Tennis · resolved market
Los Cabos Open: Michael Zheng vs Martin Landaluce
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xa2ef637747cfa2f0168252a1e364801971fb0660a94c6ab21da6b65fe5993c48
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Michael Zhengof Michael Zheng, Martin Landaluce
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $1,123,371
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $1,216,642
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $1,123,371 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
The 100 largest positions, of 303 wallets holding a qualified pick here — biggest first. This page details 100 at most, and the number beside it is the real one. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xe30e…6b87backed Michael Zheng | 58c | 401,468$234,377 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$167,090.79 | 74 | 52.7%39 W · 35 L | +4.6wins | +0.06per pick | 47cpaid | +2%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x2c33…0563backed Martin Landaluce | 41c | 290,275$120,098 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$120,097.98 | 1,178 | 46.3%545 W · 633 L | +0.5wins | 0.00per pick | 46cpaid | -10.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xb4d2…ce99backed Martin Landaluce | 38c | 70,014$26,939 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$26,938.53 | 4,921 | 38.7%1,905 W · 3,016 L | -20.0wins | 0.00per pick | 39cpaid | -7.5%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x8201…8a41backed Michael Zheng | 61c | 70,000$42,549 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$27,450.55 | 34 | 67.6%23 W · 11 L | +0.1wins | 0.00per pick | 67cpaid | -2.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xfe78…0319backed Michael Zheng | 58c | 54,331$31,755 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$22,575.33 | 8,828 | 36.1%3,190 W · 5,638 L | -193.3wins | -0.02per pick | 38cpaid | -27.2%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x32b4…8b21backed Martin Landaluce | 47c | 35,666$16,631 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$16,631.17 | 3,605 | 42.4%1,530 W · 2,075 L | -43.2wins | -0.01per pick | 44cpaid | -16.7%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5f65…2036backed Martin Landaluce | 46c | 31,736$14,500 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14,500 | 744 | 39.8%296 W · 448 L | -0.3wins | 0.00per pick | 40cpaid | -3.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x30c1…9f91backed Martin Landaluce | 31c | 30,382$9,317 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$9,317.14 | 163 | 44.8%73 W · 90 L | -6.8wins | -0.04per pick | 49cpaid | -7.1%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xa4fd…748bbacked Martin Landaluce | 47c | 18,840$8,891 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$8,890.75 | 44 | 31.8%14 W · 30 L | -4.9wins | -0.11per pick | 43cpaid | -36.3%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x6485…a265backed Michael Zheng | 73c | 14,756$10,820 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$3,936.39 | 2,281 | 52%1,187 W · 1,094 L | +82.3wins | +0.04per pick | 48cpaid | +3.5%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x6982…a165backed Martin Landaluce | 49c | 12,392$6,126 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$6,126.01 | 629 | 56.9%358 W · 271 L | +0.8wins | 0.00per pick | 57cpaid | +2.5%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xf148…0b4fbacked Michael Zheng | 54c | 11,087$5,987 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$5,099.51 | 365 | 45.2%165 W · 200 L | +0.3wins | 0.00per pick | 45cpaid | -5.7%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x88d1…18dabacked Martin Landaluce | 45c | 11,000$4,950 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$4,949.99 | 274 | 60.2%165 W · 109 L | -3.5wins | -0.01per pick | 61cpaid | -2.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x66b1…340fbacked Michael Zheng | 76c | 10,188$7,759 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$2,428.63 | 1,158 | 44.4%514 W · 644 L | +2.3wins | 0.00per pick | 44cpaid | -5.4%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xff7b…1659backed Martin Landaluce | 22c | 10,080$2,218 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$2,217.6 | 34 | 52.9%18 W · 16 L | +1.4wins | +0.04per pick | 49cpaid | -7.9%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xe911…3d4ebacked Martin Landaluce | 48c | 8,526$4,079 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$4,079.36 | 4,426 | 51.8%2,291 W · 2,135 L | +136.7wins | +0.03per pick | 49cpaid | +0.4%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x5b63…11a4backed Martin Landaluce | 47c | 8,394$3,915 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$3,915.24 | 4,934 | 41.5%2,048 W · 2,886 L | -77.0wins | -0.02per pick | 43cpaid | -15.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x6d3c…d294backed Michael Zheng | 55c | 8,057$4,464 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$3,592.9 | 2,375 | 51.1%1,213 W · 1,162 L | +8.6wins | 0.00per pick | 51cpaid | -0.