Asian League · resolved market
Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: 1st Half O/U 0.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xece24e53cc33117a16796078c63d06b9849a428d5f30a82f0405a0cb6a6cae74
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Underof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Asian Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $16,288
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $16,334
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $16,288 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 25 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Asian League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Asian League | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x44c5…8d45backed Over | 52c | 9,913$5,113 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$5,113.46 | 177 | 53.1%94 W · 83 L | +17.3wins | +0.10per pick | 43cpaid | +22.3%equal weight | 60+0.09 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Under | 45c | 8,129$3,692 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$4,436.89 | 5,963 | 46%2,744 W · 3,219 L | +46.2wins | +0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x2a69…d2f7backed Under | 48c | 2,703$1,288 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$1,414.95 | 1,662 | 36.2%602 W · 1,060 L | -34.7wins | -0.02per pick | 38cpaid | -14.4%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x07ea…a6babacked Over | 76c | 1,318$1,000 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$1,000 | 88 | 43.2%38 W · 50 L | -6.1wins | -0.07per pick | 50cpaid | -14.2%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x1556…b722backed Over | 54c | 999.98$540 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$539.99 | 16 | 31.3%5 W · 11 L | -1.9wins | -0.12per pick | 43cpaid | -40.7%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xc291…5d74backed Under | 27c | 876.68$236 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$640.45 | 2,456 | 37.9%931 W · 1,525 L | +0.1wins | 0.00per pick | 38cpaid | -1.7%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Under | 28c | 786.17$224 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$562.21 | 2,528 | 42.2%1,067 W · 1,461 L | +53.0wins | +0.02per pick | 40cpaid | -6.1%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xa496…0f5abacked Over | 76c | 660.11$502 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$501.68 | 9 | 55.6%5 W · 4 L | -0.8wins | -0.09per pick | 65cpaid | -13%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x03c9…d8c1backed Over | 70c | 466.57$327 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$327.41 | 47 | 63.8%30 W · 17 L | +7.5wins | +0.16per pick | 48cpaid | +48.7%equal weight | 62+0.10 edge/pick |
| 0xad31…c93abacked Under | 27c | 401.37$108 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$293.62 | 42 | 54.8%23 W · 19 L | +6.5wins | +0.16per pick | 39cpaid | +119.9%equal weight | 61+0.10 edge/pick |
| 0xbfd7…f0bfbacked Under | 52c | 310.72$162 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$149.15 | 706 | 52.3%369 W · 337 L | +1.6wins | 0.00per pick | 52cpaid | -1.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x5d63…9075backed Under | 48c | 303.08$146 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$157.14 | 371 | 53.9%200 W · 171 L | +3.7wins | +0.01per pick | 53cpaid | -2.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x425e…ecfabacked Over | 66c | 298$198 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$198.14 | 70 | 50%35 W · 35 L | +1.7wins | +0.02per pick | 48cpaid | +6.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xffac…d469backed Over | 66c | 199.98$131 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$131.19 | 29 | 51.7%15 W · 14 L | -0.4wins | -0.01per pick | 53cpaid | -3.7%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x52d9…fb1abacked Under | 45c | 132$59 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$72.6 | 905 | 44.9%406 W · 499 L | -5.6wins | -0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -2.7%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x1985…51abbacked Over | 55c | 132$73 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$72.6 | 48 | 72.9%35 W · 13 L | +10.9wins | +0.23per pick | 50cpaid | +56.1%equal weight | 67+0.15 edge/pick |
| 0xf497…5ce0backed Over | 52c | 124.99$65 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$64.9 | 280 | 40.4%113 W · 167 L | -10.8wins | -0.04per pick | 44cpaid | -9.7%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x3e68…fcb9backed Over | 75c | 120.2$90 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$90.15 | 25 | 52%13 W · 12 L | +3.5wins | +0.14per pick | 38cpaid | +83.3%equal weight | 58+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x160a…43d3backed Under | 25c | 120$30 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$90 | 6 | 83.3%5 W · 1 L | +2.4wins | +0.40per pick | 44cpaid | +125.7%equal weight | 59+0.08 edge/pick |
| 0x076d…8d4cbacked Under | 49c | 90.78$44 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$46.3 | 359 | 47.4%170 W · 189 L | +0.8wins | 0.00per pick | 47cpaid | -1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x3c92…c646backed Over | 52c | 57.69$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30 | 6 | 16.7%1 W · 5 L | -1.5wins | -0.25per pick | 41cpaid | -70.2%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x004c…ab0cbacked Over | 69c | 41.52$28 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$28.48 | 2 | 50%1 W · 1 L | -0.4wins | -0.19per pick | 69cpaid | -27.1%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xda33…cd9abacked Over | 76c | 39.49$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$29.97 | 11 | 36.4%4 W · 7 L | -1.8wins | -0.17per pick | 53cpaid | -35.9%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x7376…7767backed Over | 49c | 30.61$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15 | 2 | 0%0 W · 2 L | -0.9wins | -0.47per pick | 47cpaid | -100%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xa34d…b57fbacked Over | 55c | 28.62$16 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15.76 | 41 | 63.4%26 W · 15 L | +3.3wins | +0.08per pick | 55cpaid | +8.4%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Asian League and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 16 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: 1st Half O/U 0.5this page
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: 1st Half O/U 1.5Under won
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: Both Teams to ScoreNo won
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 0.5Over won
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 1.5Over won
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 2.5Under won
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 3.5Under won
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 4.5Under won
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 5.5Under won
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: Shanghai Shenhua FC O/U 0.5Under won
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: Shanghai Shenhua FC O/U 1.5Under won
- Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: Shanghai Shenhua FC O/U 2.5Under won
- Spread: Shanghai Shenhua FC (-1.5)Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC won
- Spread: Shanghai Shenhua FC (-2.5)Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC won
- Spread: Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC (-1.5)Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC won
- Spread: Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC (-2.5)Shanghai Shenhua FC won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.