TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

MLB · resolved market

Spread: San Francisco Giants (-2.5)

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
Arizona Diamondbacksof San Francisco Giants, Arizona Diamondbacks
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
MLBevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$8,533
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$9,016

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $8,533 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 19 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in MLB is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in MLB
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0xfe78…0319backed San Francisco Giants22c6,114$1,349 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1,349.4310,84651.6%5,594 W · 5,252 L+137.6wins+0.01per pick50cpaid-0.3%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x204f…5e14backed Arizona Diamondbacks78c5,601$4,365 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$1,235.1512,24746.4%5,687 W · 6,560 L-68.6wins-0.01per pick47cpaid-9.5%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x5268…135dbacked San Francisco Giants22c500.79$112 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$111.9511,35752.9%6,003 W · 5,354 L+209.9wins+0.02per pick51cpaid-0.2%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xc718…64a8backed Arizona Diamondbacks78c394.65$308 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$86.951,08356.3%610 W · 473 L+13.7wins+0.01per pick55cpaid+0.4%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x4259…77c1backed Arizona Diamondbacks76c386.37$294 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$92.732,24357.6%1,293 W · 950 L+37.1wins+0.02per pick56cpaid+2.6%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xa623…a4febacked Arizona Diamondbacks78c302$236 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$66.441,11945.5%509 W · 610 L+16.9wins+0.02per pick44cpaid+5.6%equal weight52+0.01 edge/pick
0x32ed…f960backed San Francisco Giants24c213.73$51 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$51.36,11655.3%3,385 W · 2,731 L+344.6wins+0.06per pick50cpaid+8.6%equal weight56+0.06 edge/pick
0x52d9…fb1abacked San Francisco Giants26c181$47 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$47.0699624.6%245 W · 751 L-70.1wins-0.07per pick32cpaid-24.3%equal weight42-0.07 edge/pick
0x1440…1a39backed Arizona Diamondbacks74c139.24$103 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$35.922450%12 W · 12 L+1.1wins+0.05per pick45cpaid+2.3%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x93ac…2761backed Arizona Diamondbacks75c80.36$60 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$20.092,58361.4%1,587 W · 996 L+70.9wins+0.03per pick59cpaid+4.3%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0x0d2d…7ff5backed Arizona Diamondbacks37c76.42$28 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$48.28,29547.8%3,966 W · 4,329 L+72.4wins+0.01per pick47cpaid-4.3%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0xc546…058ebacked Arizona Diamondbacks77c60$46 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$13.85,12754.7%2,805 W · 2,322 L+232.0wins+0.05per pick50cpaid+7.8%equal weight55+0.05 edge/pick
0x0d5f…1171backed Arizona Diamondbacks78c36.67$29 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$8.0758054.5%316 W · 264 L+17.3wins+0.03per pick51cpaid+4%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0x19b7…9ee6backed Arizona Diamondbacks74c33.07$24 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$8.61,03851.7%537 W · 501 L+1.2wins0.00per pick52cpaid-4.1%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x8232…e71dbacked Arizona Diamondbacks78c32.24$25 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$7.094542.2%19 W · 26 L-3.3wins-0.07per pick50cpaid-23%equal weight45-0.05 edge/pick
0x27b1…6a0bbacked Arizona Diamondbacks78c28.88$23 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$6.3546952.5%246 W · 223 L-4.1wins-0.01per pick53cpaid-4.4%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0xc37e…9e64backed Arizona Diamondbacks78c23.59$18 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$5.1929553.2%157 W · 138 L+7.9wins+0.03per pick51cpaid+6.7%equal weight53+0.02 edge/pick
0x5a21…9318backed Arizona Diamondbacks62c17.69$11 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$6.8143954.7%240 W · 199 L+30.6wins+0.07per pick48cpaid+13.9%equal weight57+0.07 edge/pick
0x18d2…e9c3backed Arizona Diamondbacks77c17.55$14 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$4.0410768.2%73 W · 34 L+1.4wins+0.01per pick67cpaid+2.5%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in MLB and say nothing about this market.

The rest of this event

Polymarket sells these questions together. 13 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.