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xc463…9a2fbacked Martin Landaluce | 42c | 7,198$3,023 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$3,023.16 | 582 | 32%186 W · 396 L | -10.8wins | -0.02per pick | 34cpaid | -8.4%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xb272…5030backed Martin Landaluce | 42c | 6,747$2,834 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$2,833.79 | 144 | 43.8%63 W · 81 L | +3.6wins | +0.02per pick | 41cpaid | +2.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x32d2…8850backed Michael Zheng | 78c | 6,347$4,951 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$1,396.43 | 56 | 35.7%20 W · 36 L | -2.7wins | -0.05per pick | 41cpaid | -24.3%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x9d94…017dbacked Martin Landaluce | 36c | 5,723$2,059 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$2,058.96 | 2,068 | 34.9%721 W · 1,347 L | -44.2wins | -0.02per pick | 37cpaid | -25.6%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2d67…3667backed Martin Landaluce | 22c | 5,344$1,195 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$1,195.28 | 705 | 37.6%265 W · 440 L | -37.4wins | -0.05per pick | 43cpaid | -27.5%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xa0f2…1848backed Martin Landaluce | 27c | 5,137$1,371 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$1,371.25 | 1,365 | 43.3%591 W · 774 L | -26.5wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -19.2%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x6d20…a165backed Michael Zheng | 67c | 4,271$2,870 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$1,401.16 | 48 | 54.2%26 W · 22 L | -1.2wins | -0.02per pick | 57cpaid | -6.8%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x3663…8950backed Martin Landaluce | 24c | 4,003$961 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$960.72 | 392 | 43.4%170 W · 222 L | +21.0wins | +0.05per pick | 38cpaid | +11%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x076d…8d4cbacked Martin Landaluce | 16c | 3,838$632 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$632.42 | 4,241 | 52.6%2,232 W · 2,009 L | +65.0wins | +0.02per pick | 51cpaid | -1.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x547f…2937backed Martin Landaluce | 44c | 3,410$1,500 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$1,500.4 | 92 | 58.7%54 W · 38 L | +4.5wins | +0.05per pick | 54cpaid | +5.9%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Michael Zheng | 49c | 2,953$1,451 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$1,501.29 | 11,435 | 43.4%4,959 W · 6,476 L | +17.8wins | 0.00per pick | 43cpaid | -20.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xe6a9…e35abacked Michael Zheng | 79c | 2,900$2,280 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$620.41 | 95 | 58.9%56 W · 39 L | +4.4wins | +0.05per pick | 54cpaid | +8.2%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x2542…7821backed Martin Landaluce | 38c | 2,665$1,000 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$1,000 | 207 | 49.8%103 W · 104 L | -13.5wins | -0.07per pick | 56cpaid | -12.5%equal weight | 44-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x2d6a…8addbacked Michael Zheng | 56c | 2,500$1,412 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$1,087.89 | 1,729 | 48.9%845 W · 884 L | +53.2wins | +0.03per pick | 46cpaid | +8.8%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xde9f…d43cbacked Michael Zheng | 79c | 2,412$1,903 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$509.45 | 6,599 | 50.7%3,343 W · 3,256 L | +259.7wins | +0.04per pick | 47cpaid | -4.9%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x48de…95babacked Michael Zheng | 55c | 2,364$1,300 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$1,063.64 | 625 | 45.4%284 W · 341 L | -7.7wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -3.1%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xcd2c…b707backed Martin Landaluce | 15c | 2,307$349 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$349.43 | 111 | 26.1%29 W · 82 L | -4.3wins | -0.04per pick | 30cpaid | -15.4%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x99f0…9495backed Martin Landaluce | 41c | 2,201$902 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$901.99 | 2,174 | 36.9%802 W · 1,372 L | +39.5wins | +0.02per pick | 35cpaid | +6.7%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x1cd2…7f85backed Michael Zheng | 48c | 2,083$1,000 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$1,083.33 | 53 | 50.9%27 W · 26 L | -3.2wins | -0.06per pick | 57cpaid | -13.8%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xd218…b5c9backed Martin Landaluce | 23c | 2,006$468 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$467.75 | 6,720 | 36.9%2,479 W · 4,241 L | -95.8wins | -0.01per pick | 38cpaid | -20.5%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xadfb…c2efbacked Martin Landaluce | 43c | 1,926$828 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$828.03 | 3,256 | 48.2%1,570 W · 1,686 L | -53.4wins | -0.02per pick | 50cpaid | -4.2%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x0d2d…7ff5backed Martin Landaluce | 59c | 1,893$1,121 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$1,121.47 | 8,505 | 42.6%3,619 W · 4,886 L | -166.3wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -21.