MLB · resolved market
Spread: Chicago Cubs (-1.5)
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xd7ff9227dd66d6ea33b5a4b96912b4652502bf4f07185aadd689497bebb123b9
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Washington Nationalsof Chicago Cubs, Washington Nationals
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- MLBevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $2,701
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $2,865
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $2,701 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 32 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in MLB is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in MLB | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xd4e2…0f82backed Chicago Cubs | 43c | 468.26$201 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$201.35 | 137 | 43.8%60 W · 77 L | -1.1wins | -0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -1.9%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xfe78…0319backed Washington Nationals | 58c | 326.09$189 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$137.06 | 10,846 | 51.6%5,594 W · 5,252 L | +137.6wins | +0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -0.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xdc41…dd7ebacked Chicago Cubs | 45c | 289$130 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$130.05 | 1,291 | 51%658 W · 633 L | -15.5wins | -0.01per pick | 52cpaid | -2.9%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x9930…696ebacked Washington Nationals | 61c | 234.1$143 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$91.3 | 305 | 48.9%149 W · 156 L | +3.5wins | +0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -1.9%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xa697…59d5backed Washington Nationals | 55c | 222.34$122 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$100.27 | 6,899 | 50.4%3,478 W · 3,421 L | -7.1wins | 0.00per pick | 51cpaid | -0.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xa8f3…e544backed Washington Nationals | 55c | 200$110 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$90 | 1,435 | 50%717 W · 718 L | +25.8wins | +0.02per pick | 48cpaid | +4%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xdd5e…9040backed Chicago Cubs | 45c | 189$85 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$85.05 | 1,851 | 53.1%982 W · 869 L | +18.1wins | +0.01per pick | 52cpaid | +1.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x8351…9bebbacked Washington Nationals | 56c | 178.57$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$78.57 | 652 | 48.3%315 W · 337 L | +1.5wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | +0.7%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xe1e3…f1bdbacked Chicago Cubs | 39c | 170$67 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$66.54 | 214 | 49.5%106 W · 108 L | -3.2wins | -0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -4.6%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xfb88…0e4cbacked Washington Nationals | 61c | 153.84$94 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$60 | 104 | 65.4%68 W · 36 L | +8.2wins | +0.08per pick | 58cpaid | +13%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x6fba…26dcbacked Chicago Cubs | 45c | 111.11$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 231 | 52.8%122 W · 109 L | -8.2wins | -0.04per pick | 56cpaid | -6.1%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x5513…de2abacked Chicago Cubs | 41c | 106.65$44 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$44.11 | 27 | 33.3%9 W · 18 L | -2.2wins | -0.08per pick | 42cpaid | -34.8%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x066f…b576backed Washington Nationals | 55c | 100$55 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$45 | 3,832 | 42.2%1,619 W · 2,213 L | +0.5wins | 0.00per pick | 42cpaid | +0.6%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x702e…ff44backed Washington Nationals | 55c | 100$55 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$45 | 264 | 44.3%117 W · 147 L | -7.2wins | -0.03per pick | 47cpaid | -5.4%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x032e…2a9ebacked Chicago Cubs | 45c | 97$44 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$43.65 | 2,291 | 52.5%1,202 W · 1,089 L | +24.6wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | +3.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xbca0…9705backed Washington Nationals | 54c | 91.04$49 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$41.56 | 8,470 | 52.6%4,459 W · 4,011 L | +510.0wins | +0.06per pick | 47cpaid | +5.3%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x43ed…6232backed Washington Nationals | 57c | 77$44 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$33.11 | 182 | 44.5%81 W · 101 L | -14.3wins | -0.08per pick | 52cpaid | -21.8%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x0d2d…7ff5backed Washington Nationals | 55c | 69.46$38 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$31.43 | 8,295 | 47.8%3,966 W · 4,329 L | +72.4wins | +0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -4.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5268…135dbacked Chicago Cubs | 40c | 50.27$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20.06 | 11,357 | 52.9%6,003 W · 5,354 L | +209.9wins | +0.02per pick | 51cpaid | -0.2%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x9071…0909backed Chicago Cubs | 44c | 46.98$21 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20.67 | 4 | 0%0 W · 4 L | -2.1wins | -0.52per pick | 52cpaid | -100%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x076d…8d4cbacked Chicago Cubs | 44c | 45.59$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20.06 | 190 | 51.1%97 W · 93 L | +8.0wins | +0.04per pick | 47cpaid | +21%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x435d…c52abacked Washington Nationals | 55c | 44.78$25 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$20.15 | 674 | 44.1%297 W · 377 L | +27.8wins | +0.04per pick | 40cpaid | +12.8%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x33c9…5124backed Chicago Cubs | 46c | 43.48$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 412 | 49.5%204 W · 208 L | +6.2wins | +0.02per pick | 48cpaid | +3.8%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xa96b…7d92backed Chicago Cubs | 36c | 41.67$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15 | 190 | 41.1%78 W · 112 L | -10.2wins | -0.05per pick | 46cpaid | -14.9%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x6b23…04a3backed Washington Nationals | 56c | 35.8$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.8 | 3,457 | 51.3%1,772 W · 1,685 L | +108.1wins | +0.03per pick | 48cpaid | +1.6%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x5e53…922dbacked Washington Nationals | 56c | 35.71$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.71 | 297 | 47.1%140 W · 157 L | -7.7wins | -0.03per pick | 50cpaid | -5.3%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x56ac…d77ebacked Chicago Cubs | 45c | 31$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.95 | 716 | 50.7%363 W · 353 L | +9.8wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | +2.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xefde…6505backed Chicago Cubs | 44c | 30.71$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.51 | 1,284 | 49.5%635 W · 649 L | -1.1wins | 0.00per pick | 50cpaid | +3.5%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x95f5…779fbacked Chicago Cubs | 41c | 28.9$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11.87 | 1,056 | 44.3%468 W · 588 L | -25.9wins | -0.02per pick | 47cpaid | -20.6%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x3ca9…424abacked Washington Nationals | 63c | 25$16 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$9.25 | 799 | 55.9%447 W · 352 L | +21.7wins | +0.03per pick | 53cpaid | -3.4%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x87f7…8f45backed Washington Nationals | 73c | 22.71$16 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6.23 | 464 | 44.4%206 W · 258 L | -18.2wins | -0.04per pick | 48cpaid | -16.4%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x8d0c…c90abacked Washington Nationals | 55c | 20$11 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$9 | 2,376 | 49.7%1,182 W · 1,194 L | +17.1wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | +1.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in MLB and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 12 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Spread: Chicago Cubs (-1.5)this page
- Chicago Cubs vs. Washington NationalsWashington Nationals won
- Chicago Cubs vs. Washington Nationals: O/U 5.5Over won
- Chicago Cubs vs. Washington Nationals: O/U 6.5Over won
- Chicago Cubs vs. Washington Nationals: O/U 7.5Under won
- Chicago Cubs vs. Washington Nationals: O/U 8.5Under won
- Chicago Cubs vs. Washington Nationals: O/U 9.5Under won
- Spread: Washington Nationals (-1.5)Washington Nationals won
- Spread: Washington Nationals (-2.5)Washington Nationals won
- Spread: Washington Nationals (-4.5)Washington Nationals won
- Spread: Washington Nationals (-5.5)Washington Nationals won
- Will there be a run scored in the first inning?: Chicago Cubs vs. Washington NationalsNo won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.