South American Leagues · resolved market
CA Banfield vs. CA Sarmiento: Both Teams to Score
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x76d1d9bc3d5e603e5e2f13aff48d129c07116956c071d21e7d5db2156ee875ea
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Yesof Yes, No
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- South American Leaguesevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $2,037
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $2,061
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $2,037 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 20 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in South American Leagues is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in South American Leagues | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Yes | 47c | 294.52$139 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$155.08 | 8,107 | 48.7%3,948 W · 4,159 L | +26.8wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | -8.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x24ae…d35bbacked No | 56c | 200$112 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$112 | 50 | 42%21 W · 29 L | -3.3wins | -0.07per pick | 49cpaid | -12%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x6d3c…d294backed No | 55c | 167.91$93 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$92.76 | 1,944 | 51.3%998 W · 946 L | +40.6wins | +0.02per pick | 49cpaid | +7.9%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x1e7a…f252backed Yes | 45c | 122.22$55 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$67.22 | 21 | 42.9%9 W · 12 L | -0.3wins | -0.01per pick | 44cpaid | -4.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x7c31…5380backed No | 57c | 111.79$63 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$63.27 | 114 | 57%65 W · 49 L | +2.5wins | +0.02per pick | 55cpaid | +7.9%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x789c…0d10backed Yes | 45c | 108.24$49 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$59.53 | 552 | 50.2%277 W · 275 L | +1.0wins | 0.00per pick | 50cpaid | -5.8%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xe907…cff6backed Yes | 43c | 108.24$47 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$61.49 | 1,439 | 37.5%540 W · 899 L | +4.1wins | 0.00per pick | 37cpaid | +0.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x8056…9507backed Yes | 41c | 105.31$43 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$62.46 | 52 | 51.9%27 W · 25 L | +1.6wins | +0.03per pick | 49cpaid | +1.2%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2a69…d2f7backed Yes | 44c | 104.5$46 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$58.52 | 2,514 | 39%980 W · 1,534 L | -32.2wins | -0.01per pick | 40cpaid | -14%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x3a36…79d3backed No | 56c | 100$56 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$56 | 44 | 43.2%19 W · 25 L | -1.8wins | -0.04per pick | 47cpaid | -12.5%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xda77…683fbacked No | 42c | 90.1$38 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$37.62 | 898 | 46.1%414 W · 484 L | -11.8wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -18.7%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x1262…2fc9backed Yes | 44c | 59.5$26 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$33.47 | 85 | 54.1%46 W · 39 L | +4.0wins | +0.05per pick | 49cpaid | -4.2%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x560b…a72dbacked Yes | 31c | 55.21$17 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$38 | 4 | 50%2 W · 2 L | +0.9wins | +0.22per pick | 28cpaid | +18.7%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x2077…8161backed No | 60c | 54$32 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$32.4 | 47 | 63.8%30 W · 17 L | +0.1wins | 0.00per pick | 64cpaid | +2.8%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x5210…bd53backed No | 59c | 46.44$27 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$27.4 | 424 | 62.3%264 W · 160 L | +24.4wins | +0.06per pick | 57cpaid | +10.4%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xa9f5…937fbacked No | 36c | 46$17 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$16.66 | 1,038 | 49.4%513 W · 525 L | +14.9wins | +0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -6%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x11f4…12dabacked No | 69c | 45$31 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$31 | 43 | 58.1%25 W · 18 L | -4.6wins | -0.11per pick | 69cpaid | -18%equal weight | 43-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0xe399…6bd7backed Yes | 38c | 37.41$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$23.2 | 13 | 46.2%6 W · 7 L | +1.0wins | +0.07per pick | 39cpaid | +32.1%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xbfd7…f0bfbacked No | 64c | 25$16 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$16 | 723 | 50.5%365 W · 358 L | -24.9wins | -0.03per pick | 54cpaid | -9.2%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xfb0c…8c72backed No | 56c | 19.74$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11.05 | 559 | 46%257 W · 302 L | -19.0wins | -0.03per pick | 49cpaid | -8.3%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in South American Leagues and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 12 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- CA Banfield vs. CA Sarmiento: Both Teams to Scorethis page
- CA Banfield vs. CA Sarmiento: 1st Half O/U 0.5Under won
- CA Banfield vs. CA Sarmiento: 1st Half O/U 1.5Under won
- CA Banfield vs. CA Sarmiento: O/U 0.5Over won
- CA Banfield vs. CA Sarmiento: O/U 1.5Over won
- CA Banfield vs. CA Sarmiento: O/U 2.5Over won
- CA Banfield vs. CA Sarmiento: O/U 3.5Over won
- CA Banfield vs. CA Sarmiento: O/U 4.5Over won
- CA Banfield vs. CA Sarmiento: O/U 5.5Under won
- Spread: CA Banfield (-1.5)CA Sarmiento won
- Spread: CA Banfield (-2.5)CA Sarmiento won
- Spread: CA Sarmiento (-1.5)CA Banfield won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.