Wallet 0x47c7…cac7
https://tailmypicks.com/w/0x47c754f0c7a9181173ce6d2fb57cdba7e06ecac7
Rebuilt .
What this wallet holds right now
Last asked . We read the wallets we follow in rotation; the one we have gone longest without asking about was asked .
- Positions on running markets
- 3
- What they are worth now
- $897
- Settled, not yet cashed
- 46
bought for $975
worth $0
Its 3 running positions
| Market | Position | Paid | Now | Worth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Will Chicago Fire FC win on 2026-07-16?backed No | 1,324shares | 64c | 60c | $794 |
| Market 0xa977…db5dbacked outcome 1 | 179.06shares | 69c | 54c | $97 |
| Chicago Fire FC vs. Vancouver Whitecaps FC: O/U 2.5backed Under | 11.16shares | 33c | 50c | $6 |
Paid is Polymarket’s own average price over what the wallet still holds — it is not the entry price TailMyPicks derives for a scored pick, which is the volume-weighted average of the buys on the side it picked. Now is what the same outcome costs on Polymarket as of the last catalogue refresh. Nothing on this table is a result: these markets have not resolved and there is nothing yet to be right about.
Settled bets it has not cashed in
The 5 largest of 46. These are markets that have already resolved: the money is sitting there and the wallet has not collected it. They are not open convictions, which is why they are not in the figures above.
| Market | Position | Paid | Worth | In the record? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Le Mans FC vs. Stade Brestois 29: O/U 2.5backed Under · resolved | 3,136shares | 51c | $0 | Counted |
| West Ham United FC vs. Charlton Athletic FC: O/U 2.5backed Under · resolved | 3,136shares | 40c | $0 | Counted |
| Market 0xf1b1…fbfbbacked outcome 1 | 3,136shares | 40c | $0 | Not ingested |
| Will Portland Timbers win on 2026-08-19?backed No · resolved | 1,568shares | 48c | $0 | Counted |
| Shimizu S-Pulse vs. Yokohama F·Marinos: O/U 2.5backed Over · resolved | 1,568shares | 47c | $0 | Counted |
Do these count towards the record above? 4 do — the wallet holds a scored pick on those markets, already in the table below. 1 is not in the published record at all — TailMyPicks has published nothing about that market, so it is neither counted nor ruled out. Either it has yet to be ingested, or nothing anybody held on it was ever scored.
These figures and the record below never add up. What this wallet is holding on Polymarket right now and what TailMyPicks has scored it on are two different sets of markets, measured in different ways — the record covers markets that have already resolved and been graded, these figures cover money that is still on the table. No number on this page combines them, and adding one to the other would mean nothing.
Summary
- Qualified picks
- 1,179
- Categories scored
- 13
- Categories below 50
- 3
Best Category: Serie A, grading 63 out of 100 (+0.12 per pick).
Best Category Serie A at 63 out of 100; worst Champions League at 43.
What is a Tail Score?
A mark out of 100, per Category. 50 means no edge at all — this wallet did about what the prices it paid implied it would. Above 50 it beat those prices; below 50 it did worse than them.
The scale does not move. 100 is a wallet beating the prices it paid by 0.45 per pick and 0 is losing to them by the same, on every wallet, on every page, in every month. So a grade you screenshot today still means what it meant when you took it, and two wallets can be put side by side.
Nobody reaches either end. Across every wallet TailMyPicks has scored, the marks run from roughly 5 to 87 — which is what a fixed ruler costs, and what buys the sentence above.
It is not a win rate. A wallet can win four Picks in five and still grade below 50, if the market was already pricing those outcomes at 90c — it paid for the wins rather than finding them. The vs expected and Avg entry columns below are what separate the two.
The mark is deliberately pulled toward 50 when there is little evidence. Three lucky Picks do not produce a high grade; several hundred consistent ones do. So a modest grade on thousands of Picks means something a high grade on twelve does not.
Because it is shrunk this way, a Category grade is a conservative reading. The headline figure for a wallet is its best Category, so it always understates how badly the wallet does in its worst one — which is why the table below is per Category and not one blended number.
Record by Category
Ordered by how much this wallet actually traded in each Category, not by score — so the Categories it plays most appear first whether they went well or badly. Open any row to see the picks its numbers were computed from — all of them.
vs expected is how many more (or fewer) Picks this wallet won than the prices it paid implied it would. It is the column that tells a real edge apart from a record bought by backing favourites. Realizable edge is what that comes to per Pick for somebody copying the wallet, after the cost of getting in behind it. Avg entry is the average price it paid, so a strong record built on heavy favourites shows as one. ROI per pick counts every Pick equally rather than by size, which is how a record earned across many Picks is told apart from one carried by a few large ones. Days are shown in US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in — an American night game settles after midnight UTC, so any other zone would name the day after the one it was played on. Inactive means nothing has resolved in that Category recently. The score is kept and the wallet stays reachable here; it only leaves the default leaderboard.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.