TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

Europa Conference League · resolved market

Spread: Nottingham Forest FC (-1.5)

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
FC Midtjyllandof Nottingham Forest FC, FC Midtjylland
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
Europa Conference Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$13,912
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$13,810

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $13,912 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 31 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Europa Conference League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in Europa Conference League
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0x204f…5e14backed FC Midtjylland76c5,978$4,532 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$1,446.223,72647%1,750 W · 1,976 L+20.0wins+0.01per pick46cpaid-8.8%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0xc7e5…2d3abacked Nottingham Forest FC19c2,698$500 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$5005927.1%16 W · 43 L+0.6wins+0.01per pick26cpaid+8%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0xdbb4…48bebacked Nottingham Forest FC42c1,510$639 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$638.8610%0 W · 1 L-0.4wins-0.42per pick42cpaid-100%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x0d42…f124backed Nottingham Forest FC18c1,215$219 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$218.76330.2%19 W · 44 L-2.0wins-0.03per pick33cpaid-39.8%equal weight47-0.02 edge/pick
0xecfc…cd05backed Nottingham Forest FC19c580$110 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$110.1711242.9%48 W · 64 L-0.1wins0.00per pick43cpaid+7.1%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xa35f…b58fbacked Nottingham Forest FC18c358.95$66 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$65.995540%22 W · 33 L+2.6wins+0.05per pick35cpaid+34.2%equal weight54+0.03 edge/pick
0x4f74…97b6backed Nottingham Forest FC18c300$54 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$54425%1 W · 3 L-0.1wins-0.02per pick27cpaid-35.9%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x39c0…681cbacked Nottingham Forest FC41c262.95$108 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$107.81812.5%1 W · 7 L-3.0wins-0.37per pick50cpaid-79.2%equal weight40-0.09 edge/pick
0xfb61…25e3backed Nottingham Forest FC21c214.29$45 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$45333.3%1 W · 2 L+0.3wins+0.11per pick22cpaid+7.5%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x1cdd…e595backed Nottingham Forest FC25c200.49$49 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$49.3733522.4%75 W · 260 L-43.5wins-0.13per pick35cpaid-52.8%equal weight37-0.12 edge/pick
0x6fbc…bdfbbacked Nottingham Forest FC20c165$33 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$333834.2%13 W · 25 L+1.2wins+0.03per pick31cpaid-3.9%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xa07d…a037backed Nottingham Forest FC22c155.24$34 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$33.8416013.1%21 W · 139 L-18.8wins-0.12per pick25cpaid-47%equal weight39-0.10 edge/pick
0x06a9…1a49backed Nottingham Forest FC20c150$30 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$3014352.4%75 W · 68 L+8.8wins+0.06per pick46cpaid+9.7%equal weight56+0.05 edge/pick
0x33c8…68d7backed Nottingham Forest FC40c150$60 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$60714.3%1 W · 6 L-0.5wins-0.07per pick21cpaid-48.2%equal weight48-0.01 edge/pick
0x4fc1…075ebacked Nottingham Forest FC19c147.37$28 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$2820%0 W · 2 L-0.6wins-0.28per pick28cpaid-100%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x5e78…ccd1backed Nottingham Forest FC19c131.58$25 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$25560%3 W · 2 L+1.4wins+0.29per pick31cpaid+110%equal weight55+0.05 edge/pick
0x7a57…968cbacked Nottingham Forest FC40c125$50 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$50540%2 W · 3 L-0.3wins-0.06per pick46cpaid-16.5%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0xa1e6…3cd2backed Nottingham Forest FC20c125$25 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$25520%1 W · 4 L-0.4wins-0.07per pick27cpaid-42.9%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x155d…3ec8backed Nottingham Forest FC21c119.76$25 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$252356.5%13 W · 10 L+3.9wins+0.17per pick40cpaid+64.2%equal weight59+0.08 edge/pick
0x2005…75eabacked Nottingham Forest FC25c104.14$26 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$26.442,99042.5%1,270 W · 1,720 L+9.4wins0.00per pick42cpaid-11.1%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xdd03…df4abacked Nottingham Forest FC14c89.99$12 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$12.54427.3%12 W · 32 L0.0wins0.00per pick27cpaid-7.5%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x397e…3d84backed FC Midtjylland30c78.79$24 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$55.1523461.5%144 W · 90 L+26.7wins+0.11per pick50cpaid+31.8%equal weight61+0.10 edge/pick
0xf102…1348backed Nottingham Forest FC19c52.98$10 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$10.0737926.1%99 W · 280 L-8.1wins-0.02per pick28cpaid-4.8%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x1b44…d8debacked Nottingham Forest FC42c51$21 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$21.243050%15 W · 15 L+3.1wins+0.10per pick40cpaid+13.9%equal weight56+0.06 edge/pick
0x44b8…a2d7backed Nottingham Forest FC42c47.62$20 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$205648.2%27 W · 29 L+1.9wins+0.03per pick45cpaid+8.7%equal weight53+0.02 edge/pick
0xbefe…2d45backed Nottingham Forest FC78c39.13$31 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$30.52837.5%3 W · 5 L-0.7wins-0.08per pick46cpaid-15.6%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0xffea…5f0abacked Nottingham Forest FC73c38.79$28 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$28.321855.6%10 W · 8 L+0.6wins+0.03per pick52cpaid-3.8%equal weight52+0.01 edge/pick
0xdc86…7e77backed FC Midtjylland76c32.88$25 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$7.837848.7%38 W · 40 L-2.7wins-0.03per pick52cpaid-13.6%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0x77bc…b91bbacked Nottingham Forest FC37c30.66$11 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$11.3570239.3%276 W · 426 L-18.0wins-0.03per pick42cpaid-21.4%equal weight47-0.02 edge/pick
0xe790…7df7backed FC Midtjylland61c16.5$10 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$6.44850%4 W · 4 L-0.9wins-0.11per pick61cpaid-21.4%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0xfacd…d470backed FC Midtjylland80c15$12 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$32373.9%17 W · 6 L+0.3wins+0.01per pick73cpaid+4.3%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Europa Conference League and say nothing about this market.

The rest of this event

Polymarket sells these questions together. 8 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.