 6 L+0.8wins+0.07per pick38cpaid+12.8%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xf327…0b68backed Yes80c119.83$95 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$24.46650%3 W · 3 L-0.4wins-0.07per pick57cpaid-19.6%equal weight48-0.01 edge/pick
0x442a…7c94backed No14c100$15 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$14.55437%20 W · 34 L+2.8wins+0.05per pick32cpaid-5.8%equal weight54+0.04 edge/pick
0x5ae2…ff6cbacked No16c95.12$15 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$15250%1 W · 1 L+0.5wins+0.25per pick25cpaid+47.1%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x8725…eb10backed No14c90.14$13 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$12.7820241.6%84 W · 118 L-9.7wins-0.05per pick46cpaid-13.1%equal weight45-0.04 edge/pick
0x3095…8e0ebacked No13c83.15$11 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$115829.3%17 W · 41 L-1.6wins-0.03per pick32cpaid-20.9%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x8904…01d3backed Yes66c40.24$27 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$13.641100%1 W · 0 L+0.3wins+0.34per pick66cpaid+51.3%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x147a…cc62backed Yes64c30$19 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$10.73100%3 W · 0 L+1.2wins+0.39per pick61cpaid+77.3%equal weight55+0.04 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Champions League and say nothing about this market.

The rest of this event

Polymarket sells these questions together. 4 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.