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x5c18…2f76backed Martin Landaluce | 27c | 1,889$506 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$506.27 | 1,822 | 41%747 W · 1,075 L | -30.2wins | -0.02per pick | 43cpaid | -9.2%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x42c9…9623backed Michael Zheng | 58c | 1,748$1,020 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$728.46 | 4,703 | 49.4%2,323 W · 2,380 L | +166.5wins | +0.04per pick | 46cpaid | -3.7%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xa9f5…937fbacked Martin Landaluce | 36c | 1,703$605 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$605.22 | 4,602 | 48.3%2,223 W · 2,379 L | +34.4wins | +0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -8.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xda77…683fbacked Martin Landaluce | 37c | 1,684$623 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$622.73 | 5,416 | 48.6%2,633 W · 2,783 L | +14.5wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | -9.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x9c98…f4f4backed Michael Zheng | 60c | 1,674$1,000 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$674.02 | 27 | 51.9%14 W · 13 L | -2.3wins | -0.09per pick | 60cpaid | -17.9%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x8f3c…2f57backed Martin Landaluce | 46c | 1,565$720 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$720.01 | 307 | 40.7%125 W · 182 L | -23.3wins | -0.08per pick | 48cpaid | -19.4%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x98db…dd17backed Michael Zheng | 62c | 1,545$953 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$591.12 | 5,350 | 56.4%3,016 W · 2,334 L | +228.4wins | +0.04per pick | 52cpaid | -6.4%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x58b3…653cbacked Martin Landaluce | 61c | 1,500$915 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$914.94 | 450 | 36%162 W · 288 L | +12.1wins | +0.03per pick | 33cpaid | +14.3%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xd9e0…05f2backed Martin Landaluce | 29c | 1,443$420 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$419.82 | 2,766 | 47.7%1,318 W · 1,448 L | +44.2wins | +0.02per pick | 46cpaid | -18.4%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xad0b…a514backed Martin Landaluce | 46c | 1,421$658 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$657.96 | 55 | 30.9%17 W · 38 L | -8.0wins | -0.14per pick | 45cpaid | -31.5%equal weight | 39-0.10 edge/pick |
| 0xe907…cff6backed Martin Landaluce | 33c | 1,339$443 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$443.48 | 2,854 | 39.5%1,126 W · 1,728 L | -83.5wins | -0.03per pick | 42cpaid | -22.9%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x1e97…6561backed Martin Landaluce | 44c | 1,222$538 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$537.78 | 34 | 52.9%18 W · 16 L | -1.6wins | -0.05per pick | 58cpaid | -4.1%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x4093…5749backed Michael Zheng | 79c | 1,220$969 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$250.13 | 2,855 | 49.4%1,410 W · 1,445 L | +21.3wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -5.2%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x78a2…6986backed Michael Zheng | 55c | 1,170$644 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$526.54 | 3 | 100%3 W · 0 L | +1.2wins | +0.40per pick | 60cpaid | +72.8%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xeaac…d71dbacked Michael Zheng | 55c | 1,000$550 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$450 | 1,865 | 45.6%851 W · 1,014 L | +50.3wins | +0.03per pick | 43cpaid | +6.2%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xcc57…2b3cbacked Michael Zheng | 63c | 954.83$600 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$354.83 | 141 | 51.1%72 W · 69 L | -5.0wins | -0.04per pick | 55cpaid | -5.4%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x9807…157bbacked Martin Landaluce | 44c | 909.99$400 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$400.4 | 334 | 38.6%129 W · 205 L | +6.9wins | +0.02per pick | 37cpaid | +5.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2cb6…1d53backed Michael Zheng | 50c | 900$450 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$450 | 4 | 50%2 W · 2 L | -0.3wins | -0.08per pick | 58cpaid | -13.8%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x27f7…44b0backed Michael Zheng | 39c | 888$346 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$541.68 | 200 | 40%80 W · 120 L | +7.9wins | +0.04per pick | 36cpaid | +14.4%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x84ad…bfb7backed Michael Zheng | 56c | 861.98$480 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$381.8 | 4,533 | 67.7%3,071 W · 1,462 L | +306.6wins | +0.07per pick | 61cpaid | +5.2%equal weight | 57+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0xb4d0…a1c5backed Martin Landaluce | 29c | 856.84$252 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$252 | 1,566 | 40%627 W · 939 L | -32.0wins | -0.02per pick | 42cpaid | -8.5%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x505f…645ebacked Michael Zheng | 56c | 820.2$459 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$361.05 | 1,626 | 52.7%857 W · 769 L | +13.7wins | +0.01per pick | 52cpaid | -6.9%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5213…6a35backed Michael Zheng | 55c | 801.77$441 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$360.79 | 1,865 | 44.7%834 W · 1,031 L | +36.5wins | +0.02per pick | 43cpaid | +3.4%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xb517…06ddbacked Martin Landaluce | 32c | 781.25$250 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$250 | 41 | 58.5%24 W · 17 L | +4.0wins | +0.10per pick | 49cpaid | +12.9%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x4411…985ebacked Martin Landaluce | 46c | 741.14$341 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$340.92 | 2,145 | 54.2%1,162 W · 983 L | -1.6wins | 0.00per pick | 54cpaid | -2.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x7b20…8eafbacked Martin Landaluce | 43c | 729.98$314 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$313.89 | 97 | 61.9%60 W · 37 L | +6.1wins | +0.06per pick | 56cpaid | +14.8%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xc196…2e6bbacked Michael Zheng | 56c | 714.29$400 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$314.29 | 123 | 39%48 W · 75 L | -8.8wins | -0.07per pick | 46cpaid | -20.4%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x28e0…2e6bbacked Michael Zheng | 73c | 699.98$512 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$188 | 517 | 44.7%231 W · 286 L | -5.3wins | -0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -2.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x3783…0038backed Martin Landaluce | 44c | 681.82$300 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$300 | 36 | 36.1%13 W · 23 L | +1.5wins | +0.04per pick | 32cpaid | -2.6%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x38f1…9ff1backed Martin Landaluce | 44c | 666$293 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$293.04 | 385 | 50.4%194 W · 191 L | +6.9wins | +0.02per pick | 49cpaid | +3.7%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xfcf0…ff0abacked Martin Landaluce | 15c | 644.97$99 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$99 | 49 | 34.7%17 W · 32 L | +1.5wins | +0.03per pick | 32cpaid | -0.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x4a55…a82abacked Michael Zheng | 57c | 635.38$362 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$273.49 | 327 | 47.7%156 W · 171 L | +7.2wins | +0.02per pick | 46cpaid | -2.9%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xdc41…dd7ebacked Martin Landaluce | 23c | 607$140 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$139.61 | 332 | 35.2%117 W · 215 L | +8.5wins | +0.03per pick | 33cpaid | +6.4%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xfeab…9cd0backed Martin Landaluce | 24c | 605.88$145 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$145 | 504 | 42.7%215 W · 289 L | +12.2wins | +0.02per pick | 40cpaid | +5.7%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xb6a8…b1f7backed Martin Landaluce | 29c | 579.33$165 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$165.31 | 287 | 38.3%110 W · 177 L | -3.2wins | -0.01per pick | 39cpaid | -5.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xafaf…1635backed Martin Landaluce | 29c | 535.51$154 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$153.91 | 2,049 | 46.8%958 W · 1,091 L | +19.0wins | +0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -20.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x99fc…ec26backed Michael Zheng | 57c | 526.32$300 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$226.32 | 645 | 40.2%259 W · 386 L | -19.6wins | -0.03per pick | 43cpaid | -12.6%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x4818…fde0backed Michael Zheng | 60c | 500$300 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$200 | 48 | 60.4%29 W · 19 L | +6.8wins | +0.14per pick | 46cpaid | +36.7%equal weight | 60+0.09 edge/pick |
| 0x26f2…4c29backed Martin Landaluce | 50c | 500$250 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$250 | 83 | 26.5%22 W · 61 L | +8.0wins | +0.10per pick | 17cpaid | +72.1%equal weight | 58+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x5c2a…a4bbbacked Martin Landaluce | 43c | 466.65$200 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$200 | 219 | 37.9%83 W · 136 L | +0.3wins | 0.00per pick | 38cpaid | +1.8%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x0b14…3ca3backed Martin Landaluce | 44c | 450$198 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$198 | 494 | 47.2%233 W · 261 L | +12.6wins | +0.03per pick | 45cpaid | +7.3%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xf051…acd4backed Martin Landaluce | 35c | 430.56$150 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$150 | 78 | 51.3%40 W · 38 L | +2.6wins | +0.03per pick | 48cpaid | -2.1%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xdbdd…a5debacked Michael Zheng | 53c | 424.78$224 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$200.7 | 6,439 | 54.4%3,502 W · 2,937 L | +285.2wins | +0.04per pick | 50cpaid | +26.3%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x0598…3d83backed Martin Landaluce | 31c | 423.74$130 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$130 | 139 | 38.8%54 W · 85 L | +6.4wins | +0.05per pick | 34cpaid | +3.6%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x0f17…0724backed Michael Zheng | 70c | 406.12$284 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$122.59 | 702 | 54.4%382 W · 320 L | +40.6wins | +0.06per pick | 49cpaid | +3.4%equal weight | 56+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x8c81…dcd3backed Martin Landaluce | 41c | 400$162 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$162 | 110 | 37.3%41 W · 69 L | +5.2wins | +0.05per pick | 33cpaid | +1.3%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x0a8d…7688backed Michael Zheng | 77c | 396.81$304 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$92.83 | 331 | 65%215 W · 116 L | +22.6wins | +0.07per pick | 58cpaid | +7.7%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0xa032…2090backed Michael Zheng | 50c | 392.87$197 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$195.47 | 1,624 | 49.8%809 W · 815 L | -9.7wins | -0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -4.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x168c…f24bbacked Michael Zheng | 52c | 384.62$200 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$184.62 | 624 | 57.7%360 W · 264 L | -17.8wins | -0.03per pick | 61cpaid | -4.5%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x6a80…d472backed Michael Zheng | 39c | 384.62$150 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$234.62 | 1,186 | 52.4%622 W · 564 L | +28.9wins | +0.02per pick | 50cpaid | +5.2%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x6f83…3af9backed Michael Zheng | 39c | 338.46$132 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$206.46 | 24 | 58.3%14 W · 10 L | +4.5wins | +0.19per pick | 39cpaid | +60.9%equal weight | 60+0.09 edge/pick |
| 0x1ba7…67a1backed Martin Landaluce | 44c | 337.5$149 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$148.5 | 659 | 42.2%278 W · 381 L | -25.3wins | -0.04per pick | 46cpaid | -7.8%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x7747…8d9bbacked Martin Landaluce | 45c | 337.31$152 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$151.79 | 319 | 41.4%132 W · 187 L | +4.2wins | +0.01per pick | 40cpaid | +1.9%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x4126…e68bbacked Michael Zheng | 56c | 337$189 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$147.88 | 1,159 | 69%800 W · 359 L | +56.8wins | +0.05per pick | 64cpaid | +4%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xc4bb…22a9backed Martin Landaluce | 45c | 323.3$144 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$143.87 | 57 | 50.9%29 W · 28 L | +0.8wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -0.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xfb0c…8c72backed Michael Zheng | 56c | 301.74$169 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$132.77 | 528 | 47%248 W · 280 L | -19.8wins | -0.04per pick | 51cpaid | -8.3%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xe055…3157backed Michael Zheng | 56c | 285.71$160 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$125.71 | 109 | 56%61 W · 48 L | +0.2wins | 0.00per pick | 56cpaid | -0.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xf0b3…145dbacked Michael Zheng | 56c | 276.79$155 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$121.79 | 917 | 54%495 W · 422 L | 0.0wins | 0.00per pick | 54cpaid | -0.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xec39…64bbbacked Michael Zheng | 79c | 276.03$217 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$59.09 | 40 | 57.5%23 W · 17 L | -3.0wins | -0.07per pick | 65cpaid | -9.1%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xfffa…17c5backed Martin Landaluce | 37c | 263.84$99 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$98.75 | 365 | 45.2%165 W · 200 L | -2.7wins | -0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -20.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 4 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Los Cabos Open: Michael Zheng vs Martin Landalucethis page
- Set 1 Winner: Zheng vs LandaluceZheng won
- Set 2 Winner: Zheng vs LandaluceZheng won
- Set Handicap: Zheng (-1.5) vs Landaluce (+1.5)Zheng won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.